Motorin'

Where did I say requiring ID's is racist? And was that a serious comment, or snark?

I'm much more concerned with the potential for electronic manipulation than ballot stealing. Also the idea of spastic antifa ravers engaging in a coordinating ballot stealing effort is kind of hilarious. Something tells me that wouldn't work out so well for them. But you didn't address the actual built in security measures. You get an email that the ballot has been sent. If it doesn't arrive, you are responsible for alerting the board of elections. If the elections board receives your ballot you get a second email that it has been received. That's when you get on the phone and tell them you didn't send in that ballot. The stolen ballot gets thrown out and they send you a new one.

He looked like Beast Mode in that clip. He not only explodes through the safety, but accelerated downfield into the endzone so fast.

I have an obtuse life? Cool story. In Illinois, we have to go online each election and request a mail in ballot. We have to provide our social security #, drivers id #, and address. The we get an email saying that the ballot has been mailed to us and what day we should expect to receive it. After filling the ballot out, we sign it. Our signature can be checked against our signature on our license. Then we mail it back in the envelope provided. As soon as it's received, we get an email from the board of elections saying they received the ballot... If we never received it, we alert the board of elections. If we never received it, and they email us to say they received it from us, we alert the board of elections. I'm trying really hard to imagine a concerted effort to send tens of thousands of people out to stalk the mailman, (or are the mailmen in on it to?) and steal the ballot before I get home and get the mail... Are you also terrified when the dmv mails you your driver's license? In any event, it would be way more efficient to stuff the ballot at the poll where one or two cheaters could add hundreds or thousands of ballots to the mix rather than needing to procure thousands of ballots from thousands of touch points simultaneously...

So you don't really care how voting by mail actually works?

I never said it never happens. I asked for examples. That's you putting words into my mouth to make your case. There are, and should be processes put in place for deceased people to A. Have their state issued ID canceled and B. Removed from the voter register. You've provided no evidence of any concerted effort to fraudulently register dead people to vote. At best you've given examples of deceased people who fell through the cracks and were not removed from the voter roles. At the same time, I don't get the sense that a thorough vetting of these findings have taken place to ensure they are not examples of false positives. More than one person can have the same name after all, and in a state of 40 million people it would not surprise me if 100-200 people have the same name as a dead person. Your assertion the the democratic party has orchestrated anything is as yet 100% unfounded by a single shred of evidence beyond your imaginative conjecture. If evidence of voter fraud by state or party officials does exist, they should absolutely be prosecuted with the maximum force of law. You supply none.

So the examination of LA county's public voter register and the cross reference with the public death records is the same thing as having no cameras red lights? False example. It would be a good point if the records weren't PUBLIC.

Lots of imagination is certainly required. “When you look at the numbers we’re talking about in LA County -- 215 voters out of 4.7 million registered voters in LA -- you’re talking about an error rate that’s .0000453 percent.” What's to stop the the evil Dems from registering all of those non-voters and stuffing the ballots already? How would they go about extracting the ballots from people's mailboxes? Totally false narrative.

I'd love to see proven examples of dead people voting. please? With the vote by mail requirement, in order to vote for a dead person you'd have to have their driver's licenser, register them to vote at the address on the license, go online, request a ballot, input the correct social security number and driver license #, have the ballot sent to the previous address and then steal it from the mailbox. If local officials are so corrupt, they can just have the board of elections stuff the ballots themselves. Way easier than the steps that would be required to perform large scale vote by mail fraud.

Except that in cities that already use vote by mail, they are pre-validated. The voter has to request the ballot online, input the correct social security number, address and state id #. The name, social, state id # and address have to match the same info on the voter registration. It's probably more secure than voting in person in many places.

It would be nice if they allowed single games to be purchased.

I think the Premiere League will play after June 1. Teams need the TV revenue, which is also the main motivation for the German League to start up... Only posted this here bc the NFL should be watching to see how it goes.

This is a big deal for sports around the globe. They have lots of protocols in place. No fans will be in attendance and if fans congregate in front of the stadium it will result in an automatic home team loss. Maybe you hate soccer, maybe you love it. Regardless, game on. https://worldsoccertalk.com/bundesliga-tv-schedule/ The overall results may effect how other major league sports around the world plan their return. Fingers crossed.

That was my other take away from the article, "cocaine's a hell of a drug!"

And just to be on the safe side, he should stay away from the drugs and alcohol.

This probably isn't Ahmaud Arbery. Arbery's skin is significantly darker. And this gets to the point, the McMichael's assumed it was him on the past tapes when they could not have known it was him. And they assumed felonious intent on his part on the day of the shooting. In most of the lynchings that happened to black people in American history, the people conducting the lynching believed the person had committed a crime. They formed a posse and believed they had the right to carry out an execution. The McMichael's had called the police. Yet they felt like they had the right to form a posse and pursue with guns, to detain him at gun point and to shoot him when he fought their arrest. I guess we shall see what Georgia law says about modern day armed posses, and if the federal government steps in.

So he had 2.4% more drops while completing 6% more of his passes. Sounds like more passes were on target to be dropped in the first place.

For many people who actually suffer from the disease of addiction, the idea that it is curable can be deadly. Way too many examples to count of people who went years and years sober, thought they were "cured" which meant they could have just one beer. Relapse can and does lead to death... It's better for sober addicts to fear the disease and know they are never "cured."

The effects of drugs are biological and psychological, thus the effects are not inanimate. Addiction is also a disease, which explains why some people just can't overcome their cravings. Blaming addicts for the actions of drug dealers who capitalize on their illness is off base, in my opinion.

There'd be no drug dealers if drugs didn't have addictive properties.

Interesting, so the alleged scheme to world domination isn't found anywhere in the book that the newspaper clipping cites. But it is in a different book! I'll order it on Amazon today. What was the title? Here's an interesting quote that Alinsky did write, : “So as far as the Communists went, there were several special things that kept me out. Partly it was philosophic…I hate dogma. People who believed they owned the truth have been responsible for the most terrible things that have happened in our world, whether they were Communist purges or the Spanish Inquisition or the Salem witch hunts.”

Are your sure about that? I'd love to see it printed in his words rather than just take your word for it.

Welp there you have it, I stand corrected. It's printed on a geocities looking website, so it must be true! https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-alinsky-social-state/false-claim-saul-alinsky-listed-a-scheme-for-world-conquest-creation-of-the-social-state-idUSKCN2252LY

Do you guys care if this newspaper clipping is false, and that Alinsky wrote none of that?

You don't see the initial face to face confrontation in the video. That part is cut off as the second car pulls over. From all of the available information, the white truck drove past him and then blocked the right lane of the road while the second car drove up from behind. The men in the pickup truck tried to "arrest" him with guns drawn on him. One man in front of the truck with a shotgun, another in the bed of the truck with a handgun. The lawyer who leaked the video thought that the video would exonerate their friends, because in his mind if Aubery had just surrendered to the arrest he wouldn't have been shot. Except in no world that we live in can citizen chase down unarmed persons in the middle of the road, block them in with their cars, draw guns on them and arrest them. That's called vigilante justice. You're discounting that the second car that was filming also had an armed man in it. One car drove past him and blocked the road in front (which you don't see in the video), and one drove up from behind to block the road behind him... I don't think these guy's thought process was "let's go kill us a black man." I think they legitimately thought he was a criminal, and they believed they had the right to take guns, track him down and bring him to justice. Had they actually been uniformed officers, legally they would have had the right to do exactly what they did.