Live&DieBillsFootball

For the vast majority of patients, Lasik works very well. Unfortunately, a very few people come out of it worse than before they had it done. I'm legally blind in one eye, so there is no way in hell that I would let anyone try it on my good eye.

Or the more likely scenario, "NYSers will stop buying from Amazon effective June 1st". Lots of other places to buy the same stuff from.

According to this chart: Democratic Popular vote counts If you give Obama the votes for the four caucuses and leave out MI and FL , Obama is ahead by 610,832. I don't see how Clinton can end up ahead by a few hundred thousand votes. Some of the things I've seen show PR with a turnout of 900,000 - 1,000,000. Do you think that they will actually get 2 million votes? I read somewhere that there are 2.5 million eligible voters and another article talked about their polling places being able to handle 1,000,000 voters. The only poll I saw was on April 8th and Hillary was favored by 13%. Even if there were 2 million and she won by 25%, I still don't see how she can make up the 610,000. Do you have a link to other info that contradicts the above link?

Obama wasn't even on the Michigan ballot. How could he lose by a larger margin? I love this new spin: If you add in the votes in the states where the votes didn't count, then Hillary moves ahead in the popular vote even though Hillary was the ONLY candidate on the Michigan ballot. She is not even ahead of Obama if they include Florida. And she is also very unlikely to end up with the popular vote even if she gets to keep the Florida votes. Her only chance of being able to say that she won the popular vote is by including a state where she was the ONLY candidate on the ballot. Yeah, that sounds fair. In summary, 1. She can't possibly win the most delegates. 2. Unless Michigan is counted it is very unlikely that she will win the popular vote. So at the end of the day, Clinton's argument to the superdelegates will be: No, I didn't win the most delegates. No, I didn't win the popular vote. But I still should be the nominee because I won certain states. Yeah, that sounds like Democracy in action.

W-Sept. 7 Seattle Seahawks 1 p.m. L-Sept. 14 at Jacksonville Jaguars 1 p.m. W-Sept. 21 Oakland Raiders 1 p.m. W-Sept. 28 at St. Louis Rams 4:05 p.m W-Oct. 5 at Arizona Cardinals 4:15 p.m. Oct. 12 Bye L-Oct. 19 San Diego Chargers 1 p.m. W-Oct. 26 at Miami Dolphins 1 p.m. W-Nov. 2 New York Jets 1 p.m. L-Nov. 9 at New England Patriots* 1 p.m. W-Nov. 17 (Mon.) Cleveland Browns 8:30 p.m. W-Nov. 23 at Kansas City Chiefs 1 p.m. W-Nov. 30 San Francisco 49ers 1 p.m. W-Dec. 7 Miami Dolphins (at Toronto) 4:05 p.m. W-Dec. 14 at New York Jets 1 p.m. W-Dec. 21 at Denver Broncos 4:05 p.m. W-Dec. 28 New England Patriots* 1 p.m.

Spoken like a true Clinton supporter. She has NO CHANCE of winning the nomination unless she steals it. Yeah, and you're right if Clinton loses, it will be the death of Democracy and the end of life as we know it. It's such a pathetic argument. Hillary was all but given the nomination at the start. She then went on to lose something like 11 states in a row and has no chance of winning the nomination anymore. But now it's all about trying to right a wrong by giving her the nomination because...well...just because. I just wish she and her supporters would STFU. That's my thoughts.

I would go further and enlist prison inmates into the army. You could start with the drug offenders and move on to other low-level inmates. Give them the option of serving their sentence in the army as opposed to prison. We save the $40,000 plus per year to house their asses and make them productive. If they screw up, they go back to jail for the rest of their sentence.

Illio's is good, but the best Italian restaurant in Buffalo is Chef's.

Amen!

