Shaw66

I agree with you. A GM ordinarily has that power, but few GMs do it without consulting with the owners. I think, as I think you do, that the Pegulas are too committed to McD to let Beane fire him any time soon. I agree. It captures the reality of the current situation.

I'm not saying I like it; I'm just saying that Beane has been very clear that that's what he's doing. And, as I said, it's been the Packers philosophy for years, and it worked for them. If I were Beane, I'd look at this way: I know what kind of players we are looking for, and I've studied the draft really carefully for the past five years. That means there are guys who are the kind of guys we are looking for coming off their rookie contracts. Some of them are going to be free agents. I need some quality veteran help, so why wouldn't I go after some of those guys? But that isn't what he's said. He's said people shouldn't expect to see the Bills on a spending spree in free agency. He's said they probably will look to plug a hole or two in free agency, but other then that, they want to draft their players.

Replying to you and Figster, I agree with you and disagree with him on this point. It seems to me that the Bills are playing an unimaginative offense, among the least imaginative in the league. Now, they're doing that probably because they either want to dumb it down for their inexperienced QBs or they don't think they have enough talent to open up the offense. Either way, I think that's a mistake, because by playing unimaginative offense you more or less guarantee that the opponent is going to stop you, week after week, so all you're doing is reducing the likelihood that you'll win a game. And winning, after all, is the object. But beyond that, if you're playing an unimaginative offense, you aren't giving your young QBs (and your other young players) a true NFL experience. You're asking them to practice playing a game that is different from the game that you presumptively will be asking them to play next year. By doing that, your players are losing an opportunity to play the way you'll want and need them to play. Give your wideouts an opportunity to run screens and rubs and double moves, because that's what receivers on good teams do. Give your QBs the opportunity to learn how to throw those passes, which require a quick release, accuracy and timing. Run some serious misdirection plays. Run those tricky double screens where it looks like you're screening to one side but you're actually going the other way. Do all that stuff and more. The offense that Bills are playing has virtually no chance of succeeding, unless the defense holds the opponent to single digits. Play an offense that may blow up in your face, but it at least has a chance to score 20 a game or more. And in the meantime you'll be giving your young players an opportunity to learn. This is a man's game, and asking your players to take baby steps ain't gonna cut it.

Yeah, I remember the play but not the look. Again, I don't know what his assignment is on running plays, but it seems that a lot of times when I watched him he gets caught in the wash. I'd think that with his speed, given how much misdirection everyone runs, the Bills would benefit by having lay back a bit and not commit so quickly to his gap. That way he would keep his ability to track plays laterally, which is where his strength is. The problem with that, I suppose, is that if he lays back and the running back hits his gap, the back is going to get 2-3 yards, and occasionally more, than if Edmunds had attacked the gap. The answer probably is that Edmunds has to learn to read the play quickly and to commit to the gap or not, depending on his read. McBeane have been absolutely clear they are not building in free agency. Beane said that the fans shouldn't expect a big spending spree in 2019. He said they may get a guy or two to plug gaps, but their focus is going to remain on the draft. That's what makes we agree with the speculation that the Bills might unload Shady and Benjamin for picks. Essentially what they've said, in so many words, is that they're building like the Packers have done it for years. A couple of years ago the Packers had a roster where NO player had ever been on the 53-man roster of any other team. They were essentially all drafted or undrafted rookies, with a few guys plucked from other practice squads. It sounds like that's what they want to do. And that's why I don't think anyone's getting fired anytime soon. They've explained all of this to the Pegulas, and everything we've heard and seen suggests the Pegulas are on board. Bottom line: the 2019 roster will be the first where McBeane will have THEIR young guys on the team, so you shouldn't expect a Rams-type turn-around.

Their stats are surprisingly good. They're fourth in yards per game, even though the offense has serious trouble staying on the field. More amazing is that they're 16th in points per game, even though they've had games where the opponents seemed to be scoring in the NBA-range.

I share your feelings on a lot of this, except I don't expect him to get fired anytime this season. I expect he'll be the coach on opening day, 2019, and he'll get all of 2019 unless the Bills look as bad next season as they have several games this season. Why? A couple of reasons. First, I think Beane feels gratitude and loyalty to McDermott for having gotten him the GM job. Second, I think McBeane really do believe that they have a system that, in time, will work. Third, I don't think the Pegulas want a coaching merry-go-round. They bought McB's kool-aid, and they're going to savor every last drop before they head off in another direction. I've always thought McB have three full years, minimum, and I still think that.

There's only one thing that feels better than standing and screaming with 70,000 Bills fans in New Era.

Funny, I was looking at threads about flat vs. curved. There's no reason not bend a flat brim. I find, however, that hat with pre-curved brims fit my head better. That's not going to stop me from picking up a #34. Looks cool, and I need a new cap.

You can't curve flat brims? Why not? All caps used to come with a flat brim - the first thing you did when you got a new cap as a kid was style the brim with the right amount of curve for the image you wanted. I was thinking about getting one, but not if I have to wear it flat.

