Giuseppe Tognarelli

@ LAR (SNF): W TEN (MNF): W @ MIA: L @ BAL: L PIT: W @ KC: L GB (SNF): W @ NYJ: W MIN: W CLE: W @ DET (Thanksgiving): W @ NE (TNF): W NYJ: W MIA: W @ CHI: W @ CIN (MNF): W NE: W 14-3

Bills are complete as hell. Maybe just another DB and TE for those final two practice squad spots?

It's Demark, not Denmark, unfortunately

I wouldn't be shocked if the Colts pick up someone else, cut Haack, and the Bills bring Haack back.

Source???

The thread title is not anywhere close to the actual content.

Very disappointed in Sal M. and Jay Skurski this morning.

I disagree with this completely. I think the Bills have proven this is not true.

This makes literally no sense People making this point are really silly because it's completely hypothetical and the Bills haven't given you an indication one way or another. In fact, if anything, they've given you indication that the result would be the same. I feel like people just want to be upset

Wait, what?

But why? Do teams have to have reasons to cut players? You don't see the NFLPA complaining about other cuts. Are performance-based cuts flagged a certain way or something?

I feel like the fact that he was in street clothes and the plate was taken off his locker tells us everything we need to know.

I can't believe I'm seeing people slam Sean McDermott on here this morning. That is a man who is suffering, angry, and deeply committed to doing the right thing.

After McDermott's press conference, it is abundantly clear that, as I theorized, the Bills only had light knowledge of these accusations prior to yesterday, and they were probably misled. I think Araiza will be cut once they're back in Buffalo.

Here's what I think. *The Bills knew of a rape accusation, but not the details outlined in the documents, when they released Haack. Their conclusion that it wasn't true was based on incomplete information. *They had probably previous assured Araiza that they would not cut him, so now they're struggling between public pressure and keeping their word to Araiza. *The Bills have shown a willingness to stand by players in the past while allegations played out. *I trust Beane and McDermott to do the right thing, and I suspect they are privy to more information than we the fans are. *Araiza has admitted to having consensual sex with a girl who told him that she was 18 and attending college. This is per the TV interview with Araiza's lawyer. Having said all of that, I have changed my mind about cutting him. It would be simply unfair. Anyone in this situation should be suspended with pay until the truth is known. How would you feel if you were wrongly accused and it cost you your dream career? Even suspending on allegations alone is morally questionable, but I think it's the fairest option, all parties considered.

Cut him.

This is not from Good Morning Football so should not be merged with that thread or no one will see it.

Could you provide a link? I Googled and can't seem to find this article.

He has.

Undertaker

I don't think Allen needs friends from college on the team anymore.

I don't think he is. This isn't a predictive thread; it's a what-I-would-do thread. What has he shown? Why is he necessary?

Interesting.

Not at all... I don't think he's rosterable or worthy of a practice squad spot. He's terrible and doesn't really have potential, IMO, which is why I put a TBD OT on the practice squad instead of him Hart over Mancz? Who is backup center then?