This is where I disagree. Bellicheat is known for his 'adjustments' - how hard is it to adjust when you find out what the other team is going to do? Brady is known for his uncanny ability to find the hot read and correct receiver against a defense. How hard is that when you know what the defensive call is? How much of their success time after time is Brady throwing a slant to the one correct read against a defense - no one talks about his great athleticism or ability - it's all predicated on knowing what the defense is doing. I hate the argument "they are so good, they don't need to cheat" - they were good BECAUSE they cheated.
Other people have talked about various games and situations that seemed unbelievable. For me it all changed the home game in 2004 (the Richard Seymour fumble return game). There were two separate plays that are burned in my memory. In both cases the Bills brought a blitz, and both times Brady just chucked the ball long as the blitzer came, in both cases he literally was not even looking where he was throwing, was more ducking to avoid the blitzer - long bombs complete to the only open area on the field, that he never even looked at. I sat there both times and though WTF, it was like he knew exactly what was coming and where the open part of the field would be before the ball was snapped. As soon as Spygate was revealed those plays were the first thing I thought of.
It absolutely blows my mind there are talking heads and people who continue the Brady one of the best all time narrative, when he should be disgraced and treated the same as Lance Armstrong and Barry Bonds - he was in the center of a systemic multi-faceted program of cheating for basically his whole career - he was successful because he cheated plain and simple.