daz28

At least you're admitting that your reality in PPP is far from actual reality, and keeping it a cesspool is a top priority. The fact you all laughed that the idea Jared used his considerable position in government policy making couldn't possible have anything to do with him receiving $3 billion, while a laptop with the words "big guy" are indisputable proof that Joe Biden is corrupt over a lousy $200k.

Better access to birth control from the Jesus freaks isn't a bad idea either. It all comes from their BELIEF that sex is for reproduction only, and shouldn't happen out of wedlock. Bottom line, keep your religion out of other people's business, when it has no bearing on your own personal life whatsoever. These people fight tooth and nail to the point that they believe the institution of marriage belongs solely to them. As is stands right now, religion>discrimination.

No it does not. There is currently a total artificial heart. If having a heart makes you human, I guess people with them aren't human then. How long does the heart you described last outside the mother. Imo, any fetus that can't live outside of its mother, is part of the mother, which is part of her bodily autonomy, no matter what someone else's Bible says. if the Constitution says you have a right to privacy in your 'persons, houses, papers, and effects', then CERTAINLY you have a right to privacy in your bodily autonomy. Only a fool would argue against that.

It's this level of idiocy: The Biden family is corrupt, and is in cahoots with the CCP, while Kushner's firm, Affinity Partners, has amassed roughly $3 billion, 99% of which has come from overseas. Some of the largest chunks have come from foreign governments where the US government has a strategic interest, like Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Qatar. Hunter was NEVER in the White House, and never was ordered to be given top-secret clearance after it was denied. He was never entrusted with brokering peace in the Middle East, building a border wall, reforming the criminal-justice system, pursuing diplomacy with China and Mexico, and creating an “Office of American Innovation” dedicated to revamping how the government works. They are in a CULT.

All you know for a fact is she had a diary, and someone may have stolen it. There's currently no evidence that what you're claiming is in it is actually in it, much less if it's a false memory or anything else. The only thing you're believing is what Project Veritas is claiming. Are you just mad that it's not moving the needle as much as you'd like it to? Are you mad that it's 91 felonies(that are all politically driven lawfare) vs was in the shower with dad? Don't believe what you hear with your own ears.

As I've already said, and the courts have already agreed with me a long time ago, the issue should be about viability, yet that's not good enough for the religious. You're not a human being when you're a mass of cells. Heartbeat is the silliest argument, because it is based on the old adage that the heart is something besides a muscle with valves, that circulate blood. Also keep in mind, that one party fights against access to birth control. Ironically, they're the ones that hate abortion. There's absolutely ZERO chance that a large group of them will EVER be ok with any compromise, which means this issue will NEVER end.

Just admit that you don't really know the facts, and that you're spit-balling 100%.

So if dysfunctional Washington wasn't dysfunctional Washington, we'd actually be able to solve some issues. The loyalty to trump thing has made what used to be extremely difficult into the impossible, and you can thank his threats to primary anyone who disagrees with him for that. If it has to be ultra maga vs everyone else, then EVERYONE loses. The "only I can fix this" doctrine. Honestly, the best outcome might be that he wins the election, then after 4 years we can finally move on from this. Every day I think more and more that this is what's best for the country.

Again, this is why it's important that republicans make it clear if it's murder or not. As usual with them, they spout what their religious zealotry compels them to say, then they have to walk it all back when the legality/feasibility/electability of the issue is looked at under even the tiniest of scrutiny. if it's murder, then EVERYONE involved, or who even knew anything about it, is complicit in the murder. Instead of admitting their ignorance, they just attempt to move in a manner to circumvent the obvious pitfalls of their follies. Iow, they don't care about these peskie legal issues, because the holy book is all that matters. That and pandering to their gerrymandered districts.

That rhetoric IS used. I added this to my last post, as I thought I'd get no takers: I removed the trap warning, so I may as well get to the gist. trumps(and the SCOTUS) 'stated position' is that different states will be allowed to define what a "person" is differently, and that what will be considered a murder in some states, will be a medical procedure in others. To quote Irv, what a mess. They decided that Congress must enforce the Constitution. Ironically, they then took the case to decide if the immunity clause is self-executing. Iow, they're saying they can be hypocrites any time they want, and it's their right.

Ok, I guess if we're going to play the silly game of, 'I pretended I couldn't understand your question, because I didn't want to have to answer it', I'll rephrase it: Does anyone know if LAWMAKERS IN red states are saying that abortion is murder, or if they just break social mores? I removed the trap warning, so I may as well get to the gist. trumps(and the SCOTUS) 'stated position' is that different states will be allowed to define what a "person" is differently, and that what will be considered a murder in some states, will be a medical procedure in others. To quote Irv, what a mess.

Does anyone know if red states are saying that abortion is murder, or if they just break social mores? Caution, this is a trap.

Try Google, but more importantly, attach yourself to the subject enough to discern what's factual. I'm not your personal Brittanica. Yo-yo meant that they change policy every generation, creating political drama, that they use to distract the uneducated. Imagine the horror of well written out statutes, that aren't secular. Sounds like a good time to drop a Hunter BAWMBSHELL!!!

Whatever 'IT' is. You know how like the slaves and the indians lost. That kinda lost. The right will cry reverse racism or some crap. They won't care. It's called irony, and it's nothing new to, and even mirrors, history. Probably why Jesus added the "love the least of" clause, because where we got spat out is 100% random. I mean you could just gerrymander them out of having any electoral effect, but as some of us have learned, that is just a band-aid. Maybe MAGA fascism can end this country the "commies" call a free democracy.

