daz28

Do you feel that he should have been prosecuted federally? Would it be ok if the rich basically bought up all the bad info that could be found out about them to win elections, basically leaving voters in the dark about the facts.

The problem is that some people aren't capable of looking at crime statistics, and realizing that red states are worse. Listening to Newsmax and posting crimes from blue states by Twitter hacks makes you dumber.

If you said you knew anything about prosecutions, you'd be lying your ass off. I personally witnessed a judge in traffic court tell an old man that he could leave, and that he should have never been ticketed to begin with. There was an audible moan, but it's just a fact that an old feeble man in court is going to get sympathy. I'd be fine with them charging Biden, Pence, Hillary, and whoever else, but I also do understand why a prosecutor feels that a jury would be sympathetic to Biden. Fwiw, I also do understand why people are upset that the prosecutor labeled a guy running for president as someone who would get sympathy from a jury, but it's the truth(and it's quite sad honestly).

I did take positions, and that was that it's possible there were nefarious actions/intentions. I'm not going to sit here and claim that I know one way or the other. Selective prosecutions are and always have been an issue. The fact that there is less 'selective prosecution' for the rich and powerful has always bothered me. What Bragg prosecuted trump for may be ticky tack, but that act doesn't happen very often. What they prosecuted Hunter Biden for they could prosecute probably 10 million or more Americans for. To me that's EXTREMELY selective.

It's kind of humorous that you believe people have the right to spread deadly infectious diseases to other living persons freely, yet are for protecting fetuses. Do you think it should be a crime to knowingly pass AIDS to another? Almost all people are against killing babies, but you want to equate that to aborting a fetus.

Everyone who realized what state right it was that they wanted, which led to the Civil War.

Not every misstep falls under that doctrine, and these supposed missteps have been intentionally overblown by Twitter hacks.

That has been explained ad nauseum, but the rhetoric must go on. I'm pretty sure they explanation didn't include, "because he's a democrat" anywhere.

So states rights only when they're convenient. LOL. I'm actually loving that they are bringing all their rhetoric to the place where the truth kills it. They were betting that their hand-picked justices would give them everything they wanted, but thank God they aren't. So far I'm loving the handmaiden.

It's going to be hilarious watching a presidential candidate have to invoke the 5th as every answer, before he pivots to exaggerations and outright lies.

Good. The first step towards recognizing bodily autonomy. Now try to imagine the right wing hacks on the court trying to explain why you should have to wait for the possible life-threatening emergency to happen before you can get what would have been the lifesaving procedure prior to it happening.

Just a reminder that if this photo is your shot at TOTAL EXHONERATION!, then you're screwed. Everyone knows he's guilty, so let's put the system on trial instead. That playbook is becoming extremely tired.

Jack Smith just released specific discussions trump allegedly had to undermine and/or cover up the classified documents retrieval, and are very damning. Andrew Cuomo might be right, but does that mean that we shouldn't bring up politicians on charges they are guilty of? Best case scenario is they are ALL held accountable. The former intelligence agents said they had seen the hallmarks of Russian disinformation, which they did. Did they do so for nefarious reasons? Possibly, but they weren't lying. The GQP, on the other hand, has been using the laptop for 4 years as nefarious political fodder via Congress. You get way too caught up in GQP talking points, Lenny. At least you're willing to listen to why they are mostly bogus. Imagine us being in a crooked culture for so long, that we had forgotten that THIS was the original problem.

Here's what the REAL government's hands on people's private companies looks like: Sept. 29, 2023, 9:33 AM EDT / Updated Sept. 29, 2023, 10:08 AM EDT By Lawrence Hurley WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday waded into the divisive issue of online censorship by agreeing to decide the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas that seek to prevent social media companies from banning users for contentious rhetoric. The laws, backed by Republicans, have been characterized by their supporters as hitting back at alleged censorship of conservative speech by liberal-leaning social media companies, although the Supreme Court’s ruling could have broader impacts. How can the government stop CeNsOrShIp? Easy, by creating laws that tell people how to run their businesses. If you want your Nazi rhetoric heard, then go ahead and elect them, but don't tell others they have to support your nazi rhetoric. If you don't have to bake a cake for gays, then why should you have to let Nazis post on your board? I remember a conversion with "Brad" about how if he didn't find 11k votes that a lot of people would be unhappy, and that it may even be illegal. Not coercion at all, right? Yet another "perfect phone call".

Quite the opposite actually. The court ruled that he failed to prove there was pressure and coercion. Just curious if there was any pressure when trump, as president, calls Fox news to complain about what they were airing?????

Thank God the handmaiden and kegstand Brett still require EVIDENCE. Read Alito's dissent, and tell me he's not part of the GQP cult, who are fine with handing out rulings based on their feelings. The government can suggest anything they want as long as they aren't pressuring anyone to act on their behalf. Now all we need is someone to bring a case up when the GQP openly threatens social media companies for not operating in ways that support them. THAT is your proof of ACTUAL coercion.

Dudes who expose the deep state and illuminati from their pickup trucks might be the funniest thing I've ever seen.

STILL thinking that "the big guy" is a smoking gun provable in court?? LMFAO The GQP has had the laptop and the bullhorn for going on 4 years, and nothing.

Held in contempt by people who held contempt for Congress themselves. Not even mentioning the people who were contempt, and pardoned by trump. If we're going to have a completely absurd government, then Biden needs to just play by the same dirty rules, and pardon anyone who doesn't feel like speaking the truth to the American people. Just curious what the legitimate legislative purpose the GQP was claiming, or do you guys not even care about that part anymore?

You should have always been blunt. I literally just told you "Same standard for all is fine with me", and your response was that??? You're basically trolling me.

She didn't give a false reason why they weren't listed. She did include them last year, but for some reason they were never disclosed until now. Also, they happened before they were required to list them, I believe. Not trying to make excuses for her, but at least she isn't making up nonsensical reasons why she forgot she took a private jet to Bali to go on a mega-yacht. Inadvertently omitted doesn't even make sense. Fwiw, I don't care if they're left or right. Same standard for all is fine with me. Lying, failing to disclose, and being conflicted are three separate issues.

John Oliver already covered this during the last Tentgate. Turns out it was Amazon's choice, but you were close.

That's yet another issue.

"Under Democrat control of the Senate, we've seen runaway spending"- Mr. Sheehy doesn't understand the very simple civics 101 principle that the House controls spending. The REPUBLICAN House.

Because he lied about it. Same problem I have with Alito. The highest justices in the land shouldn't be bold-faced liars. "Inadvertently omitted???". It seems that Alito's letter to Congress was also not truthful as well.