GG

Or at least move the thread to PPP for the full discussion to unfold

It's a long overdue change in how they are now covering mass shooters. Very little mention to them is given.

Without tipping his hat to his favored candidate, he can send out a random tweet hinting at what he'll do to US companies who leave the UK ?

I think that's why she phrased it that way.

Regulators don't know what to do either. In all these cases they will look to past examples, which obviously won't fit in the Internet age landscape. My guess is that they will put in some kind of a Chinese wall between the social network plumbing and the advertising & sales departments.

Let's put aside whether he was describing sexual assault because that is certainly not clear cut from the recording. What is clear is his amazement of what he could get away with now that he was a celebrity star. That should have been the scandal and why Billy Bush didn't push back on the conversation. Billy Bush knew exactly what Trump was referring to (as did Matt Lauer, listening back in his office)

Lynyrd is right, you are sliding into EII realm. How does explaining a gross misrepresentation of Trump's comments equate to an opinion?

There's a difference in having a different opinion than popping off on why people decide to post on that opinion. Take your own advice, the board will be better off for it.

Listen ***** face, my trite response was 1,000 better than the inane drunken contributions you've added to this board. I always respond to threads that evoke that particular episode to dispel the myth that Trump made a misogynistic comment. This is exactly how little lies turn into truth. That is clearly a case where the message was grossly distorted and more attention should have been paid to the cravenous celebrity culture instead of Trump's badly phrased comment. Of course, I don't expect you to figure that out. Now please regale us with the audits yo used to do in the 60's

Shouldn't you be directing this question to the person who brought this back?

First off, congrats on fixing your script so that replies now work. Second, do you think he was describing sexual assault, or the fact that as a celebrity he could have his way with women without impunity? Do you wonder why a billionaire was amazed at what happens in his new orbit? It's right there in the quote "And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything." Note he said "they." Who is the "they" who allows this to happen?

Add one more - 3. Why was he so surprised that he could act like that, once he became a celebrity?

Geez, 400 people signed an online form. What don’t you get?

Aren't the first ones tangibles?

You're preaching to the choir. The corruption is almost codified into national laws. There was hope that NAFTA would provide a spark in Mexico to liberalize their markets, but it was very slow because they still put big guards around foreign ownership. The ultimate promise never came fast, but has trickled in over the various administrations. who knows, maybe AMLO will be the catalyst to break up the family business cartels, but hopefully he will open up the country for more investment and not renationalize. So far, he's been talking the right tune.

The Central American countries have been in a perpetual civil war for the last 2 generations and you think more bloodshed is the cure?

Perhaps that's why Jared & Lighthizer have been at the tip of the negotiations to ensure that it isn't simply a money dump. In any event, you can't expect instant results, but if you offer the carrot and stick of investing in Central America and force them to change laws which allow those business investments to thrive, then you start chipping away at the problem. That is far more effective than trying to police a 5,000 mile borderline.

Since when did Schiff move to the Executive branch?

But you're ok wasting more money on this side of the border trying to control the flow?

That was a big part of Bush's 2007 immigration proposal.

Nothing like Trump acting on a whim to submarine hard work that's been done by his staff (and family). Was he even aware that Jared has had these talks with Mexico only 2 months ago? I doubt that you did and you probably do the same level of research that he does.

You probably would have gotten a similar or better deal by calling cable/DTV. Looking at Hulu Live TV pricing - $45 + premium channels, I don't see the $45/month savings. HBO is $15/mo and the other premiums and extra channels (Food, etc) and no NFL or NHL networks? That's why the answer is ALWAYS - IT DEPENDS on what your viewing preferences are. Do you inventory add up the true cost of the options and then make a decision.

Is that bad route/pass on the WR or very late throw by QB?

After reading the story, doesn't seem the case is that clear cut.

Morbidly, Beane is rooting for C/G injuries on other teams.