GG

And you possess the definitive proof that a child born out of wedlock in the mid 18th century in the most racially mixed region in the world was of pure European white descent.

Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean there wasn't an answer. I have no idea of what truth you're seeking, because there are varying interpretations of the truth. What many here have been saying is that one side has consistently been telling a much fuller version of the "truth" because they report on more basic facts that are in the public domain, while the other side is much more selective. That's why there's deserved piling on to the NYT piece. Wouldn't you agree that they changed the narrative by a lot when they left out a major factoid that FBI leadership was not certain there were any legs to the Russia collusion theory when they launched their investigation? In their version, it's perfectly plausible for them to investigate Trump for colluding with Putin. But when you consider that the upper echelon had misgivings about the theory, then the story changes into a witch hunt. And please enlighten me of the exact accusation that Trump is guilty of? How many people here rushed to his defense in Trump University or Trump Foundation cases?

She's quite amazing pulling off a Congressional spot and coaching the Jets at the same time.

That's up to you to decide, although you have to wonder about someone who's asking an anonymous opinion on the internet to help him find the truth. One thing is clear, one side has a far greater volume of the evidence backing its reporting.

Wow, the stills are nowhere as creepy as the video. That's one hell of a nervous tic

Considering Hamilton's birthplace and uncertainty about his paternity, it's more likely that Miranda is a closer relative than a random white dude. But I'm sure you knew that.

Imagine a world where a bartender tries to explain accrual accounting

The available evidence certainly points to the former, at least in how the narrative comes out and how it spreads. Friday's NYT article is a good illustration. It's damning not in what it reported, but what it omitted.

Nobody (including Greggy) has ever claimed that he has more information than everyone else. The contention has been that the reporting by the large media outlets does not represent a true account of the evidence that's been made available.

Canada is like the whiney son of the unemployable younger brother who only has a job thanks to the more successful sibling.

And there’s the escape hatch Greggy. When all is said and done, the story will be spun that the FBI were heros not because they thought Trump was a Russian asset, but because he was incompetent and they were trying to save America. That’s what all the narratives have been about and are starting to point to that conclusion.

Well, it is Brazil.

Is this the close up?

I think so. He played it sideways.

This is more appropriate for Acosta

Funny, I saw the Pegula jet heading to Colorado, but alas it’s to Aspen

The difference in the entry vs exit gates in that pic is striking.

That means shots fired at foreign healthcare plans that feed off US consumers.

That's a fine tuned ear to recall Morse code blips

Where doe she have a higher probability of a longer career - starting QB, back-up QB, starting OF, bench player?

Would be an interesting decision, considering middling MLB players can make $10 million with far less wear and tear

Could also depend on where Wilks will land

Perhaps Nate Washington had a good point.

Ahh, shades of Mike McCoy rough

For the guy's sake, I hope NYT used a pseudonym