Stank_Nasty
-
Posts
5,438 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Stank_Nasty
-
-
4 minutes ago, Foxx said:
i think it's a safe bet to say he will have more than 56 yards passing.
Thank God. Becuz we all know that was a weekly thing with Taylor.
-
4 hours ago, Dablitzkrieg said:
The line jumped 1.5 points in the last 24 hours to Bills -5.5 today.
I think you mean +5.5. We are most definitely not favored. My site actually has the line at 6
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, nedboy7 said:
I'd like my 1:38 back please.
Sorry. I probably should have started a thread that had to do with how bad Taylor was, what happens if Peterman sucks, why Taylor should be starting or why Peterman should be starting for a healthy debate..... I haven't seen any of those lately.
-
1
-
-
geez. some real buzz kills in here.
-
1
-
-
while I've been fairly vocal about not liking the switch. I cant help but absolutely looooovvvvveeee this! Always all in on whomever is starting for my bills baby!!!
-
2
-
1
-
2
-
-
Just now, jmc12290 said:
Taylor has played 38 games as a Bill, not just 7 this season.
I am of the opinion TT didn't move the needle either way in the first 7 games this year on the whole, he had bad and good moments. Which, in the NFL isn't good enough.
I do think its funny you think that because posters don't agree with your subjective player analysis, you think they want the Bills to lose. What if you thought Peterman was the best prospect in the 2017 class? Would everyone who didn't like the benching "want the Bills to lose?"
I don't have a very subjective view of taylor at all man.... that's what most of you don't get. you think anyone that doesn't agree with the benching or your view on taylor has a hard on for him. and theres some irony in that after what you just said. I don't think EVERYONE who likes the benching wanted to bills to lose so it would happen. in fact i'm willing to hear a solid argument about it.
as for my thoughts on taylor.....I wanted the bills to draft a qb high last year or in 18 even if taylor had a solid year. taylor can win games with support. he's been efficient and makes the occasional big play. when the defense was playing well we saw how valuable his type of efficient mistake free football can be. a recipe for success when the defense and run game shows up. when it doesn't we lose becuz he's just not good enough to carry that burden. the problem I see is when those other breakdowns happen all of sudden taylor sucks and has the whole time and "I told you so" and blah blah blah "I was right you were wrong" "he's been figured out" "he'll never win another game"....... meanwhile there are plenty of those people that weren't anywhere to be found 2 weeks ago.
-
1
-
-
my bud just text me a vid of the same dude that made "shady's night" earlier this year doing a remake of "it takes TWO to make a think go right" for Peterman...... somebody needs to find that and post it. i'm not good with that sort of thing. lol
-
13 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:
Let me ask you another question.
Which do you think is more likely? That posters on a Bills fan message board don't want the Bills to do well or that posters on a Bills fan message board think their QB was a detriment to the Bills doing well?
Because to me, the answer is clearly the latter.
do you think taylor was a detriment during the first 7 games as whole? if your answer is yes. then i'd say we're done here becuz there's nothing left to talk about. as we are clearly in 2 different galaxies on the topic.
I prefer to look at taylors season as a whole and not a 2 game sample size. now obviously he had been trending in the wrong direction. but all these people bloviating about how he should have been benched the whole time and wasn't any good all year(I could be mistaken but I feel I've seen such things from you) are just out of their gourds IMO.
also I find it funny that apparently the majority thinks a 5th round rookie is just gonna step in and out perform him.... like I said in numerous other posts. i'll freaking cheer my ass of for Peterman. i'm not tied to one player on this team but i'm not holding my breath on that notion, my man.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:
I think it was pretty accurate.
Do you honestly think posters on a Buffalo Bills fan message board don't want the Bills to win and do well? Serious question.
Before this week I thought I knew the answer to that but with how quiet certain people were during wins and now with all the I told you so’s with the benching I’m seriously and honestly beginning to wonder.
-
1 hour ago, Real McCoy said:
When will you realize that Tyrod is a mediocre QB (20-18) that will not lead the Bills anywhere? 80%+ of fans get it and our coaching staff (Thanks god) as well.
Even blind people with braille newspapers that read several times after getting destroyed "We just made him play QB" understand our former QB as a starter sucked.
It's really that Black and White but some can't or won't accept change, even when the right decision was finally made.
I'd get it if we were trying to Bench say Alex Smith with a 49-24 record as a starter that took his team to the playoffs 3 out of 4 years (Will most likely be 4 out of 5) as a starter. There is zero comparison to Alex and Tyrod other than maybe their scrambling abilities.
becuz smith didn't primarily ride a defense and run game in san fran and then do basically the same thing until this year in KC?..... just like i said in a prior post. one has had the luxury of elite defense(and elite coaching that i didn't originally mention but cant be ignored) on the other side while the other hasn't. you literally removed all the context out of what i had said. very convenient. good talk bro. you are one of my favorites.
