1ManRaid

I don't get why people are so down on this pick. I'm stoked for our 2 TE sets this year. I'm also told he's good after the catch for YAC which is the overrated stat of choice for many.

Seeing as we already have our guy locked up, I really hope they give a declining Lamar ALL the guaranteed money.

Should make a Google Doc for the rest of us to copy.

Damm, now I gotta find where to watch that. I could feel the old dude's sadness when his wife was like "You still have two, maybe three good years of football left" trying to keep him from retiring.

WHAT

I don't really follow this kind of stuff, but is that still really the case? I could have sworn I've heard about DV players getting outright cut and whatnot.

I'm thinking Costco and their Kirkland brand. Great quality and quantity at a reasonable price.

It's OTAs, he'll be fine.

Because it's not solely based on percentage. He said it's a compilation.

Yeah, that's a large part of the discovery process. A lot of these cases aren't even really about the money, and more about forcing thr issue to find out what exactly happened. There's logical reasons to not volunteer a blood sample, which typically requires a warrant to take. One is simple protection of personal freedoms, even if innocent. Another could be policy from the trucking company to not voluntarily interact with police or other third parties without the insurance company's lawyers' presence or instructions. These companies tend to carry a LOT of liability, so their insurance companies tend to have a lot of say in their operations.

I've watched a lot of Attorney Tom, a catastrophic injury lawyer on YouTube. Basically rule #1 of understanding catastrophic injury cases is that EVERYONE even loosely related to the case gets sued. It's not personal, or even greed in the majority of cases, that's just how they're forced to operate to do right by their clients in the current system. The lawyer can literally be sued by their client afterwards if it comes to light that there were involved parties that didn't get included in the initial lawsuit.

If I recall correctly, he said WR1 was his ceiling, which it still is. His sideline swag and deep threat ability are still largely untapped.

Would like, but how in our cap?

(tip of the hat for a job well done) Damn right, Spam (when properly cooked) is a god damned delicacy.

Of course, but the truck company isn't suing the Haskins estate lol. If they were, they'd be throwing a similarly wide net. Not disagreeing with you there. But if you'll permit me being a snarky bish for a moment, it's redundant to add "he found out" to FAFO. 😝

I agree, but that's just how the system works. "Don't hate the playa, hate the game" and all that. But in the example you mentioned of the brakes missing a week's service, that is far from "likely 0 to do with" the hypothetical. Industrial trucks are strictly regulated for a reason, and missed regular checkups DO get people killed.

I do hear it snows in California sometimes, so it's indeed basically the same as Buffalo.

Just heard a guy on the radio (who played QB in college and had a close relative who was a 10 year NFL QB) tell a story the other day about how his NFL brother/cousin/whateveridontremember chastising him for being too focused on strength training, and had him cut out like 80% of the weight lifting in favor of yoga and other flexibility stuff. Came from a fun talk about some meme QB in this draft who got absolutely jacked and ripped as hell for the combine rather than work on things that would actually make him a better QB.

I like to hate on Tua and the Phish as much as the next guy, but a few extra pounds in April in the depths of the offseason is a big ole nothing burger.

I'm looking forward to seeing the golden child of his rookie class (Sauce) start racking up illegal contact penalties this year now the league has gotten their year of novelty out of him. It's going to be glorious when the diva in New York City's media goes apecrap publicly over all the penalties.

That's literally just how catastrophic injury cases work. It's not malice or a targeted grift/harassment, no lawyer worth their weight wouldn't include EVERYONE even tangentially related to the incident in the lawsuit. To not do so would be failing to act in the best interests of their client. You never know what discovery might turn up. (Hypothetical extreme examples of course) Sold him a pack of gum earlier in the day? You're getting sued. Why? Well discovery might expose that the newsstand you work at was being investigated after customers kept winding up in the hospital after lax health and safety measures led to rats peeing on the gum giving people a rare obscure condition that yadda yadda yadda... You're a new junior assistant air filter technician at the truck company? You're getting sued. Discovery might expose that your recent hiring was because of someone else retiring, and incompetent management misfiled some paperwork leading to the retired hydraulics/brakes technician accidentally being replaced with an untrained air filter jockey, leading to the truck having it's regularly scheduled brake service delayed another week... When you get one throw of a net to catch some fish, you throw as large a net as possible.

Gotta steal these stats now, thanks.

Good I guess heh. I was just working off what I've been told, don't really know the player.

Yeah, our safeties are getting older and have shown to not be immune to injury, and our new depth was a starter for a Super Bowl team before a down year on a collapsing cap-crunch team? Sign me up.

If only we had a coach known for taking DBs who "failed" with other teams, and getting production out of them...