Jump to content

Lfod

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,071
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lfod

  1. I wouldn't bet he's not on the roster. Even if I bet he was not the starter my nerves would still be on edge. I think I'd be just about at your percentage. Except I'm 50% on starter maybe 40%. If you can't land an upgrade and your gonna bridge screw it do it with Tyrod. It makes sense economic way. Get that dude an o-line and wr or I'll freak out.
  2. When I say what I do it sounds harsh. I respect Tyrod a lot. I've listed a few times specific things he's done on and off the field that I love. I would also agree that he is better then Nate Peterman. He should be better. It's a sad day for a guy if he's beat out by a first year rookie when he's had more time to strengthen his craft. When they pulled Nate Peterman I didn't question it. It was as brutal as you can get. So yes I have higher expectations of Tyrod then I ever would Nate Peterman. I would hold him more accountable. If Tyrod is the starting QB next year then I'll shut up with my criticism and root for him just like I did this year. My doubt was there but I have not voiced my opinion this strongly at all until the year was over. I think Tyrod can get better. I think Peterman could get better. I wouldn't just shut down any possibility. I think Tyrod made some mistakes and I think Peterman made mistakes. Ones a rookie and ones a solidified 3 year starter. Honestly I think if you took them both and blended them together you might have something. Either give me a Tyrod that takes more risks. I'll understand the interceptions if it comes with more passing TDs. Give me a Peterman who doesn't take so many risks. I'll deal with it looking a bit boring and managed without the crazy interceptions. I was at a point I would rather see Tyrod just force it man. Quit playing so safe because it isn't winning games. If your behind and the clocks ticking force that ball in there then I'll respect the outcome even if it's bad. I got tired of him dropping his posture and throwing it away. That's just giving up. Peterman sucked but I don't think you ever see his body language just say screw it I give up. Even after interception #4 he was still keeping his posture up. I saw the Jags read his body language. They knew Tyrod wasn't gonna make any risky moves so they went in for the kill and took him out of the game. Even they felt disrespected by the lack of effort and put dude on his head. They wanted the next man up because they were getting bored and so was I.
  3. Then your biased. You will make every excuse to for Tyrod but then when it comes to Peterman it's all his fault and the rookie isn't allowed to have a bad start because Dennison only made Tyrod suck and not Peterman. Did all those guys put up average numbers when the defense they played for took the ball away from opponents 13% of the time they touched the ball offensively?
  4. Well I can't argue that some people just have natural talents for things. I wouldn't doubt in some situations a naturally gifted person could become better in a shorter time then a person who practiced and just wasn't gonna be a Mozart. I'm just saying I would have a lot higher expectations from a guy that says he's been practicing piano for 6 or 7 more years then a guy that just started yesterday. I get what your saying but your not seeing my point. First I agreed that chances are he won't be special. I actually did say that. I just said people have strict expectations of him while defending a vet that puts up multiple 3 point games. Just saying. If your not a big Tyrod excuse maker then it wasn't meant for you if you just don't like Peterman. Also I gave the dude credit for acknowledging something others won't.
  5. I don't know if I would call three 3 point games serviceable. If your defence can get you the ball back 13% of the time you punt it back to the opponent you shouldn't have 3 point games. I guess we have different opinions on what a 7 year guy should be capable of. Especially when your defence was a turnover machine all year.
  6. I explained my reasoning. One should be held to higher expectations because of time invested in the game. If I practice Piano for 7 years and you for one I should be a lot better correct?
  7. Well if we talking roster it would be different. I think he is a good back up. If we were talking Tyrod Taylor as the starter game one I would take that action hypothetically. Since I am a man of honor I would only bet what I could afford to pay, so I would say $100. If I was a rich man I would go a lot higher on that amount. In good fun, if non money bets we're allowed if I lost I would PM a picture of myself dressed in a way of the winners choosing holding a sign that said what the winner chose. The picture could be used for whatever the winner deemed necessary. I would also want the same if I was the winner. Now keep mind I'm not a complete Tyrod hater this is actually because I don't think he has any chance to be a starter next year.
  8. You seem very confident about Tyrod and so do a few others. So let me ask you a hypothetical question. What kind of money would you put on Tyrod being the Bills starting QB next year if it was a bet in Vegas?