Bill Maher on abstinence education in 2005: "New Rule: Abstinence pledges make you horny. In a setback for the morals/values crowd, a new eight-year study just released reveals that American teenagers who take virginity pledges wind up with just as many STD's as the other kids. But that's not all. "Taking the pledge" also makes a teenage girl six times more likely to perform oral sex, and four times more likely to allow anal. Which leads me to an important question: where were these pledges when I was in high school? So, seriously, when I was a teenager, the only kids having anal intercourse, were the ones who missed. My idea of lubrication was oiling my bike chain. If I had known I could have been getting porn-star sex the same year I took Algebra 2 - simply by joining up with the Christian right - I'd have been so down with Jesus, they would have had to pry me out of the pew. And, let me tell you, there is a lot worse things than teenagers having sex. Namely, teenagers not having sex. Here is something you'll never hear: "That suicide bomber blew himself up because he was having too much sex. Sex, sex, sex, nonstop, all that crazy Arab ever had was sex, and look what happened." But among the puritans here of the 21st century, the less said to kids about sex, the better. Because people who talk about peepees are "potty-mouths." And so, armed with limited knowledge and believing that regular, vaginal intercourse to be either immaculate or filthy dirty - these kids did with their pledge what everybody does with contracts. They found loopholes. Two of them, to be exact. Is there any greater irony than the fact that the Christian right actually got their precious little adolescent daughters to say to their freshly-scrubbed boyfriends, "Please, I want to remain pure for my wedding night, so only in the ass... And then I'll blow you, I promise." Well, at least these kids are really thinking outside the box."

The beer sucks but a GREAT commercial:

Fixed it for you.

If he broke it by that much he had to be on the juice. I would have them put the "*" next to his name and put yours back up as the non-cheating record holder.

Bang her once or twice and then tell her that you're just not into her. This way you get to bang her and your friend never finds out about it. Or, bang her and tell her that you're not into a relationship but she can call you late at night for booty calls. If your buddy ever finds out you tell him that you were drunk or that she came over naked and threw herself at you. You feel terrible and would never do it again. Or tell him that you didn't nail her but that she is a psycho and a liar and show him the text messages etc as proof. You might as well tap it before she tries one of his other friends instead of you.

Or, Kraft's attorney's are going to make very comfortable for Walsh. What are the odds that Kraft may try to buy the tapes or pay Walsh to shut up? Don't you think that Kraft would offer this guy a million bucks to forget that this silly incident ever happened? I don't care what happens. The Pats* will forever be known as cheating scum.

Well, I don't think that you can get away with calling them whores, because who other than Bill or Mr Ferraro would want to do them. Now if she had called then C*nts, that would have been much more accurate, and it would have been harder to fire her over telling the truth.

Things to consider...

That's unbelievable. I'm sure that Poojer can fix it though.

Good Post! Most of the problems are lack of foresight. Darcy never saw the big change to long-term contracts until it was too late and then sat on his hands. I don't know how much was TG's fault or if he is just a new fan of the game who gave all of the decision making to his so-called experts. Whoever was in charge made some of the worst decisions in the history of salary caps. A couple of other points: Whoever made the decision to share Rochester was also very short-sighted. We could have had a lot more prospects nearing the NHL instead of spending an extra year in college or junior hockey. Remember a couple of years ago when the Sabres had Ryan Miller, Biron & Noronen. For the last 2 years we have had Miller and the cheapest guy they can find as a backup. Then they make the decision to have Miller play every game. I just feel that if they had a decent backup, Miller would have been better if he had played less than 60 games. His numbers have really suffered in March when we needed him the most.

It would seem to me that due to the huge drops in all bonds, that someone would see a buying opportunity in the better quality stuff. Unless thy're unsure as to whether AAA are really AAA.

Isn't this because the banks are classifying the assets as held-to-maturity while the securities firms are holding them for sale which forces them to mark to market? If the securities firm was holding a secrity to maturity, do they get to treat it as such or do they always have to mark to market? If that was the case then it is indeed unfair. However, I wouldn't think that securities firms would want to hold long term assets to maturity. Don't they want to be more liquid and have the ability to buy and sell frequently?

You have to remember that the article was written when the Bills played at War Memorial Stadium. This was also before Buffalo got the Sabres and Braves. The trashing of the old Rockpile was actually charitable to those who had the (mis) fortune to attend games there. I always heard that the players locker rooms and amenities were horrible also. Good thing that there was no free agency as not many players would have selected Buffalo and the Rockpile as their preferred home. I wonder if the Bills would be in more trouble now if they had built a 60,000 seat dome stadium back then. By now, it would be very much out of date and the lower capacity would only be making it harder to justify keeping the team.

Where, oh where, are the strict constructionist judges that the conservatives love. Good thing that they don't take literally the part about a well-regulated militia as "being necessary to the security of a free State" and prohibits infringement of "the right of the people to keep and bear arms." We're all VERY lucky that Roberts, Thomas, Alito, and Scalia turn out to be activist judges when the conservatives want them to be...

I guess that goes against her vast experience in those eight years. Hell, she wasn't even the one servicing the President let alone jointly making all of the Executive decisions. Tomorrow, Hillary will break out her own stained wardrobe to show that she truly was "on the job" during the White House years.

Awesome!