Jump to content

Virgil

Community Member
  • Posts

    12,427
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Virgil

  1. You are 100% correct. I don’t know what happened honestly. Take the Giants. I’ll take a team in round 2.
  2. People wanted new teams, so I just assigned first come, first serve. You can have the Giants if you'd like or the teams with 2nd round picks, since the goal is to get through 2 rounds this time.
  3. Team positions are filled. New thread incoming
  4. I actually kind of prefer it. This way, it’s more a projection of long term value and calls out when someone is a reach. Like when EJ was drafted.... The point isn’t to predict when players will be drafted for these scenarios and shouldn’t be compared to a mock at all
  5. Huh? Just looking for a Titans owner
  6. 4 Left. Then we can get this party started
  7. There will be Updated the owners. If you asked for a new team or random, I gave you the first team available. However, if the original owner wants their team back, you’ll get bumped down to the next available team. Since we know we lost an owner, I let a new guy in already.
  8. I feel like that would make some people change their mind. Would you all like to just volunteer for new teams? I’ll throw the Giants back in if that’s the case
  9. Starting Friday at 5pm, we are going to do our second mock draft, but with no trades. Each player will have 8 hours to make their pick. If a pick is made after 8pm, the next pick will be due at 12pm the next day. The goal will be to complete at least one round, hopefully 2. 1 - Browns (NoPlaceToHyde) 2 - Giants (WhatDrought) 3 - Jets (joesixpack) 4 - Browns (NoPlaceToHyde) 5 - Broncos (Canadian Bills Fan) 6 - Colts (kdiggz) 7 - Bucs (CajunBillsBacker) 8 - Bears (TOBoy) 9 - 49ers (ChuckWagon) 10 - Raiders (RyanC883) 11 - Dolphins (section122) 12 - Bills (Forum Poll) 13 - Redskins (BillsPro) 14 - Packers (Dalton) 15 - Cardinals (TheBeane) 16 - Ravens (BuffaloHokie13) 17 - Chargers (patneiler) 18 - Seahawks (GunnerBill) 19 - Cowboys (EmotionallyUnstable) 20 - Lions (MAJBobby) 21 - Bengals (BuffaLoco) 22 - Bills (Forum Poll) 23 - Patriots (Aristocrat) 24 - Panthers (Wsam4031) 25 - Titans (Mr Wild) 26 - Falcons (Watkins101) 27 - Saints (frostbitmic) 28 - Steelers (xRushx) 29 - Jags (wppete) 30 - Vikings (TPS) 31 - Patriots (Aristocrat) 32 - Eagles (Blokestradamus)
  10. Holy **** man. How are you possibly turning that post into something about a QB? Take the agenda somewhere else and let the man talk about his DT Please don’t feed the trolls
  11. I don’t think they are going QB. Billicheat isn’t planning for life past Brady. They are walking out the door together
  12. Allen would make a lot of sense to NE if Brady is two years out
  13. Interesting to see them dump a WR when they also lost Amendola. Not a terrible deal for the Rams. They get their speed distraction after losing Sammy and don’t get the headache of Beckham. Wonder where he goes now....NE? Seems like a Moss move
  14. How are you scammed when you overpay? If so, I have a lawsuit waiting for a lot of retailers
  15. Are they doing day 1 also? My family got tix offered for day 2
  16. You think so with the Panthers? I wonder how good that relationship is with what’s happened recently there and the transition of ownership
  17. I knew I was forgetting someone. Maybe it’s because trades are more common, but it does feel like we have a large inner circle of friends now. Moreso than I can remember
  18. Valid point. Future relationships are important. It’s hard to not think we have a good relationship with the Chiefs, Eagles, and Bengals. Hopefully the Giants enter that fold
  19. The Broncos/Bills are the best example. If the Broncos want to trade back, they know we want a QB. What’s the line to make us think they are okay staying at 5 and is calling their bluff? It’s such a delicate negotiation to me. They want our picks, we want our QB if there. I’d hate to end with neither of us blinking and no one gets what they want.
  20. This isn’t specially about us trading up with the Giants as much as it’s about Bean and Gettleman. Are there any honest conversations going on between GM’s or are they all just playing cloak and dagger? I recognize that this is there job and income, which is determined by their draft success. So, not that I think this will happen, if the Giants say they want to stay at 2 for Allen and the Bills trade ahead of them to steal him, that could cost Gettleman his job. I get that side. Even though they have a personal relationship. But on the flip, do you think there’s conversations like: Bills - You looking to trade out of 2? Giants - We have a guy we want, if he falls, we are staying and taking him. If he’s gone, we will trade. Bills - We will offer you _______ Giants - okay, we will see what happens. I feel like there has to be a certain level of honesty out there or people might miss out. You have to show some good faith to make someone be more inclined to trade with you. While it won’t happen, if the Broncos don’t want a QB, I feel like the Giants, Broncos, and Bills could all make a trade together that benefits each other, but they don’t want to show their hand to each other. Broncos have holes, Giants want guys who will be there at 5, and the Bills have picks. If either of them want QB’s, it’s moot. If they don’t, it makes almost too much sense. It’s just frustrating to think about what probably won’t happen because people can’t be transparent with what they want. But I get why.
×
×
  • Create New...