daz28

This will be a fun question come debate time. "What exactly is a wokie military. Were you referring to any certain group of people in the military there?"

I have no issue with anyone following a traditional role or any other role. It's just that role, which kept women down then, is even more dangerous for them now. Being left with a few children is a sentence to life on social services for the stuck mothers. The current model of college, career, family is what works best now. Butker is a 28 years old rich kid(thanks some to his mother). He has no notion of the poverty that women who may take his advice could go through.

Ya this bothers me more than 2 SCOTUS justices standing behind Jan 6th. 🙄

You'd think by 90 years old you'd know what totally berserk meant. Then again to his ancient self, swatting a fly off your shoulder is going berserk. Let's make it about the judge and not Costello or trump. Thanks Al. LOL

The only problem with me quoting trump is that he was probably lying. LOL A cap here and there is for emphasis. ALL caps is yelling. If the biggest complaint you have about the facts I posted is trumps probably lying, then I AM DOING GREAT!!! Does don the con come off as a tool when he tweets, TODUHL EXHONERASHUN!!!, TOO?

So two SUPREME COURT justices, who either themselves or spouse were behind or in support of Jan 6th, which aren't recusing themselves, is a big yawn to you, but the idea that someone's kid in politics got rich off their dad's status, POTENTIALLY(nothing found yet) is bothering. One guys claim, because he probably didn't get security clearance, said part of the investigation was non-standard. OK. I'll be keeping an eye on the one thing, because it MAY be bothersome, but the justice part that already happened, I'm finding VERY bothersome. I'd rather the guy put up a KKK flag, than a stop the steal flag. I'll deal with a bigot over a traitor any day.

Except that the numbers listed in the strategic PERTOLEUM reserve ARE actually crude oil(A fact I found not you), so I wasn't wrong at all. I even led you to the chart(that you likely purposely ignored) that shows what our crude oil reserves have been since 1900. The Yom Kippur war, which eventually drew both the United States and the Soviet Union into indirect confrontation in defense of their respective allies, WAS the reason for the gas crisis, which caused the formation of the SPR(which is the crude oil reserves in ONLY 4 specific locations). Trump-“So, after 50 years of being virtually empty, I built up our oil reserves during my administration- So yes, it has been historically low, according to Mr. Trump, "VIRTUALLY EMPTY'. and remember he's only referring to those 4 specific locations known as the SPR, when he says that So if and I mean if I was wrong about anything, it wasn't anything you documented to be false. The crude oil reserve DID increase under Obama more than at any time in history, according to the EIA chart: U.S. Crude Oil Reserves - 110 Year Historical Chart

What major impact? If you mean Hillary correctly claiming there was Russian interference, then the impact of that would have been to STREGTHEN AGAINST it happening again. Was she a sore loser? yup, but you're comparing a mountain in 2020 to a mole hill in 2016. It's actually quite laughable. Making objections is nowhere close to a plot to reinstate fake electors to CHANGE the LEGITIMATE outcome. Did you see how the possibly not lying judge was flying YET ANOTHER flag at his beach house, which was also flown on Jan 6th? Maybe her bad neighbor ALSO had a beach house next to theirs, or an eerily similar bad neighbor like that one??? He's LYING.

I may have made a mistake about one reserve being oil and the other being petroleum, but it doesn't make anything else I said less factual, because it had a 'but' before it. Jesse Kelly is claiming it makes us less safe(treasonously LOL), and we aren't less safe. Instead of the silly argument that Biden is a traitor, I tried to shift the conversation to something that may be actually productive, such as why do we talk so much about oil independence when we're exporting 10M barrels every day, while were importing 8.5M barrels every day. It doesn't make much sense to me at all. At worst, it proves we have more than enough oil to sustain ourselves. Ok, I just found out this is what the EIA considers "PETROLEUM": Petroleum includes crude oil, hydrocarbon gas liquids (HGLs), refined petroleum products such as gasoline and diesel fuel, and biofuels. So maybe I didn't make a mistake at all. If I did, you can have your gotcha moment, but you didn't prove anything to the contrary, AND Jesse Kelly is definitely wrong, because he's a fear mongering hack.

I know he knew what he was saying, but TONS of people were saying he didn't say keep women in the kitchen doing laundry, and cleaning house, because he didn't list those duties. Those duties are implied, because that's literally the job description. Like I said originally, there's too much huh bub about this, but the hypocrisy of those supporting his opinions, while being against players speaking about other causes bothers me. I disagree with him, because it's not 1950 anymore, and that's a good thing for women, because they're more self-empowered now. It's also a slap in the face to families that have stay at home dads.

