Stank_Nasty
-
Posts
5,438 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Stank_Nasty
-
-
1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said:
People that are involved in high level business meetings don't call them high level business meetings.
You googled business terms last time you talked about these meetings to sound legit but it only made you sound robotic.
lololol.... I was about to post something like this.
like, wouldn't "I've been busier than usual at work" suffice? it would be a good enough reason and would keep him from sounding like a complete DOUCHE.
-
15 hours ago, ProcessAccepted said:
You've got to be careful when selecting the next franchise QB. Let's get a solid vet and not overreach in the draft.
I get this. but the browns didn't really do anything to reach, like trade or waste a super early pick, for johnny kegstand.
its not the greatest example of a team overreaching.
-
Just now, PromoTheRobot said:
QB fever. There's no known vaccine.
i'm so embarrassed to talk about some of the qb's that I've been mad about the bills passing on..... that list will go to the death bed with me.
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:
I hope everyone realises that you're lucky to get one or two QBs that can even be a decent starter, much less franchise quality, in a draft. Half the guys we are debating are destined to be duds.
100% true. but its fun to discuss.... the only thing that really irritates me is the people that act as thought they KNOW how any of these qb's will pan out. if history shows anything its that its basically a crap shoot.
-
1
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, TheTruthHurts said:
I love draft season. The most manly of men ogling other men. Nothing wrong about it.
as a fitness professional that works with a lot of young local athletes the combine is always a huge topic of discussion in my gym when it comes around and people would be astounded about how much discussion a nice powerful male buttocks can generate amongst a group of men. LOLOL.
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Mrbojanglezs said:
LOL. this old burger king commercial is where my mind goes immediately whenever people start talking about tiny hands. haha.
"but I've got these small hands"
-
3
-
-
2 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:
God, neither do I. Sorry about that.
It was late late late at night when I saw that. Was surprised but posted. Should've realized I wasn't tracking well enough to post at that point. So I was just wrong about those numbers.
But my overall point still stands. The defense was wretched for that three-game stretch, just hideous. I mean we had 39% of the points against us all year put up in those three games. Horrendous. But really quite good the rest of the year, I mean except for those awful three games we only had three other games out of 13 where we allowed more than 20 points, and two of those three games were the Pats. Now, you can't ignore those three games, they were part of the season, they happened. But the defense put things together again after that.
Whereas the offense was sub-mediocre pretty much the whole year. And the pass game was just consistently wretched.
right on. so we hopefully grab a vet bridge at a cheaper price than taylor that can offer up a similar type of mistake free ball while fitting the offense better to keep the team trending in the right direction and draft our franchise this offseason. that's where i'm at.
doesn't change my thoughts on certain posters and the nonsense they spew on the board or the fact that it takes a jerk to look for any opportunity to rip a player at any turn or situation even if the player isn't involved and try to be right by any warped means necessary.
-
18 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:
Probably the same thing as the people watching today's games and then finding a way to make it an excuse to come on here and exalt Taylor to the heavens while pretending they aren't. Thereby confirming they're sort of obsessed.
And by ... you get the idea.
We come at it from the opposite direction of course but there are plenty of people on here today saying he'd have been fine with a better supporting cast, and on and on. Do you have anything against those people? Dude, be honest with yourself. You're not reacting to the situation. You're reacting to them saying stuff you disagree with. Same as the people on the other side of the argument.
Only the people on the other side of the argument simply have a better point.
how many freaking people are actually emphatically arguing to keep taylor anymore? i sure don't see more than a handful. so i don't exactly know where you are coming up with that. maybe the same place you came up with the bills have the #4 defense in total yds allowed and 11th in ppg? i dunno. just wondering....i'm totally done with it man.... i'm not even gonna debate. I've been moved on from taylor as early as last offseason. although I completely 100% disagree they have a better point at all with their mindless hate rants. in fact I find that most people taking up for taylor don't even feel like doing it anymore but its hard not to when people around here say the most idiotic things about him.
bottom line....coming on here to rip on the bills qb after watching the games yesterday is a jerk move. its needless and only confirms my previous thoughts on numerous posters..... and these said posters drastically outnumber the posters delusional enough to still think we need to go forward with taylor.
