It's the really close games where coaching can have a direct impact on the outcome of the game.
If we consistently got the better coaching in a game, I'd argue we win 3 or more of those 5 games.
Look at what BB just did in the wind game. He turned a very close game into a win with superior coaching.
McDermott turned the same game into a loss with bad coaching.
Are you aware that there is statistically driven data that you can use to your advantage to increase your win probability in a given game?
And that "emotion" should have nothing to do with your in-game decision making process?
Two wrongs don't make a right. Of course we were outplayed and I don't think the refs were the difference in the game, but that doesn't mean the game wasn't horrible officiated, as usual.
There were some HUGE calls in this game made/non made that directly impacted the outcome.
This game is a blowout if Josh isn't playing 110% balls to the wall football.
His running is also one of the most dangerous things we do on offense.
If he gets hurt, so be it. Can't live in fear and he should play his game.
Not only "can" Indy win the game, I think Indy WILL win the game.
It will be a must-watch game for all Bills fans.
But as long as we take care of business against bad teams, we'll be OK.
If we beat NE as well, we're golden.
The vocal, pro-Bills-at-all-costs majority at this forum is often wrong...but eventually they come around.
Notice how the masses are now starting to open to the idea that McDermott is a middling game manager.
Some of us pointed that out several years ago.
Just now on radio:
"Today, Josh Allen had to beat Tampa, had to beat the clock, had to beat the refs, had to beat his own coaching staff" and it was just too much."
-Chris "Bulldog" Parker
He's right.