
daz28
Community Member-
Posts
5,331 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by daz28
-
Talking about missing the trees for the forest, this is EXACTLY what SHOULDN'T be happening. Mike Davis is saying that Obama COULD have INTENTIONALLY conducted drone strikes on American citizens, and SHOULDN'T be able to be prosecuted for it. The one and only hope is that the people murdered weren't people that his party wanted murdered, and they impeach him AFTER the dmage has been done. Oh yeah, for those who lack knowledge of the presidents powers, he could immediately adjourn Congress indefinitely, making his impeachment impossible. Not only is the GQP straight dumb, but they lack the 'common sense' that they claim to hold over the democrats.
-
The vast majority of abortions occur during the first trimester of a pregnancy. In 2021, 93% of abortions occurred during the first trimester – that is, at or before 13 weeks of gestation. Is "fetus" in quotes for a reason? Are you arguing that words don't matter? First, no one is pro-abortion. It's pro-choice, and again words matter. What gives you the right to control someone else's bodily autonomy? I respect your right to have an opinion on the matter and debate, but not your right to change words to alter said reasonable debate.
-
Yes, but word have meanings and they matter. By using your logic, every person who murders someone murdered a child, because they were once one, right? Late term abortions are a whole different thing altogether, and I'm not for them. That's basically trumps only argument is they're killing all kinds of babies "even after they're born". The real statistics do not support that in any way. The vast majority of abortions are NOT late term.
-
Aliens - Do they exist among us? What say you?
daz28 replied to phypon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I may look it up for entertainment purposes, but my tin foil hat is basically just one layer of dollar tree foil. Listening to people try to create their own narratives is nails on the chalkboard to me. -
Aliens - Do they exist among us? What say you?
daz28 replied to phypon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
That idea is based on that all life is malevolent and none benign. We can't even begin to fathom the types of beings that may be out there, and how/what they derived from. The only thing that I contrive from Fermi is that IF aliens were malevolent, they would never make it here, so we should have no fear of them coming to kill us. If there are benign beings, then we are safe, and it's hopeful to one day meet them to learn much from them, including how to be good to one another. Maybe Jesus was an alien, and we just didn't listen, but pretend that we do. -
Do you feel that he should have been prosecuted federally? Would it be ok if the rich basically bought up all the bad info that could be found out about them to win elections, basically leaving voters in the dark about the facts.
-
Soft on crime Democrats - the system is the problem?
daz28 replied to Big Blitz's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
The problem is that some people aren't capable of looking at crime statistics, and realizing that red states are worse. Listening to Newsmax and posting crimes from blue states by Twitter hacks makes you dumber. -
If you said you knew anything about prosecutions, you'd be lying your ass off. I personally witnessed a judge in traffic court tell an old man that he could leave, and that he should have never been ticketed to begin with. There was an audible moan, but it's just a fact that an old feeble man in court is going to get sympathy. I'd be fine with them charging Biden, Pence, Hillary, and whoever else, but I also do understand why a prosecutor feels that a jury would be sympathetic to Biden. Fwiw, I also do understand why people are upset that the prosecutor labeled a guy running for president as someone who would get sympathy from a jury, but it's the truth(and it's quite sad honestly).
-
I did take positions, and that was that it's possible there were nefarious actions/intentions. I'm not going to sit here and claim that I know one way or the other. Selective prosecutions are and always have been an issue. The fact that there is less 'selective prosecution' for the rich and powerful has always bothered me. What Bragg prosecuted trump for may be ticky tack, but that act doesn't happen very often. What they prosecuted Hunter Biden for they could prosecute probably 10 million or more Americans for. To me that's EXTREMELY selective.
-
It's kind of humorous that you believe people have the right to spread deadly infectious diseases to other living persons freely, yet are for protecting fetuses. Do you think it should be a crime to knowingly pass AIDS to another? Almost all people are against killing babies, but you want to equate that to aborting a fetus.
-
Everyone who realized what state right it was that they wanted, which led to the Civil War.
-
Not every misstep falls under that doctrine, and these supposed missteps have been intentionally overblown by Twitter hacks.
-
That has been explained ad nauseum, but the rhetoric must go on. I'm pretty sure they explanation didn't include, "because he's a democrat" anywhere.
-
So states rights only when they're convenient. LOL. I'm actually loving that they are bringing all their rhetoric to the place where the truth kills it. They were betting that their hand-picked justices would give them everything they wanted, but thank God they aren't. So far I'm loving the handmaiden.
-
Good. The first step towards recognizing bodily autonomy. Now try to imagine the right wing hacks on the court trying to explain why you should have to wait for the possible life-threatening emergency to happen before you can get what would have been the lifesaving procedure prior to it happening.
-
Just a reminder that if this photo is your shot at TOTAL EXHONERATION!, then you're screwed. Everyone knows he's guilty, so let's put the system on trial instead. That playbook is becoming extremely tired.
-
Jack Smith just released specific discussions trump allegedly had to undermine and/or cover up the classified documents retrieval, and are very damning. Andrew Cuomo might be right, but does that mean that we shouldn't bring up politicians on charges they are guilty of? Best case scenario is they are ALL held accountable. The former intelligence agents said they had seen the hallmarks of Russian disinformation, which they did. Did they do so for nefarious reasons? Possibly, but they weren't lying. The GQP, on the other hand, has been using the laptop for 4 years as nefarious political fodder via Congress. You get way too caught up in GQP talking points, Lenny. At least you're willing to listen to why they are mostly bogus. Imagine us being in a crooked culture for so long, that we had forgotten that THIS was the original problem.
-
Here's what the REAL government's hands on people's private companies looks like: Sept. 29, 2023, 9:33 AM EDT / Updated Sept. 29, 2023, 10:08 AM EDT By Lawrence Hurley WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday waded into the divisive issue of online censorship by agreeing to decide the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas that seek to prevent social media companies from banning users for contentious rhetoric. The laws, backed by Republicans, have been characterized by their supporters as hitting back at alleged censorship of conservative speech by liberal-leaning social media companies, although the Supreme Court’s ruling could have broader impacts. How can the government stop CeNsOrShIp? Easy, by creating laws that tell people how to run their businesses. If you want your Nazi rhetoric heard, then go ahead and elect them, but don't tell others they have to support your nazi rhetoric. If you don't have to bake a cake for gays, then why should you have to let Nazis post on your board? I remember a conversion with "Brad" about how if he didn't find 11k votes that a lot of people would be unhappy, and that it may even be illegal. Not coercion at all, right? Yet another "perfect phone call".
-
Quite the opposite actually. The court ruled that he failed to prove there was pressure and coercion. Just curious if there was any pressure when trump, as president, calls Fox news to complain about what they were airing?????