-
I think its comical that almost 70% actually think a real "fix" is on.... that's just silly.
-
45 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:
I have an assignment for anyone that has some time and it will be interesting (and time consuming). Go back over the last however many years and figure this out. Off the top of my head there are 3 things to look for: total penalties on Pats vs. Opposition, yards in both scenarios and how many penalties were on 3rd or 4th down that resulted in a 1st? This needs to be done though ONLY on games that are within 14 points either way. Throw out everything else. That, imo, will tell more of the story than intuition.
i'm never gonna do that but I think its worth mentioning that I saw a stat near the end of the season that the pats had more scoring drives extended by a 3rd down penalty than anyone in the nfl this year and it was by a wide margin.
that's annoying.
-
1
-
-
Just now, billsfan11 said:
The PI at the end of the first half was questionable, plus the huge difference in penalties/yardage.
There most definitely was a huge difference in the yardage. But I think the pats honestly just played a cleaner game than the jags.
I personally had no issue with the PI to end the half.
There have definitely been games where the fix(which I don’t believe is a “thing”) seemed to be on. I just don’t think this was one of them.
-
1
-
-
I didn’t see much of anything to get upset with in the game. The one play that had the potential to be controversial(the fumble) was upheld like it should have been.
They played good disciplined football to end that game.
-
2
-
-
6 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:
Taylor is a pitiful excuse for a QB.
What exactly is the point people watching today’s games and then finding a way to make it an excuse to come on here and bash Taylor other than confirming that they are sort of a petty jerks.
And by “sort of” I mean 100% totally are.
-
21 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:
Again, it wasn't Tyrod who won or lost. Win-loss is a team stat. It just is. Nor did Tyrod "ultimately made the postseason." Again, that would be the Buffalo Bills.
And while the defense was really inconsistent and not great, they were far better than the offense. They had that one absolutely awful three-game stretch in the middle of the season against the Jets, Saints and Chargers. But for the rest of the year they were pretty good. Turnovers were a part of that but far from all of it. The defense was pretty solid. The offense was OK and most of that was the run game.
The defense was 4th in yards (HELLO!!!) this year and 11th in points.
The offense was 29th in yards and 22nd in scoring. And the run game gets the lion's share of that.
Tyrod deserves a ton of flack. Again, I get it that you understand we are moving on and for good reason. But you're still giving Tyrod more credit than he deserves.
I have absolutely no idea where you got those defensive numbers from. those rankings you just mentioned are wildly inaccurate. he defense was 26th(NOT 4TH) in total yds allowed and 18th in points against.
-
18 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:
This is the problem with arguing for Tyrod, Stank. You can't really claim he played well, so you have to use sarcasm like "Taylor played awful during the 5-2 start," and hope nobody notices you haven't said much.
During the first seven games Tyrod had a 63.8 completion percentage, a 6.8 YPC and a passer rating of 91.43. And threw for 206 yards per game and had a TD:INT ratio of 7:2. If that looks familiar it's because that's pretty much what he did all year with around 20 extra yards per game because he threw it a bit more.
And it ain't exactly like the passing defenses we were up against was a Murderer's Row type of group. We played the Jets, Carolina, Denver, Atlanta, Cincy, Tampa Bay and Oakland during those first seven games you mentioned. They managed to rank this way, respectively, in defensive passer rating: 19th, 24th, 20th, 21st, 13th, 27th and 30th The best was 13th. Every other one was 19th or worse. Five out of seven in the twenties or thirties.
That was a pretty weak group and Tyrod performed just about as well as he did the rest of the year ... below average but not all that far below. Not throwing INTs, but also not producing much.
