PrimeTime101

the better question is... who will Your scapegoat be? you have hated the dude for years? how can we trust anything you say on the topic?

I agree. Time to see what McD has. Time for him to call our D. But I want him to have good help. Not some joe schmo ya know?

THERE you go! options! waited to long, but still have to look deep.

not a fan.

no. just my opinion.

and there you go... So our GM/HC turns to our DC and says.... how do you want to leave? and this was the answer

https://www.profootballrumors.com/2023/02/2023-offensive-defensive-coordinator-search-tracker https://www.foxsports.com/stories/nfl/nfl-coaching-tracker-news-rumors-interviews Hire Within? WHO DO YOU WANT!?

yep... and people say "we have been a top 10 defense under him" LOOK AT ALL THE TALENT HE HAD TO WORK WITH! we should be a top 10 D

this depends on who they get... If they find a way to bring a well named DC in the house then its his defense... Not McD. Will McD have his voice in things yes! but unless its another first or second year student? EXPECT changes....

That was a very special situation. A day after being tagged, he ASKED to be traded asap that he did not want to be part of that organization at all. Very rare

you know guys, I did this post to remind us.. we are still a decent team. We are still pulling many of these plays now just as much as the crazy plays we grew to love in our youth nice chill post

nothing to be sorry about. I was just 4 yrs old In 73. Another big one for me was James Loften catch for 74 yards. Made me go... "wow" just like now with many of JA throws

yes! Yes! YES!

here is one

exactly to my point lol This isn't old school madden football with endless cap space lol

this is not Madden Football... do you know how rarely a tag and trade happens in the NFL?

Our mistake started when you lack competition for positions. WR, G, T are the best examples this year. Players are not pushed to what they are capable of doing if they are just given the job without earning it. We did not create or bring in enough talent to compete and bring out the best of these players.. It really is this simple. We could afford to bench a McKenzie for drops the prior year cause we had competition at the position he was in. This year with Davis? Who would replace davis for playing like trash? No one. Thus... it becomes acceptable as time goes on.

to the bolded.... 10000 thumbs up

So... Last year at this time... I suggested that maybe we should contract him then because if he has a really really solid year, then his price tag is going to be so high that one solid year wont justify the worth. If we would of contracted him last year and extend his contract instead of the 1 year option? we would of saved millions... Everyone slammed me for it... Now we stuck and likely have to let him go and the SAME PEOPLE on these boards are going "on crap" This team made a huge mistake. just my opinion and I am sticking with it. Just because you can cheap out on a 5th year option, does not make it the "right" option.

yea, sadly there are others in this thread that disagree and because so, it makes it laughable

not only that, they would have to do EVERY GAME... its just stupid. thanks for getting it.

I have, and trust me... 500 people do not represent 60k. sample size is to small to be accurate. thats been my point and i stand behind that point.

to have a specific score yea.. its expensive. so lets say its 500 people. Does 500 people represent the other 60 k? you just made it look even worse.

do doubt For starters, Police could not be specific to cases. Secondly.. Ho many get dwi driving home from the stadium... Just for chits and giggles lets say that number is 100. does that 100 represent 60k? come on man... we are both reasonable people and there is no way they can back their numbers with facts

we don't do that?