I think maybe the difference is one is crude oil reserve and the other is a petroleum reserve. It looks we have plenty of oil on hand, and maybe it's just not refined yet. Either way, the 'deletion of our SPR' is purely political, because we have RIDICULOUS amounts of oil reserves AND some of the largest untapped oil fields. If we ever needed to ramp up for war, we could be swimming in it rather quickly. Also, our allies, such as Saudi Arabia, can increase production tomorrow if need be.

There's a large difference between calling it illegitimate, because of the Russian interference, which WAS happening, and setting up a plot between states and with congressmen to change the outcome. I got no love for the democrats in 2016 or Hillary, so that's moot. I would have rather had anyone than trump, but I'm just glad the legit winner took office.

Which is our crude oil reserve. Changing a word in it is only semantics, and the name change was likely due to cold war fear mongering. If you do visit the chart on Macrotrends(from the EIA) check out our oil exports chart that is there also. Our oil exports went from 5 million barrels in 2016 to 10M barrels in 2020. Why did we export double the amount of oil we were shipping out, while we were crying for oil independence at the same time. Also, there is a chart of Saudi oil production, which shows very clearly how they've been manipulating production to keep prices high.

That's when they named it SPR. Surely our crude oil reserves existed before that, and they kept records since at least 1900 that I can find. Google: U.S. Crude Oil Reserves-110 Year Historical Chart

Answer for Julie: because you're a hack, who's just spitting out any tidbit that you find peculiar to feed the frothing mouth breathers.

Except the article is incorrect. Google: U.S. Crude Oil Reserves-110 Year Historical Chart A prosecutor(of the court) decides if charges are brought(law implemented). Not hard to understand. Instead of telling me I'm wrong, tell me WHY I'm wrong. It makes for a much healthier debate.

No, but they are what we have to work with. The right has everyone thinking the judicial system is going rogue against them, but I'd argue they're finally just not sweeping everything under the rug anymore. If the final result is politicians being held accountable, I'm ok with that.

Possibly. They certainly do have a hard on for trump. Not saying he didn't do what they claim, but the last 10,000 congressional investigations have gotten us virtually no justice at all for anything. If anything, all of this partisanship might actually end them covering up for one another constantly. It's the only positive I can come up with out of this whole division debacle.

Is there a reason I'm not attending one right now? If the judge and grand jury felt that he was protected under the PRA, the case would already have been dismissed. In fact, if it were as clear as you're claiming, they wouldn't have even had an investigation.

This is true, but the SOR levels have been traditionally low. They're higher now than during the cold war. It was actually Obama who started raising them. By any historical standard they are not low.

That's not for you, me, Fox news, or trump's lawyers to decide. That's up to the courts who define and implement the laws.

What is spectacular is that they are hearing a case of whether the fake electors plot was a duty of the president, or if he's immune from attempting to steal the election. Spectacularly stupid, and also spectacularly bold.

I'm not fine with it, but I find the rationale reasonable. The rationale WASN'T that he's too senile, it's that a jury/judge would sympathize BECAUSE of that. Go ahead and twist it, though. Anyone with top secret documents they shouldn't have should be charged, but if it's all for nothing a trial makes no sense. See, this is how people who aren't disingenuous post! They literally have video of the files being transported and first-hand witness testimony to corroborate that. What planet are you on today?? They had a grand jury, and now a judge will decide if it should be dismissed. That's how the justice system works. Not everyone agrees with decisions, but they are what they are, and we have to accept them. If there's any monkey business, hopefully it is discovered.

Let me guess, the pine tree flag reminded Mrs. Alito of the nostalgic air freshener that hung in her daddy's 1963 AMC Rambler. Purely a coincidence that it appeared on Jan. 6th. The SCOTUS is part of the slow-moving coup. It's clear as day to anyone who isn't blind or dumb. I wonder if Lenny will think this was ok, too?

Did you read my post, or just miss this one part: I'm all for charging Biden, but the SC already decided it was a losing proposition. Then I went on to explain why Trump obstructing the attempts to regain them was such a horrible idea. Let me ask YOU this: Should he have concealed his attempts to conceal his attempts at keeping the documents after they were requested to be returned? Do you think it would be great if he got off on a technicality? Not only did you selectively ignore what I said about Biden, but you also glossed over the entire portion about 'your side'.