Ramius

The morons screaming either of those lines are both idiots.

Great post OC! Whitner is a huge reason as to why the Bills are doing so well this year.

One time in his career, i'd like to see marshawn get to the second level without getting touched. Thats an indication of the OL, NOT Lynch.

Yeah, because the NFL doesn't have different "rules" for different positions.

Theres little difference between "it can't get any worse," and "its the end of the US as we know it."

Actually, you sure as sh-- sounded like you were equating not supporting Bush with being brainwashed by the "liberal elite media." You were basically saying that anyone opposing Bush can't make any decisions on their own.

Hell of a block, but as the above said, Ward appeared to lead with the crown of his helmet. My guess if that was a defender on a WR instead of vice versa, or if that hit was on a QB, there'd be a fine and a suspension.

Last i checked, you're supposed to buff off the Rain-X after 15 minutes.

http://tech.msn.com/products/slideshow.asp...mp;imageindex=5 (no, this isn't a link to his homepage)

looks like dwight drane made it into the news. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27244465

Or double teaming the 34 year old mom and her 18 year old daughter.

If Fred Jackson is an RFA (and as a caveat, i dont know if he is), then you tender him at the 1st round level. If someone offers him a boatload of cash to be a starter, let him walk and take the 1st in exchange.

i was close. oh wait, i think texas just scored again.

Not to mention the guy we want in round 1 will fall to us at the end of round 3.

Good post coach. McCargo was the mistake (but really the only mistake) of the 2006 draft. That draft set this team up nicely for the future.

Once again, your football analysis leaves much to be desired.

LA is a plumber. Remember those stories of him laying fabio's pipe or something? And i am guessing that laying the pipe of stars pays pretty well, which is how his business expanded. I think Wendy's offers carbon credits as a side option on their value menu.

One thing you need to ask yourself, is how well can a rookie step in on the OL and play at a high level. The Bills 1st rounder should be used on someone that can contribute right away. I'd rather (if possible) get a good OC in FA, and then draft an LB (to replace crowell) or even a DL. Where the bills have been missing the boat on OL is not in round 1, but in rounds 2 and 3, where the real values are.

There's a correlation, but is there causation? Most guards aren't drafted until the 20's at the earliest, meaning they are going to a playoff team. Obvisouly this means they will have a good supporting cast, as well as a good team around them, and they may not need to start right away. The OGs drafted later on are usually stepping into a much better situation that earlier picks. And in the NFL, a player's situation is everything.

Yup. The early runs and the long bomb were the only glaring mistakes the defense made. The OL line really improved in the second half, but still waaay too many penalties. The holding penalties probably took 3 scores off the board by ending drives prematurely. But the offense scored when they needed to, and Ponder has looked mostly solid back there. Someone needs to teach our WRs how to catch the damn ball however. Gano has looked good kicking FGs this season. Makes me wonder why the hell we waited until his senior year to let him try kicking. He's been much better than that douche cismesia.

well, we gutted that one out. Not the prettiest of games, but its a big road win for this young team, on the road in primetime on national team, all while fighting the damn thursday night football gods. Big test coming up next weekend against virginia tech.

Sounds good to me.

Theres a world of difference between raising and lowering taxes for specific groups and "handing 'rich' people's money to the poor." Raising taxes for the high income brackets and lowering taxes for lower income brackets isn't "giving rich people's money to the poor." Its "rich" people making a larger contribution to the government. But, let me ask, is it perfectly ok to raise taxes on the middle class and cut taxes for the upper income brackets?

I'm trying to figure this out...if Obama gets elected, he's basically going to force the "rich" people and businesses to go into the street and hand out $100 bills correct to the poor, stupid people? thats whats being implied in this thread. I mean, Obama is going to "take" their money and "give it away" to the poor.

I have to admit, the CO2 that comes out of a smokestack is not nearly as amusing/hilarious as the CO2 that comes from your mouth.