No_Matter_What

Yeah they did. So did Patriots last year under some bizzare circumstances and it also didn't help them much in January.

Lol this is some wild trade deadline. They got better again but won't help them much vs Bills.

We did major move well ahead of everybody, by adding Von Miller. There is a reason why we are the biggest SB favorites, and that won't change after McCaffrey, Toney, Quinn, Smith and Hockenson moves.

Can you please explain what do you mean by "it's not acceptable"? Serious question. Like you are going to fire him if he does it again? Or you want Bills to get rid of him? Or you stop rooting for the Bills? Or exactly what are you not going to "accept"?

I think they will have problems to attract FAs despite huge cap space this off-season. So they might be trying to balance things out by acquiring some talent with couple of remaining years on their contracts this way. Not saying it's smart though.

It's easy. Chiefs added talented WR with all red flags you can imagine, so obviously we need to make some kind of move, otherwise it is an EPIC fail. I mean, is it hard for you to understand such a flawless logic?

And there it is - updated after Packes win. Next - Browns in W11. The last team to beat in AFC.

Don't do it. AFC is losing 15-17 vs NFC.

Like I said, we are just toying with them, let THEM run the clock, and then stop them when it matters. Brilliant strategy.

I am starting to think this "run defense" is intentional. Let Packers bleed the clock and confuse any future opponent!

We are getting to the point where Rodgers needs to start forcing it, which will result in sacks and/or interceptions.

Everything what is not Moss' fault is Edmunds' fault, in case you didn't notice

We had at least 2 sacks in all games so far I guess we add some more tonight.

Lol this was Josh's first completion

Sorry didn't want to be rude, I should choose words more carefully. I just meant that it really seemed to me that you were saying that you find something what is actually very common (cutting a player recently signed) to be improbable. You also wrote that he "signed a 1 year deal" in the way like it meant something, while it is just a basic way how to put any guy on the roster. You also said you don't know about cap ramifications - it is very easy to find out if you care about cap space and there are none. So to me it sounded you don't know very much about how the roster things work. I apologize if I was wrong a/or rude. As for the cutting Bryant, I agree with basically everything what @Beck Water said in this thread. I'd just add that I didn't realize that cutting Cam Lewis is also an option when White comes back. So its Bryant, Lewis or Hodgins imo. And if it is not Bryant, it is definitely not due to the reasons you stated.

Well I know he is not on the PS, that's why he is a cut candidate Not sure how long you have been following this but this happens all the time. We have a roster spot so we sign a guy, in this case Bryant. Now an All-pro CB comes back from IR, so we cut somebody from the bottom of hte roster. That happens to be Bryant. I'd be shocked if it was anybody else than him or Hodgins, and since we have another WR on IR, and Bryant is 10th DL and won't even dress unless somebody is injured, he is most likely candidate. It doesn't matter that he was signed recently. Edit: It has no cap ramifications. He has no guaranteed money.

Please no. I want to like our players, and he doesn't fit.

Not necessarily, Kumerow was on the 53 roster all the time, so no need to cut Hodgins because of him. But if Tre returns someone need to go, that someone might be Hodgins or Bryant. My money is on Bryant, since Crowder is on IR.

Just a technical note @corta765, Seahawks are 4-3.

This really sucks. For him, and for Jets. That's how NFL works but it still sucks.

It is not really important, but Green Bay remains one of the few (6) teams that were not beaten by Bills in the Josh Allen era. Let's make it only 5 on Sunday!

Well now your crusade is straight up ridiculous.

I think it is absolutely irrelevant how desperate the Packers will be. I mean sure we can lose that game but that has almost nothing to do with their result today.

Comments like this would have value if you listed all your draft choices. Maybe this team is much better than your alternative one because Beane drafted Rousseau, Knox, Davis, Benford and many other players instead of those you were suggesting. It works both ways, but you are cherrypicking his percieved misses to prove your point.

I am going Jags - Giants tonight. Haven't seen them this year, and everybody is raving about Giants and there's Bills connection there, so an easy choice for me. Could be a good one.