Jump to content

Coach Tuesday

Community Member
  • Posts

    17,722
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Coach Tuesday

  1. I've explained it. If you want a lengthier explanation, feel free to PM me. I try cases for a living. He's already admitted, himself, that he was an idiot for saying it the way he did...
  2. That would be a colossal waste of Dareus's talent and the Pegulas' money invested in it.
  3. Bend over backwards? Ok bud. Some of us want, you know, to win games...
  4. The verdict was upheld, and the judge called McDonalds' actions "callous." But, you know, facts...
  5. Excuse me, 180-190 degrees. It was still much higher than other coffee sellers, and enough to cause significant skin damage within seconds. http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm
  6. It was basically boiling. And McDonald's has since drastically lowered the temp. But it's fine if you don't care, you seem to know everything you need to know in life. Not performing up to pretty much everyone's expectations except yours.
  7. She would not have known that the coffee was something like 270 degrees. Watch the documentary. Or, just jump to conclusions and stay uninformed.
  8. That was far from frivolous and there is a great documentary about it. Her private parts were scalded.
  9. Assumption of risk is an offset - it's contributory fault. It usually doesn't bar a claim. I'd love to tell a jury in my opening statement in a concussion lawsuit that one of the 32 CEOs admitted casually that the sport is not safe enough for humans to be playing... it's not dispositive evidence or anything close to that, but it's great theater and it's a remarkably idiotic comment for Whaley to make. You can be sure that it's not just "the media" that cares about this - I have no doubt that Pegula is fielding angry calls from his co-owners and perhaps Park Avenue today.
  10. Those of you who think this is a non-story are misguided. Executives of NFL teams probably should not be yapping about how football isn't meant for humankind. Coupled with the fact that Whaley is a young GM already on the hot seat, for whom his owner has already looked for a Czar/Babysitter to oversee, this can't be helpful to his career.
  11. I actually think this policy is a punitive response to the media's reporting of that incident.
  12. Ironically Tim Ruskel, the previous GM of the Seahawks, had a similar approach to Whaley - he preferred prospects from established programs. Didn't work too well. It's a lazy draft/scouting strategy to be sure.
  13. Lawson was drafted for a specific role in a specific defense. He is replacing a highly productive (albeit inconsistent) player who did not fit into that specific defense. If this specific defense does not perform this year, there is a high likelihood that it will be scrapped and a new coaching staff will be ushered in, potentially rendering Lawson a poor fit. I've said it before, it continues to be my view that the Bills should've traded down from 19. We know Dallas was interested, other teams may have made offers as well. If you're going to take a medical risk, do it in Round 2, on a player with a tremendously high ceiling who can play in any scheme - that player is Miles Jack. The Bills used to use that approach and it scored them Sam Cowart and Thurman Thomas. The Shaq Lawson pick, to my mind, was a shortsighted, bungled maneuver by a flailing regime on its dying gasps. Sorry if that sucks to hear.
  14. Just ridiculous. This organization continues to be a laughingstock.
  15. He might be the best blocking WR in the NFL. Not saying you pay a premium for that, but still - on a running team, it's important.
×
×
  • Create New...