SCBills

That’s not what people mean (for the most part) when they say “leave our kids alone”.., in relation to TQ+ activists. That being said, yes, we should absolutely focus more on schools, churches and cartel activity to protect children.

This is the correct answer.

I think people like you are erasing LGB folks in the name of TQ+. I think you’re irreparably harming a community of people that just wanted to live their lives in equality by pushing an agenda that is now setting them back in the eyes of society. They had it. They were accepted. They had equality. And now you’re actively destroying all they worked for because you want to support the people in the tweet you referenced. If you want to know who’s hurting that community .. look in the mirror.

Why is LGBTQ acceptance dropping amongst every demographic?

Tucker’s next Twitter episode is going to be appointment viewing after these past 24 hours..

He was on the Twitter space last night, but that was before we got the ol’ okie doke from Wagner. They did have a former government official in Ukraine .. and he said those he talked to put it at about 20% false flag, which is why they were ultra-cautious about advancing during all the chaos.

Interesting development..

Lol..

Yes .. I’m sure the poster who shared that decided to highlight a post from a random parody account because of the content of the tweet…. Do you normally take posts from parody accounts seriously?

The bigger idiot is quoting “Elon Musk Parody” thinking that’s Elon Musk.

Prigozhin turning back makes zero sense. What could he possibly be promised that he’d head back to the field? Reminds me of the phrase “come at the king, you best not miss”… *Twitter Space guys are hearing that Wagner has been given security clearances from the Kremlin and MoD he has issues with will be dealt with .. Prigozhin will have more say in the execution of the war.

You’re honestly one of the most annoying, uninformed and easily manipulated posters I’ve seen on any forum, ever.

Seems a lot of people celebrating this are viewing it in a Ukraine-centric fashion.. Likely the best case scenario for Ukraine is for Putin to remain in power, beat back Prizoghin, but become further weakened by having to pull frontline troops out of Ukraine and now look 100% vulnerable. Prizoghin taking control is a complete Wild Card in relation to Ukraine. He speaks out of both sides of his mouth and seems to only care about money and power. He seems open to ceasing war by recent comments aimed at Putin, but has long held the view that Ukraine should be destroyed and Putin has been too weak in his military advances. Beyond Ukraine .. what does this mean for global stability? Ukraine is only a bit piece of this. Regime change has rarely worked out as intended. We’ve seen the rise of ISIS and mass humanitarian crises that now continue to threaten Europe to this day. This time nuclear weapons are involved. The war in Ukraine may, or may not, be positively affected by this. Every other outcome is a complete wild card and could get far, far worse.

New flag for the Twitter handles

Define “win” Did we win when we took out Gaddafi? Did we win when we took out Saddam?

It’s honestly bizarre that neolibs and neocons are simping for … checks notes … Prizoghin and ultra-right wing backed Wagner Group. Most of the “pro-Putin” rhetoric was simply opposition to the funding of forever proxy wars and the use of Ukraine as collateral damage. We have no idea how this turns out, and you’re putting a lot of faith in Putin not becoming a wounded animal with nukes and/or Prizoghin .. a maniacal mercenary .. now becoming the de facto leader of Russia and acting in a diplomatic fashion. Perhaps we can strike a deal with Prizoghin, as he seems to talk out of both sides of his mouth, but this situation (with nuclear weapons involved) is hardly something to be taking victory laps over. How many times have we orchestrated regime change only for it to completely backfire?

It’s wild how much better the coverage of this situation is on Twitter than on any of the media networks.. I know there’s an aversion by some here to listen in when they see some of the participants typically in a Mario Nawfal space, but he will bring in people from all sides. He’s been going for about 16 hours now and currently Lev Parnas and Malcolm Nance are two of the speakers in the mix … they are certainly not members of the right wing populist crowd. Other speakers are some people in Moscow, foreign policy analysts and former military/intel.

Sounds like this is moving very quickly and very effectively from all accounts. Prighozin wanted a realignment militarily. The question now seems to be is this a coup going after Putin or a power play to get what he wants. And if he gets what he wants .. is he in control anyway?

Important.

Instability and a wild card leader (who’s more bloodthirsty than Putin), with access to nuclear weapons. Sounds great.

Tell us why you prefer Prighozin to Putin. .. because I’m assuming you know nothing about him. Do you and William know that he’s more hawkish on demolishing Ukraine than Putin?

Do we want a coup in Russia? Honest question. I mean, I know our leaders do .. that’s obvious. We’ve certainly had our fair share of regime change … when has it turned out for the better? Prighozin has already stated that he wants Ukraine - He’s reportedly more hawkish in regards to this war than Putin .. so it’s not like he’s going to take out Putin and then leave Ukraine alone. We would then have a wild card government in charge of Russia with access to nukes.

It’s moderated by Mario Nawfal, who does a great job with these spaces. There are folks from both sides of the debate in there and they’re mostly focusing on news reports / speculation coming in.

Good Twitter space on this right now. https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1vAGRAwNvzXKl