Jump to content

Beck Water

Community Member
  • Posts

    11,656
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Beck Water

  1. And it just lost them the game. Sherman must be triggered again, “You need 1 yard! RUN THE DAMNED BALL!” WTF McDaniels with the decision making, going for two and then 2 successive pass plays there?
  2. I heard the words too, what I meant was maybe showed some stills of the formation and annotated to explain.
  3. I don’t understand that call at all. Wish the analysts had broken it down and explained it a bit
  4. Sure seems like it. “Unlimited make-up calls”
  5. So all of a sudden the Chiefs OL can protect forever, and somehow no holding is involved?
  6. Unfortunately last week 20-10 at halftime worked for the Bills. On Sunday 20-10 at half time worked for the Giants We’ll see if that’s superstitious or only a little stitious
  7. Ouch by the Announcers ”17 seconds for the Chiefs. We know what they can do with not a lot of time, Ask the Bills” I want a flag on the Announcers for Personal Foul, Unnecessary Roughness
  8. I didn’t see the pick on the replay but maybe
  9. Here’s an idea, cover ***** Kelce. The guy’s the size of a house, how can you lose track?
  10. So the fox thing whacks its head on the goalpost if the other team scores, or if the Chiefs fail to score? Could need a concussion check if this game keeps up
  11. Be easier to get the run game going with the Raiders OL and Jacob’s
  12. I hope Gabe Davis is studying those PI penalties Davante Adams drew, because if he came back hard for that underthrown ball that got picked I think he coulda got PI.
  13. If he’s a walrus, shouldn’t he be given a chunk of raw fish or something?
  14. Does anyone else find it absurd that in this age of computers and lasers and sensors we bring out chains to measure the manual spot of a ball in football games?
  15. I am weirdly amused by the Chiefs coyote or whatever that is mascot banging its head against the goalposts when the FG went wide R
  16. So you’re concluding this from basically 55 snaps running with the 1s in 2 games, in which he saw 7 targets? And another 24 snaps from garbage time? I think Shakir shows every promise of being a solid WR in the NFL, and maybe a very good one. But all that stuff about “has found open space more consistently” blah blah based on a very small sample size, is IMO “projecting” your own biases and beliefs onto what you see. It’s like the people who are alleging Bernard is so much better than Dodson based on like 41 snaps in “clean up time”. He may become that, but you really can’t tell that he is right now.
  17. I *think* he’s only been on six teams, so he needs to collect 3 more teams for the latter Where did the “veiled” part come in?
  18. I promise you, he was very embarrassed watching film today. As was whichever Steelers receiver had a clean catch followed by having the ball smashed out by Taron Johnson. (Edit: that was Deonte Johnson. Johnson on Johnson crime!) Whoever that was Stefon Diggs stiffarmed is probably getting his due share. Diggs looked like the Mighty Thor there, and as though there must be a trick to it, and he's been studying that trick with Allen for the last month.
  19. Funny you should mention that. I ROTFL at Frazier's interview this week. John Wawrow, 2:37 in Harrison Phillips said that Leslie Frazier had a very dry, very straight faced sense of humor where he'd say something and you'd go "oh, OK" and then a second later "WAIT WAT? He's having me on.." or "Did he just *ZING* me?" So Wawrow is determined to interrogate Frazier about "13 seconds" JW: "Now on to the Elephant in the room, are 13 seconds..is that a bad, is that a profanity around your parts? The words 13 seconds?" LF: (Makes face, then cracks little grin looks puzzled and answers very straight) "No, not in our parts, I'm not superstitious about the number 13, personally, so.....Nope, not at all!" (broadly smiling by the end) JW: "I'm referring of course to the end of the game, it's been called, it's been nicknamed 13 seconds, from January." LF: "My response would be Nope, Not at all" JW: "Fair enough" (goes on to grill Frazier about whether they'll cover the end of that game in their defensive meetings, whether Frazier feels the players need to hear about it) LF: (goes on to talk generally about how they go over different scenarios) Coaches wouldn't talk about it then, coaches won't talk about it now.
  20. Based on what? One start where Shakir had 3 excellent receptions on 5 targets, a TD, and a 35 yd kickoff return? We can pop back one game where McKenzie had 4 receptions on 6 targets, a TD, and a 42 yd kickoff return - and only played 3/4 of the game Yes, Shakir looks very promising and his physical attributes give him a higher ceiling than McKenzie, but his playing time is just starting and it's not without flaw. Let's pump the brakes on the comparisons just yet. Just FTR, there wasn't "the punt he let go". He fielded 4 punts and let 3 of them go, fair caught 1. One took a huge Steelers bounce, one took a huge Buffalo bounce, and one was neutral. I'm not going to dis on the kid for that, you're right it was tough conditions. But being sure-handed while only catching 25% of the punts is not what McDermott's expecting, bet on it.
  21. How many more teams does he need until the "9 mistakes" refer to the teams who drafted/traded for/signed him?
×
×
  • Create New...