43 minutes ago, JM2009 said:Sad answer to a solid post. Maury would be proud.
this week has really brought out the best.
like i said before. i seriously think tyrods, and the teams, solid start had certain posters squirming becuz they wanted nothing more than to just be right and be rid of him.
-
Just now, ShadyBillsFan said:
Let look at the whole picture at another angle.
If the Bills were not getting 3 turnovers a game and scoring points occasionally from them.
How many wins would they have?
1 less? 2,3?
oh my. that could be argued for so many winning qb's through history. come on man....
i see taylor as alex smith of 4 years ago. one had an elite d and run game year in and year out and the other hasn't.
taylor has won more than he's lost and he's not had a good defense behind him for most of that duration. all of sudden he has a 50 yd game and people act like that's what he'll do the rest of his career. good lord man, some are claiming he wont win another game. COME ON.
-
Just now, ShadyBillsFan said:
What if the last 2 seasons?
In each TT would have 2 maybe 3 very good games, 2 maybe 3 very bad games and 8 to 10 meh games.
The total number of meh games is what sealed his fate imo.
and what exactly are 5th round rookies known for? more good than bad? PUH-LEASE..... i guess this whole argument hinges on if you think a rookie will come in and actually be any good. sorry not buying it.
with that said. my fanhood isn't tied to taylor nor has it been tied to any other player in my life so i wait in anticipation to see what happens tomorrow and will be all in for Peterman or whomever else is starting.... i just find comical that people are buying in so hard on a rook.
-
16 minutes ago, PeterGriffin said:
Look, if Tyrod was a good QB and just had a couple of bad games I don't necessarily think McD benches him. The fact of the matter is Tyrod never was good, they won inspite of him never because of him. Now throw in a couple bad games from an already bad QB along with comments from other teams on how to stop him and here we are, a bad QB playing bad got benched. Good QBs don't get benched, is what it is and Tyrods days are done, IMO.
if this is what you gleaned from taylor and the team in general over the first 7 games i'm honestly blown away. nothing to discuss.
11 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:You see this is exactly what I am talking about when I said people over exaggerate. Jets game, Tyrod is the only guy who really came to play and had what was one of his better games as a Bill even accomplishing what he was able to with how poorly the rest of the team played. OL was one of the worst performances I had seen, receivers dropping passes, and even McCoy had one the of the worst games I have seen him play as a Bill missing holes, dancing, indecisive, etc.
Yes, the Saints game was probably the worst game Tyrod personally has played in his career, but you lumped in the Jets game where he was actually the best Bills player that game and no where close to as bad as the rest of the team was.
And also, that was the 36th game of Tyrods career against the Saints, lets now act like there was no footage on him and now all of a sudden there is some secret sauce on how teams will now suddenly defend him. There is plenty of footage prior to that for teams to know how to defend Tyrod, and yet he still has a winning record in the NFL. So I am sorry, your statement he can never win another game is beyond absurd. Done in the league? Maybe you should just be done posting about it because you clearly either way too biased to stay grounded in reason or actually don't have a clue to what you are talking about.
so much YES here... that poster is just absurd.
17 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:And also, that was the 36th game of Tyrods career against the Saints, lets not act like there was no footage on him and now all of a sudden there is some secret sauce on how teams will now suddenly defend him. There is plenty of footage prior to that for teams to know how to defend Tyrod, and yet he still has a winning record in the NFL. So I am sorry, your statement he can never win another game is beyond absurd. Done in the league? Maybe you should just be done posting about it because you clearly either way too biased to stay grounded in reason or actually don't have a clue to what you are talking about.
the guy has won more than he's lost and had way more average to good games than he has had bad ones and now all of sudden after 2 losses and a 50 yd game that's apparently all he'll be able to muster the rest of his career.... i don't understand how people can spew garbage like that onto a keyboard and not see how stupid it is.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Scott7975 said:
I feel like the benching came at the right time. I was a big TT supporter, but he was just outright bad last week. This offense just doesn't suit him and for better or worse the coaches were unwilling to change that. Peterman seems to fit this offense a lot better due to his quick decision/gunslinging nature. He still may not help us win football games because they team has many more problems, but he still looks to be the better QB for this offense in limited action anyhow.
What you are saying above, I don't doubt. There are at least a few posters that would disappear all week long on wins and then flood the forums in a loss.
if there was a time for the benching it would be now. i agree..... but people talking about how they knew this all along and they are upset it took 2 bad games to get it done just look idiotic.... so when should he have gotten benched? maybe after he brought them from behind against the bucs? or maybe the blowout win against the raiders? i laugh when they say they are mad it took so long.