I get that you're willing to move on, but you're still trying to say more for Tyrod than can be reasonably backed up. The guy's going to be a career backup or desperation starter for a year or two around the league before his teams replace him.
I don’t think the team as a whole was very good this year offense or defense. The only thing that kept them afloat was taking the ball away and not giving it away. And I think Tyrod was directly involved in that and that’s basically the only thing I give him a lot of credit for.
I just can’t believe the amount of flack around here for a guy than won more than he lost over 3 years and ultimately made the postseason while not having consistent weapons or defense. It’s mind blowing to me..... and now somebody like xrush or that awful teddy character are gonna translate that into me saying I think he’s the franchise for the next 5 years.
-
Just now, Foxx said:
first your criteria was winning more games than losing. now you want to add criteria and move the goal posts. this is a circle jerk?
Is comparing a half a season to 3 years reasonable or not? Don’t be difficult just for the sake of it. You know the answer.
-
2 minutes ago, xRUSHx said:
It is simple to see for most that they did not win because of Tyrod, they won in spite of him. Yes it is that simple.
Right. Becuz the defense was so consisten this year and Taylor played awful during the 5-2 start.
you are a different sort of creature man. Impressive.
I dont even like taking up for Taylor anymore becuz I’m just sooo over him but you are just so awful.
-
1 hour ago, ShadyBillsFan said:
Winning records.
Yeah or Nay?
Mark Sanchez: 37-35 (.514)
Nick Foles: 20-16 (.556)
Much better examples than your weak broncos one. I’ll Give you that.
1 hour ago, xRUSHx said:Dumb is standing up to defend not good enough with the same type of stale excuses during the last staff Tyrod. Keep sipping on a straw of stale while pretending your drinking something that is good enough when we all know it is not. It has a nasty smell it is time to throw it out.
Dude. Just becuz I debate your idiotic diatribe on Taylor doesn’t mean I want him back. How many times do I need to say this before you get it? Are you that simple?
You don’t say smart things. You blabbed on and on about how they had no chance with Taylor if he started after the colts game and then they went to the playoffs. You just say dramatic dumb things. They get debated by people that have some sense and then you label them “COT”... which is soooo douchey by the way. Do people not see how lame that saying is?
I can can not be satisfied with the qb and want more while still debating how ridiculous your takes are. Try and wrap your head around that.
1 hour ago, xRUSHx said:Backup talent that will not be getting 18 Mill in 2018. Both are much better then Tyrod IMO.
Lolololol. I think I was just talking about the dumb things you say about Taylor and then you totally prove me right by saying Sanchez is a better qb.
This is CLASSIC xrush right here! PERFECT!!! Hahahaha.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, ShadyBillsFan said:
Osweiller has won more than he lost. Then he was “let go”.
He wasn’t good enough.
The defense helped him. It was not the other way around.
Again. Comparing a qb that did well for a half a season with a generational defense to one that has played 3 years with an inconsistent defense is honestly just sorta dumb. Seriously. You gotta be better than that.
I get it. You gotta be right. It’s your thing. You grasp at straws to make sure that happens. But come on man. It’s a dumb comparison.
-
17 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:
Did you read his post?
TT is not a guy who can be a serious contender.
Do we need to list QB’s with a winning record that never amounted to anything?
Osweilller in Denver before he got benched by Manning (a fraction of himself) had more wins than losses.
I could even go as low and say Tim Tebow has more wins than losses.
You need to know when to cut bait.
Right. Let’s use the Broncos title team as an example. Literally one of the best defenses of the last 10-15 years. Not to mention putting 2 qb’s that played half a season of work against 3 full years is really flawed and just silly. I wouldn’t expect anything different though becuz you always twist things in the name of being right..... what a bad comparison. Seriously.
You can nit pick up exceptions all you want but as a general rule qb’s that win more than they lose over a span(NOT A HALF SEASON WITH AN ALL WORLD DEFENSE) aren’t bad qb’s.
