Jump to content

Kelly the Dog

Community Member
  • Posts

    40,269
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kelly the Dog

  1. Thank for the link. I saw that stat a week or so ago and just repeated it, but didn't see the actual stats/games. It surely doesn't really show it to be an indicator of wins. Just for the hell of it I went back and looked at the first six games of last year and it was 32-33.
  2. I triple dog dare you to click on it when I do.
  3. A lot of people don't know this but since 1972, teams that have been "super duper motivated" have actually a lower winning percentage than teams that were "likely very motivated." I know, it doesn't make a lot of sense, but it's a fact.
  4. QBs with 300 yard games have a losing record this year. Edit: that stat is wrong as Bangarang pointed out. It's 32-29. Last year at this point it was 32-33.
  5. Except one knows what they are doing and how to do it and two don't.
  6. I think he was two for two.
  7. Not to mention that he couldn't throw a football and Josh can.
  8. It's somewhat of a subjective call but that was clearly an attempt to pass today. 100%.
  9. Because he is throwing it forward, hence a pass. The fact it got batted backwards doesn't matter. The sack that Oliver got would not be a reception for the receiver because it was a lateral, but when he attempted to pass it became a pass.
  10. I guess even though he went back he didn't attempt to look to throw a pass.
  11. The INT wasn’t even a bad pass. It was a great play by a great player. The play before it was a great play and 8-9 yard loss. They gave up 14 points to the good Fitzy. They were not great, good, bad, or awful. They surely could play a lot better than they did. But while watching I thought they were getting gashed on the ground. But the Fins had 109 yards on 3.6 yards per carry.
  12. He's also supposed to know that he can break three tackles but not four.
  13. Fitzy is Fitzy. He has done this for ten years in a row. It looks like a trend. You realize that don't you?
  14. But in this game he didn't miss any touch passes. The two real ones were perfect. They stood out because he doesn't normally do it. How is that possibly a criticism today?
  15. Exactly. Stats are about the sixteenth best indicator of how Allen plays.
  16. If he played the exact same way in the second half we win 18-14. WORST POSSIBLE GAME EVER!
  17. The two "touch" passes were both perfect. One to McKenzie and one to Duke.
  18. Name one "touch" pass he missed. He was three for three on touch passes. He missed two long balls bad. He needs to hit one or both. Those are not touch passes.
  19. That's insane. 9 points and zero turnovers is worst possible game. He didn't even throw one stupid pass.
  20. That's not a thing. F is the worst possible game. So 9 points and zero turnovers and no horrific passes is the worst possible game. That's not good. That's not total failure. Especially when a perfect pass gets us first and goal that Knox drops.
  21. So having three sacks and a fumble and a few interceptions and a bunch of dumb passes (none of which he had) would be a what, a K? A V?
  22. How is three field goals and maybe one sack and zero turnovers an F?
  23. We were talking about today.
  24. Two Tds and no turnovers is above average. 32 TDs and 0 INT over a season would be by far the best season in the history of the league.
×
×
  • Create New...