Oppenheimer is your research/background? I'm well aware of the Nazi rise. I have no love for the far right or far left, and for neither political party. All I look for is my(our) freedoms, and compromises from moderate parties for the good of all. I very specifically said well-written Amendments, that would clear up the issues that a yo-yo SCOTUS can't fix. I'm not going anywhere. You'll have to load me on the train. Would never accept your sympathy. May God have mercy on your soul! LOL

I wish the rich men north of Richmond understood that women are coming, and there's not a damn thing they can do about it, except maybe make some laws now to protect men from when it eventually happens. In 50 years men will be begging for REGULASHUNS to protect them, and they'll blame it on this woke generation. The truth is, men lost, and there's fewer of them.

We've BEEN disenfranchised, but not in the ways you're claiming. Your 'deep state' is people doing their jobs, and I'd love to hear your idea on how you do those jobs w/o people. The real lawfare has been being playing out in Congress for a while, but it's about smearing, not justice. No legislating, no justice just investigating. The system is so rigged against you and I, that it's impossible to even attempt to change it. Our only chance is intelligent, informed voting, and somehow the vast increased access to knowledge has made that nearly impossible. We're not going to put a stop to anything, my friend, but as long as we hold onto civil conversation, it keeps them scared. It's not the false info that's the existential threat, it's the thought of it breaking communication that is. I'm not telling anyone to ignore NC, instead I'm showing you how he's perpetuating the fascist agenda. I think truth soashul is an absolute (worthless)cesspool, but I'm glad it exists. Do you know who the fascists #1 enemy was in the 1930's? They launched their platform on labeling commies, and proceeded onto other 'undesirables' as they gained more power. So you'd agree that any state(world view term) should not have any restrictions on your indelible freedom to bodily autonomy, or are you still insisting the state owns that? Is it even possible that ANYTHING could be more personal than your own body?? Should the government, better yet, should a non-secular government have any need whatsoever for your bodily autonomy? I mean if they can do that, then how on Earth could you expect to be secure in your "persons, houses, papers" if you're not even secure in your own body?

So you'd agree that any state(world view term) should not have any restrictions on your indelible freedom to bodily autonomy, or are you still insisting the state owns that? Is it even possible that ANYTHING could be more personal than your own body??

You don't see how trump would be president if "Mike Pence did the right thing"? The "loyalist' almost pulled it off, except for ONE guy, and the PATRIOTS at the DOJ, that threatened to all quit. I really hope your bubble isn't that thick. Tell me factually, what part of what I just said is incorrect. So you always been whacka?

To be fair, that applies to ALL of them. The key is not to fall into EITHER side's narrative. Falling into a cult is the worst case scenario, though. They have. If one disagrees with an argument, then the rest have to label them. NC has taken it a step Fuhrther, and wants the cult insulated here from ideas. Soon all you'll have here is silly memes and arrows with unfair, even ridiculous, labels for the posters you haven't censored(self-banned). Why he doesn't just go to BF, instead of trying to make this the carbon copy, is unclear. I'd assume it's because he wishes he had his own lil' DR's paradise.

With a name like yours, I don't even have to bother to try to label you, like the external forces, that control thoughts, want everyone to do. Wacka will suffice. Karen is the biggest offender. He wants to label, censor, and if possible, remove access to other opinions and sources. Probably more fascists than communist, but we'll stick with fascists for now, because it's funnier watching you guys misuse commie. You prefer loyalist?

The president probably has the least say of any player in the abortion issue anyways. Luckily, we have a deep state DOJ that has policy, and doesn't just do what the executive says to do under his understanding, or lack of or degree of respect for, the law. If people didn't refuse to walk out en masse, then we wouldn't even be talking about the fake electors plot, because the people who orchestrated it would still be in power.

He's saying whatever he thinks gets him the most votes. Ultimately, he's already had the effect they were looking for by court stacking. You don't believe you have a right to privacy? Should your medical records be the ward of the state? By that definition, they also control your treatment.

Bodily autonomy is privacy. 14th Amendment. Privacy is the KEY to freedom. It means that what I do, if it has no bearing on you, is none of your business. The courts had already figured out that what I said was the common sense answer, with respect to viability, is the best solution. This whole issue is just Christo-fascists trying to have their way. Totally agree that we need new amendments for a changing world, but the slippery slope people pretend that an ever-changing SCOTUS is better than having well-defined articles. Like trusting former lawyers, who's job it is to twist laws, to give impartial interpretations is a great idea. If they were to put bodily autonomy on the docket for an Amendment, would you be for or against it?

Sorry, but this isn't a correlation/causation argument. The pro-life movement is a religiously driven movement, make no mistake. The more Christian you are, the more pro-life you are, and while nearly nothing is 100%, this is very close to it. My base point is that you're not free if the state, and I said 'state' before for a reason, is taking away any freedoms, which are fortunately defended by my country, even though they are basic indelible HUMAN rights. If I sound like a founding father, that's good, because I'm trying to. If you'll note, I already pointed out that abortion doesn't impress anything upon anyone else. That's the issue. The only thing being impressed is someone else's religion. I think these dummies forgot that Alabama DID do just that. The only thing that stopped them is the fear of losing votes. They basically tried to see if they could get away with it. It's the trump/GQP way. HMMM. Short memories.