Jump to content

LyndonvilleBill

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,786
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LyndonvilleBill

  1. Great. 2 3's for Frazier and 2 3's for Boyd. Now I have to change my thoughts on all of my Mock's.๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿคฃ
  2. 4D chess. We don't want them to change QB'S. ๐Ÿ˜
  3. True. And he could already be on the roster.๐Ÿคซ๐Ÿ˜
  4. Tampa. Brady and the Bucs won't need it.๐Ÿ˜
  5. I see it too. I am of the same philosophy as some others. You only draft LT's in the first unless there is a generational talent there (i.e. Quenton Nelson type) and I just don't see it available in the 23' draft.
  6. I like Risner as well, but more than likely to cost double+ what Saffold will. Would you get double the productivity/results? Not sure. Probably the same with Davis? Don't really know anything about Powers, would have to look further.
  7. LOL. Didn't we say the same about Hart? And now look at where we are.๐Ÿ˜ฑ
  8. I definitely don't see them coming out flat. If anything, I think they will be overly jacked up and and may make a couple of boneheaded mistakes but clean it up after the first series.
  9. I'm for new blood, just see it rnd 3 or later and maybe only 1 or 2 at most drafted. Could definitely see a couple of undrafted OL being signed though.
  10. Agree on Bates if Morse retired. As to Saftey. As we've discussed for years now. McD and this staff are excellent at grooming or getting the best out of DB's. If this is truly the case, why would we draft safeties early or often? Both Poyer and Hyde were later round picks and look at what they've done.
  11. We have John Brown already. Why would we add Jackson? It's not speed we are missing, it's someone to catch and hold onto the ball.
  12. It's a new medical test procedure for stress.๐Ÿคฃ
  13. Some of my thoughts as to why they wait until mid to late rounds for OL and may depend on 1 guy, Morse. If Morse returns and finishes his contract, I think our starting 5 are basically already in place. Dawkins, Ike (I like Ike๐Ÿ˜‰), Morse, Bates and Brown. I think Ike returns and they like him, otherwise I don't think they would have kept him this year. Doyle is already here as a SWT. I believe they will re-sign Saffold as he already stated he will do whatever it takes to stay. I also think they will re-sign one if not two of Q, Hart or GVR to have veteran depth or a FA guard(like a Risner?). So you're only looking at some depth and future starters for 24' and beyond. So I just don't see day 1 or early day two picks being used. Plus you still have OT's Anderson and Van Demark on the PS for the past year. May not be popular, but all in all, 3rd or later for OL. Also, Given our track record easing rookies in, I just don't see an early pick being used.
  14. I'd go with Marlowe as well. Maybe Mayden can fill his role on special teams and also be used as a backup safety. ๐Ÿค”
  15. These are some of the reasons why I think both Oliver and Edmunds will accept reasonable offers to stay.
  16. LOL. If you haven't, You should see my early mock in Gunnersbill's mock in the college section.๐Ÿ˜
  17. Agree with being able to bring Lawson back, however, having AJ and Basham there, I think we may need more of a pass rusher to try and pick up what we lose/lost from Von. I really like Lawson, but he would be the odd man out if we decided to get more juice, imo. I'm sure you saw my mock in your other thread. So I'll ask you here. If Mazi Smith was available with our 3rd, would you take him? Or Andre Carter in the 2nd?
  18. Ok, You ready to fire this up? Lawson and Phillips are FA'S, Von is likely out until October, November? I don't think AJ and Basham are the answer opposite of Groot. So... In the 1st. Just kidding.๐Ÿ˜. Wouldn't surprise me though if they did take a DL and/or DE on day 2.๐Ÿ˜‰
  19. I doubt RT will be. Although we seem to be quite challenged finding the right person to fill that spot. Ford, Williams and Brown. I did expect more than what we've seen from Brown this year, BUT, back surgery, new line coach and putting Bates next to him at RG, I can almost understand why my expectations were higher than the results so far.
  20. Based upon this I'd say he'll get 46% this week.๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿคฃ
  21. Maybe. But I doubt they would do that to White for at least a year. Plus wouldn't he be an expensive safety? One of my thoughts on Benford was, he's a little bigger than Tre and has been in the system for a year He could have all of this offseason to transition which may be better than bringing in a rookie. As to the other part, it was more related to the value of a pick. Wouldn't a CB be more of a premium pick than a Saftey? At this point in time, I don't disagree on the Ford pick and I think in hindsight the pick would be different.
  22. I'm not saying early round. Don't think we need to spend an early rnd pick on either. Just questioning an early round safety as to value against a CB. PS. You can take your emoji back now.๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜„
×
×
  • Create New...