And i I have no problems cutting bait. Let’s just talk with some sense about the guy. And please stop using bad comparisons to prove points.
-
11 minutes ago, Green Lightning said:
Yeah you're right, just like Peyton Manning, Brady, Dan Marino, Johnny Unitas, and John Elway. Those are the top five come-from-behind quarterbacks. If only they were more competent in the first 3 quarters they wouldn't have had to rally in the 4th Yeah you're right!
You definitely are lost. I'm saying this, Teddy Bridgewater is a better quarterback than Tyrod Taylor. Our offense would be much better under him in the sense of winning games. We would be playing the Patriots today if Bridgewater were our quarterback against Jacksonville. I'm not saying Teddy is our end-all quarterback, he's better than Tyrod and whoever we draft Teddy could help school them. That's how this whole thing began my friend. You want to get stuck on passing yards and stats, fine I'm talking about winning football games. Particularly when the game is on the line and it matters - when TT dissappears. When the going gets tough, Tyrod tanks.
I’m Fine with moving on from Tyrod but you seriously need to pump the breaks on teddy. Good lord. The guy has been extremely pedestrian.
Im even ok with bringing him in if he’s reasonably priced but the guy wasn’t anything more than average before the injury. And if he was better than Taylor before the injury it was marginal at best. The year he went 11-5 he had the 5th ranked defense in points against and the 4th ranked rush attack backing him up. He tossed 14 td’s for cripes sake.
-
18 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:
All the Taylor groupies can meltdown this week.
Let it all out before the draft. No one who watches him play wants to hear the nonsense/excuses anymore.
Farewell “stank nasty”
Bro, I wanted a qb at #10 last year and was as fairly annoyed when it didn’t happen. I’ve been ready to move on for a long time. That doesn’t change the fact you talk like a fool.
You’re the worst type of poster. You live in extremes. It’s just the worst. I hope it’s an act. Otherwise I just feel sorry for you.
4 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:Because it is the truth.
How well did he play when the playoff game progressed?
Poorly. Taylor did not win himself. The defense did by keeping teams to under 16 points and even then 2 of those games it wasn’t good enough because the offense failed to score.
Pleas let let it go.
The guy has won more than he’s lost over 3 years and now been to the playoffs. Therefore anyone saying you can’t win with Tyrod just looks dumb.
guess it depends on what “win” you are talking about. A title? No. I don’t believe that’s attainable with him obviously. Never have. But you’ll be able to win games with him. That’s been proven even without the presence of a consistent defense over the last 3 years. I get people like you apparently don’t see or hear things like that even though they are 100% true. But it’s there and it happened.
-
12 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:
You’re right, he’s really really good.
We don’t need a QB anymore, just a defense that can hold playoff teams to 2 points.
Taylor and Daboll = Dream Team
Yes. Becuz this is what anyone debating your idiocy is basically saying.... I’m glad we’re on the same page.
-
24 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:
What does all this mean ? More bbmb call outs ?
#youmad #taylorsucks #tranniemeltdown
#tastywavesbrah #taylortoarizona
#yardsandfranchiseqbsarebadnow??♂️??♂️☠️??♂️
I think we should talk more about his pass yd rankings and how that’s the only thing that matters and how it trumps everyone else’s solid arguments talking about a myriad of other factors in the evaluation of Taylor.
I think it’s a great strategy, really in depth, and won’t make you look really narrow minded and stupid or idiotic at all.... so let’s keep that up. It really makes a lot of sense.
What were his yardage rankings again? Could you tell me? That’s really all I care about in this argument.
(No condescending sarcasm here at all. I promise)
Source: Bills all in on Peterman unless they can land Sam Darnold
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
lolololololoollolo.....
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL....
so the jags going to the title game somehow makes petermans awful string of plays in the jags game "more impressive"???