GG

It's a doctored receipt from '17

It's odd that Beane has no problem giving up valuable draft picks for unknown players on draft day. He's not as aggressive in giving up picks for proven players.

Upon further review, you're probably referring to the play immediately after the sack. He jerks his head in one direction only, not back and forth. To me that suggests loosening his neck (he did get hit at the upper shoulder/neck)

Did you see it in the game or on the broadcast? It may have happened away from the cameras, because there's nothing on the broadcast that shows him clearing the cobwebs at the start of 2nd or 3rd drives.

I looked for that too and didn't see it

A douche is the person who conflates things to make a point.

You are correct. His head did hit the turf hard on the scramble in the 2nd drive though (he also coughed up the ball)

I'll take that as a no. What was the favor that Trump referred to?

Someone should alert the opposing DCs.

Have you read the transcript? Great, another 3rd.. to keep track of

Obviously not, but I thought he had a weak camp.

Which part, Harry or Stanford DLs?

Which sources are unbiased?

Not when he apparently met her.

Shouldn't this be in the Epstein thread?

Not on this past Sunday. It's not like Barkley should have taken a sack on a first down. It was 3rd and 10 and the play needed to be made. It's disingenuous for you to highlight Barkley's mistakes, when the offense was in a better rhythm when he got in there, despite Pats* teeing off on him knowing that Bills had to pass in long down conversions.

Did you watch the replay? There's no way any QB escapes the hit because the expectation is that Nsekhe or Yeldon at least slows down the blister. Van Noy is on him as soon as he completes the drop back. If there's blame, then you can fault the play design that called for a 5 step drop when NE has been dominating our OL for a few series.

They tried more than one screen. None worked. You can't look at it in isolation and ask why didn't they run more screens. You also have to examine NE's defense in the game and see why screens did not work.

You keep bringing this up - the fumble is clearly on Barkley. But do you really fault him on the INT?

There were a handful of screen attempts that Pats* snuffed out pretty well.

It was a similar throw to when Duke came down with it and bulldozed the CB who was draped all over him into the end zone.

The follow-up question is how many of those young QBs who wilted under that pressure emerged to become successful QBs?

By my count, ST directly cost the Bills 10 points - punt block and failure to draw a penalty on Collins' FG jump.

That's exactly what the article was talking about. Another point brought up in a different thread was that Allen never rolled left, which is something that BB also game planned for.

Watching the All22 replay doesn't show anything illegal. But should be another knock on Farwell's lack of preparation, which is inexcusable against Pats*. Jamie Collins has made a career out of leaping over the line (I think the rule was changed for him). To not tell your OL to know exactly where Collins is lining up and not instruct them to immediately get your hands up to initiate contact on a leap, is grossly incompetent. Dawkins did the exact opposite of how you're supposed to block when Jamie Collins is over your head. This play makes it 10 points "given" up by the ST.