  9. Honestly thank you for acknowledging this. People will pile on the Peterman for his 5 interception game then excuse Taylor and his 3 point games. I think we can agree the two QBs are at very different stages of the game. One is a rookie and the other has been starting a few years. The anti Peterman crowd is most likely right. He most likely will not be anything special in the future. Does he get three years as a starter after learning behind the scenes for multiple years? Probably not. He was thrown right in. Then had to play back up even if he wasn't ready. I'll give you credit though because I've seen most anti Peterman people crap on him for one game and not say a peep and even defend Tyrod and his multiple embarrassments. It's one way or the other. They both suck or they should both get a grace year because the entire scheme sucked. There is a difference between the two QBs and regardless if anyone wants to admit it or not, we should all have much higher expectations of Tyrod then we should Peterman. Tyrod has had time behind the scenes and on the field and Peterman has not. So in my book Tyrod and his 3 point games is a way bigger embarrassment to the team than Peterman and his one 5 interception game. Except Peterman hasn't had repeat 5 interception games. Tyrod had had multiple 3 point games this season. Who has a bigger chance to learn and grow from the game? A guy who's been several years in the league on and off the field or the guy who has been in it one year and not even a full game played. *Drops mic
  10. I wouldn't give you a free cup of water for that.
  11. I'd throw Tyrod in the trash heap for his 3 point games against the Jaguars, Panthers and The Patriots. I'm not sure about Nate yet. If he sucks as as bad as Tyrod given as much time to find a groove then I'd say toss him. One bad game isn't enough. I sat through a lot of bad Tyrod before I was really done. Although I will have to agree with a few people on this post that he has some work to do to prove he can be viable and it's not looking good.
  12. Truthfully I really never looked into him. I saw you saying he was a process guy. Out of curiosity I figured I'd ask Google and that popped up. I'm definitely sold after reading that. You adding in more about him having a desk puts even more emphasis. I would have to agree with you. He sounds like a guy that would fit right in. I'm late to the party but count me in as being on board.
  13. https://www.google.com/amp/www.nbcsports.com/washington/redskins/kirk-cousins-and-maybe-redskins-fans-its-time-trust-process%3famp "I walk away saying, ‘I’m getting better, I’m doing really good things, I’m about the process, and my process was really good today. I can’t control the outcome but the process was really good. Shaw66 you inspired me to search Kirk Cousins and process in Google. Tyrod never talked like that. I'm $old.
  14. We will sign him to a huge contract and then he will suffer a career ending injury in game 2 or 3 of the season. Then we all get to argue over if the move was stupid or not.
  15. Honestly until it is the Bills in the Superbowl I have about the same level of excitement I usually would have. I haven't even really seen the last few honestly. When I do watch it's because I was invited someplace for the Superbowl party atmosphere. I usually get a laugh from some of the commercials. I'm saying I haven't really been excited for a Superbowl in a long time. It's not me really hating on it. When it's a good match up it's worth checking it out. Yes I think it sucks the Patriots seem to be in it every year and that would be a reason I wouldn't go out of my way to catch the game but I wouldn't avoid it either.
  16. Money is the root of all evil. Sometimes I wish I was a Billionaire just so I can see what kind of messed up stuff people would do for money. Then I would make my own YouTube game show and not only would people participate, people would watch.
  17. "Hey Farva, what's the name of that restaurant you like with all the goofy @#$& on the wall and the mozzarella sticks?"
  18. So he want to be offered a future career in the Bills organization at a reasonable level and he is open to talks about the money involved? I like going out on limbs.
  19. I talked to the Devil and he told me part of the deal was Tom Brady had to lose his last Superbowl. I think this might be the year.
  20. Look I've been supportive of Nate. I've stood up for the rook when people have written him off. I hope your right because I don't wanna look stupid for trying to stay a Petermaniac. If he doesn't start and show some promise I'm done. Even after the 5 interceptions I had the rooks back. Defended the choice to start him. He better be Tom Brady 2.0 or I'm joining your group of haters. I don't like you cheating on him thinking of other Saviors.
  21. I thought this year there was a quote when asked the game plan the opponent said "Make Tyrod be a QB". I must of been mistaken.
  22. I never understood this logic. If it was true the Bills would be undefeated. I think throwing the ball away and taking sacks for a loss of 10 yards and contributing to 3 point games and 3 and outs is losing the game. Having defences stacking the box because there is no passing game is losing the game. Having people say in public to beat the Bills the game plan was make Tyrod be a QB is his part in losing the game. Its people taking advantage of him specifically to win the game is him losing game. It is his name being spoken specifically out loud by more then one opponent using him as a weakness is him losing the game. He doesn't throw interceptions would mean a heck of a lot more if he had two or three passing TDs every game. That's another one thrown around I don't really value. Yes Tyrod can win some games too. I added that just so people don't think I won't acknowledge it.
  23. Yea it's true both Peterman and Tyrod have a few extremist. I can agree it can be over the top when people jump at every chance to trash a player or defend them. I would take either one at QB if it meant the offense didn't suck next year. Tyrod had 3 point games. Peterman threw 5 interceptions. They both have warts man. One had a lot longer to get gud.
×
×
  • Create New...