Jump to content

newcam2012

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,310
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by newcam2012

  1. Of course that's true. But don't you have to take into account when Allen was on his rookie contract? That's when Beane's misses really hurt. That was the time to solidify the oline. He put himself in this position. There were plenty of optimal years for the Bills to thrive. Instead, they are left vulnerable in the trenches. We all know how important the trenches are. In short, I don't think it's fair to give Beane a pass because of Allen's big contract without talking about what he did prior to it. They go hand and hand.
  2. The failure to build a really solid oline has cost the Bills playoff wins and likely Super Bowl wins.
  3. That makes sense. What frustrates me is that the Bills Oline has been a problem for seemingly a decade and maybe more. Certainly, during Beane's tenure it's been a consistent theme. This year's oline is hopefully better.
  4. This is the wrong approach in my opinion. Look at the Chiefs success. Their Oline is a key part of their success. Conversely, the Bills Oline had been a nemesis for years now. The game is still largely won in the trenches.
  5. He's unproven for sure. He has a lot developing to do. I get the Bills are not giving up on him. However, I did expect some competition for him. That position is very vital to the offense. Seems a bit problematic.
  6. I wouldn't call him a bum. However, his offense was elementary and lacked creativity. He really failed to utilize his weapons and the play calling was too predictable. Of course, it wasn't all his fault but I feel he didn't put the Bills in the best position to excell. Imho, he was learning on the job. This year should tell us a lot. I think the Bills have new and improved weapons and an upgraded oline. He has to step it up.
  7. Let's see what McD does with this D. He has a big reputation and he better deliver. If not there has to be that conversation next year.
  8. Great point. That's what makes it much more difficult for the Bills. Philly at home with that defense and offense will be extremely difficult. Hard to pencil in a win for Buffalo. Cinci just demolished the Bills. The team had no answers on both sides of the ball. Plus, Bills might suffervsome PTSD going back to Cinci. Hard to pencil in win for the Bills. KC in Arrowhead is a tough ask. Mahomes is just a winner. The best QB in the game. Reid is an offensive guru. Bills can't stop Kelce. However, the Bills have some regular season success in Arrowhead. I could see the Bills squeezing out a win. (Come playoff time it's a different story).
  9. I misunderstood your question. I thought you were talking about the KC, Philly, and Cinci games. I think the Bills smash the Raiders and beat Wash too.
  10. I doubt they "step up." We know what they are. Inconsistent role players.
  11. Of course there are legit reasons the Bills need to see more of a healthy version of Brown. The point is it doesn't look at this point that there's a great alternative if Browns plays poorly or get injuried. Both a real possibilities. I would think the tackle position is not where you want a lot of weakness.
  12. Completely disagree. The 90s Bills oline was very good, the WR core was much balanced and better, and Hall of famer Thurman Thomas is a crystal clear example of why you are dead wrong. Not one RB on the Bills roster in 20' to 22' could hold his jock strap. Stop with your non sense.
  13. Come on now! Are you serious with this post? Seems like desperation at best and grasping at straws. Imho, it's pretty disingenuous. The point is this current offense shouldn't even be mentioned in the same breath as that 90s offense. That offense was phenomenal! The Kgun and no huddle offense was the talk of the NFL for years. This current offense has a lot to prove. There are lots of question marks. No need to rehash them. This thread is pretty ridiculous.
  14. All true. However, the Bills got throttled in every facet of the game. Offensively, defensely, special teams, and coaching. It was a totally break down from top to bottom. Yet, so many of us fans have short memories and a optimistic outlook. So optimistic that posters are thinking this is the best Buffalo offense ever. Folks, this offense scored 10 points vs an average Bengal defense in a home playoff game. Sure it's only one game but you just can't simply dismiss it either. The offensive pick ups, acquisitions, and drafts look to be promising. I think the oline and WR core has been upgraded. However, by no means do I see an elite Oline, WR core, RB core, and offensive coordinator.
  15. Great questions. This offense will be good.
  16. I know how the unrealistic homers will react to it. They will love it! Not sure what people are smoking thinking this offense is better than the Bills 90s Super Bowl team. Not even close folks... Which means nothing.
  17. Very well said. A reality based post although negative in sentiment is refreshing.
  18. There are a lot of question marks on the offensive side of the ball. The offense is pretty much above average simply because Allen there. Besides Diggs the WR core still looks underwhelming. At RB, Harris seems to be always hurt, Hines looks to be a special team player, and Cook is still young. He played well towards the end of the season. However, he still has a lot to prove. He has never been a 20 touch guy. In the past, we've seen promising young Bill RBs do well only to have disappointing years afterwards. Zac Moss comes to mind. Who knows what the Bills have in Dorsey? He has to grow an awful lot. His play calling was very simplistic and sporadic. How will this Oline gel together? I do like the move the Bills made. Kincaid looks to be a very good pass catcher. However, he's still a rookie and often there's a learning curve. It's a bit premature to be looking at him as the next Travis Kelce. Let's wait and see how he plays and if Dorsey can utilize his skill set. In short, I think the Bills offense on paper is better than last year's. No way no how is this offense close to the Bills offense of 90s Super Bowl run. Not even remotely close.
  19. Wow. Would you say those three teams are better than Buffalo?
  20. Not likely at all but of course it's possible.
  21. More than fair opinion. You have a much much much better eye for college talent than I. So I will defer...
  22. Wasn't that the sentiment on the Cody Ford pick too? Let's wait and see how the youngster performs vs NFL men before he's anointed the starter. The man dropped to 59 which does present some concern.
×
×
  • Create New...