For me, on-line editions leave a lot to be desired.
One - I find the ads, the dancing bits of "bling" to be a distraction.
Two - often, I refer to different parts of an article. I find this easier with print media.
Three - the on-line editions do not carry all the articles - be it National, State, or local, that the print edition does.
Four - and most importantly to me, the on-line editions often presents a truncated, condensed version when compared to print.
I also find printed material much more amenable to contemplating and digesting what I've read.
With reductions in print media staff, there has been a reduction in local coverage of things that matter - government hanky-panky gets less ink, school boards and zoning boards meet with little or no exposure of their dealings to the general public and so forth.
The elimination of the written word, replacing it with audio/visual has long been a favorite theme of authors who write about future societies - Fahrenheit 451 is one example.
You might not like that 21st century. Even today, one could make a strong case how the internet, how audio/visual packaging of information has turned Presidential elections into something in the neighborhood of "American Idol".