FireChans

We stopped them on third down and they punted right after that.

The TO meant if we didn't recover the onside, we would have no chance to touch the ball again on offense. This is what happened If we had 3 TO's, we had a chance to not recover the onside and still touch the ball on offense. This is what couldn't happen because we called TO. As I said above. So it made the chance of that zero.

It made it zero. We didn't touch the ball on offense. The game ended without the offense touching the ball. 0% chance to kick a field goal on offense because we never got the ball on offense. That's why I keep asking you if you understand.

Yes I believe we could have. I'm not sure if it would have happened. I do know we forced them to punt anyway, so clearly that was a possibility. I'm sure it didn't happen because it didn't have a chance to happen because we called that TO. I don't care if it had a 1% chance of happening. The Bills' decisions made it 0. That's losing football.

We had a shot at onside kick regardless of the TO situation. The difference between getting the ball back with little time left after a 3 and out and having a chance to get down the field and kick the FG vs never touching ball again on offense was the difference between having 3 TO's or 2 TO's. The Bills effectively guaranteed they would not touch the ball on offense if they didn't recover the onside by taking that TO. Do you understand that?

Do you understand the difference between it likely not happening and guaranteeing it can't happen?

Instead they punted the ball and we never touched it again.

This is 100%, WRONG. If you force a 3 and out with all 3 TO's, you would have maybe 40-45 seconds, not 25. Anyone know if a great QB has ever gotten a FG to win a game with 40 seconds left?

Do we win last night with anyone else at QB? No. Do we win last night with anyone else at HC? Yes. How long are we going to allow this to continue?

How many more first and second round picks can we spend on the DL

Yeah we had arguably our best defender with the best chance of stopping Nakua play him all night and he just got abused. Elam can’t really play inside though so it doesn’t really matter if he was active or not. I think Ingram would do better than Elam in that scenario.

Carter in limited time has played better than Eddy imo. Ed has not looked like a $20M man this season. Maybe he has something nagging we don’t know about.

What about any negative thing? 9 guys on the field for the last play of the game? Mismanaging timeouts? does the head coach share blame?

You dont have to choose with 3 TO's

Are you saying you don't know what McD did well, but you're confident there's something he did?

Technically, I think we technically have to blame it on the stadium being built on the burial ground

Not to mention, our offense outscored the Rams offense.

Technically, McD gets credit for Josh having a better understanding of time, score and situation than him because he’s the HC.

I haven’t the slightest idea what you mean. This is the first time we have ever spoken I think.

There’s a much better chance a drafted QB has a worse career than Tyrod Taylor,

What do you think he did well tonight? See here’s the thing. I can answer what Benford did well tonight, despite the defenses poor performance. I can answer what Josh did well tonight. Or Shakir. Or Mack freaking Hollins. And yet everyone weeping crocodile tears for the poor, maligned, defensive HC that got ripped apart AND bungled the end of game situation cannot answer a SINGLE THING he did well tonight. lmao.

Thank you. I thought I was the only one who got a chill down my spine when I looked into those eyes.

What do you think Sean McDermott did well tonight?

Okay. Being unable to answer a single thing that McDermott did well tonight is such an incredible self-own. Can’t make this stuff up.