-
26 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:
We’re not hating 5-2. I was starting to believe in TT.
We are “hating” that it took 2 ugly games and 10 points in meaningful game time for them to make the switch.
Some are hating that a certain poster kept saying Tyrod is the starter over and over thinking he was rubbing it in people’s faces then he refused to admit he was backing the wrong horse.
You want undertones? Read what some of the TT faithful post.
They post
I am rooting for Nate but what if he really sucks
commentary.
again. i'm fully convinced after reading over the last week that there were people literally squirming during tyrod and the teams solid start that's sad to me.... say what you want about the last 2 games but the guy played solid ball the first 7 games. you're ticked it took 2 bad games? so you are saying you wanted him benched after a 5-2 start and generally good set of games to start his season? i also find that extremely alarming.
ftr. i'm not a tyrod "lover" or a member of the COT.... whatever that even stands for. i actually wanted a qb early in 18 regardless of if taylor played solid ball or not.
but the people basking in this benching are freaking pathetic and sad. all for the sake of being proven right..... and honestly. i still wouldn't even say they are right. taylor has had a ton more average/good games than he has had bad ones. and he wins more than he loses.
-
After reading through a bit of this thread and the board in general I honestly feel like certain posters were hating our 5-2 start and the generally solid play during the first 7 games...... which is extremely pathetic and sad.
Almost undertones of being happy about the recentt implosion of the TEAM just becut it got Taylor benched
-
21 minutes ago, horned dogs said:
No that was the system that he played in.
I don't disagree with you. but I find it funny that when the same argument is brought up for another certain qb on the roster it gets crucified routinely.
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said:
While I agree with everything you said, the Bills team the last 2 weeks is a coin flip to even win the Indy game or either Miami game. That is my point, and its 100% because of how utterly dominated we got in the trenches on both sides of the ball. If we continue to get embarrassed at the LOS on D and O, we will struggle to win even 2 more games. So thats why I said the trenches to me are a much bigger concern in regards to making the playoffs than Peterman's play.
totally agree. I think they run a risk of ruining the poor kid if that stuff doesn't get ironed out.
-
1 minute ago, Patrick_Duffy said:
Counter question...... what if he comes out and lights it up with 5 TD passes and over 300 yards passing? How many will crown him after that 1 game?
me. I will. 100%. no shame in my game.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, ShadyBillsFan said:
Exactly my question
a pasted image w/o context
2 game losing streak
doesn’t Terrible Taylor have a longer one under Wrex?
wait so let me get this straight. am I reading this right? the 2 game lose streak where the whole team melts down isn't a big enough deal to mock the coach but its enough to bench the qb that had the same solid start to the season that the coach had?
I just wanna make sure we're on the same page.
-
4 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:
Just glad McD doesn't have the same mentality towards this as you. I really don't need to justify it, coach has already given his explanation as to why and I 1000% agree and support his decision.
There is nothing Novel or "new" about your concept as it a proven failed concept many, many times trying to back into the playoffs with a mediocre QB.
so again I ask... would making the playoffs be a regression? how is it not trending in the right direction? and why does making the playoffs make our ammo in the draft any less valuable or our future any less bright?
I guess this all hinges on the topic of the thread. do you actually think the 5th round rookie pans out. I sure would love to think so as a fan of the team but history tells me not to hold my breath.
-
2 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:
...can you describe that?.....I do not believe it is something in Bills lore vocabulary....thanks..............
I was 14 the last time it happened so I cant really paint a great picture for anyone. I've just heard its a good thing to get there. lol
-
Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:
Good news is that EJ Gaines and Zay Jones will be back in the lineup.
bosa and ingram vs dawkins and mills.
-
1 minute ago, Real McCoy said:
Sorry to say but 16 years has proven you wrong and that it what should be comprehended with the win now mentality. Knowing who to properly use/spend your many drafts picks next year to build a team can change everything for the future of our team.
I'm just glad to see we having a coaching staff and FO that actually understands what needs to happen going forward to make the team better overall. Actually, while typing this I finally now "Trust the Process" seeing what we are trying to do. It's 180* different from all the failed regimes we have entertained post Wade.
correct me if i'm wrong but wouldn't sneaking into the playoff with new coach and huge roster turnover be trending in the right direction?... while still have plenty of draft picks to go get whomever they deem fit.
what a novel concept.
Nathan Peterman to Start this Week.
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
I'm just glad we won't have to deal with those weekly 50 yd games everyone keeps bringing up. We all know how awful he was all 9 games this year