You've had bad luck. I live in Connecticut and have a friend who lives in Cleveland but is a Giants fan. He won't join me in Buffalo for games, but several years ago he told me he'd go to one away game a year with me. So every year we pick one game, fly in on Saturday and fly out Sunday night (except lately my wife has been going with me, and she and I tack on a few days somewhere fun). Green Bay, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, the Giants, Tennessee, Chicago, Miami, Atlanta, Houston. Crushed by the Packers who won the Super Bowl that year - it was Trent's last start - he was cut two days later. Beaten badly by the Steelers, with EJ struggling to get one meaningless TD as the clock ran out, win in Cleveland, lost to the Giants with Freddy making a great long TD and Fitz underthrowing Stevie TWICE, each would have been a TD and each was intercepted. Tyrod makes some great plays to beat the Titans. Freddy's great run in overtime to beat the Bears. Ajayai runs for 200 against the Bills. Great win against the Falcons. Peterman throws two picks to lose to the Texans. 4-5. Not bad, and it sort of mirrors the Bills over-all record during that period. I don't know. There have been times when driving home after another hopeless performance by the Bills in November I've decided I'm done, no more season tickets, no more driving to games. But then I stick it out for one more season, and I get rewarded by some good games. Sometimes I think a fitting end to my life would be a horrific one-car crash at 11 pm some Sunday night. If my life story is a tragedy, it would be after a loss. If it's a happy story, it would be after the Bills have crushed the Pats, I'm doing 70 on the Mass Pike, pull up next to a car with Pats decals on it, I'm singing the Shout song out the window to the losers next to me and -WHAM! - right into a bridge abutment, so my dying thoughts are all about the Bills, the win and joy in Bills-land. In other words, I'm nuts, and all my friends know it.

I can't agree. I love being in the crowd. Just like I loved being at Christians Tailgate. All those Bills fans in one place. It's a tribe, and I love being a part of the tribe. I love the feeling. And every once in a while they win, and that's great.

I agree. And Phillips, probably Milano, Dawkins and probably Miller. And they're a little older, but Poyer and Hyde play really well together back there and should be good for 3-4 more years. It's not like there's no talent on the team. Not enough, but they have guys to build on. As I said, it's the coaching that worries me.

One thing about Edmunds I forgot to note in the OP. One of his problems - maybe it's what he's supposed to do, is that on runs he attacks his gap and gets right up in behind the defensive line. When the running back changes direction, or when the play is a well-executed misdirection play, Edmunds can't move laterally, because he gets stuck in the mass of bodies, between his teammates and blockers who have gotten to the second level. The result is that he can't pursue effectively. Seems to me he needs to hang back a bit longer before he moves to plug the hole. It means he gets to his gap a second later, but it also means he's in space where he can move laterally to make plays to his left or right. I'll get bashed for saying this, but I didn't see Mahomes doing anything last night that Allen hasn't done or can't do. Mahomes is blessed with a spectacular collection of talent and a brilliant head coach. Allen has neither.

Yeah, but the guy who is standing "next to nothing" is Larry Fitzgerald.

Yes, that is exactly the question. It's kind of surprising, because he seemed to be a really solid and creative DC in Carolina. What's particularly surprising to me is that he seems to have completely struck out on two successive OCs. You'd think a good DC ought to be able to figure out who's a good OC.

I go hoping for miracles. You know, like a Monday night win over the Patriots.

I read somewhere that Bill Belichick's single greatest skill is film study. He's a master at reviewing film, figuring out what a team is doing and figuring out his team has to do to counter it. I think if you're Jekyl and Hyde like the Bills - competitive some days and not others, it says you're bad at film study. By the seventh game of the season, teams have begun to show their tendencies. The films will show which plays they run regularly and why those plays work for them. By this time in the season, your team should be identifying those tendencies and adjusting offensive and defensive schemes to neutralize what the opponent does well and to take advantage of what the opponent does poorly. Getting blown out by a mediocre team like the Bills did Sunday means, I think, that either the coaches (1) aren't learning what they should from film study or (2) aren't designing effective counter measures to attack the opponent or (3) aren't effectively teaching the players those counter measures. So maybe the Bills were surprised by what the Ravens did, and maybe even what the Chargers did, but I doubt it. In any case, they shouldn't have been surprised by what the Colts did. And they shouldn't have been surprised in mid-season last year, when they were blown out three games in a row. One reason the Patriots don't do so well in September is that Belichick doesn't have enough film on the teams to understand and attack their strengths. And film study is why the Patriots, more so than most teams, look different from week to week. If the film says a defense is weak against the run, the Patriots become a running team for the week. If the study says passing is the way to go, that's what the Patriots do. You can have all the character you want; if your aren't teaching your players what they need to do, you aren't going to win.

I think Allen is going to be great. There's not much to watch until he gets back.

The Rockpile Review – by Shaw66 “So Funny I Could Cry” There was a time when The Rockpile Review was funny, or that’s what people told me. I’ve been trying to remember those times. The Rockpile Review began in 2005, under a different title. In those days, it seemed I always could find the humor somewhere in the games. J.P. Losman was pretty funny, I suppose. T.O. was amusing. Marshawn was always entertaining. Eventually, however, the lovable loser thing got old. A few years earlier, Dareus would have been funny, but by his time he was just a symptom. It’s particularly hard to find the humor when the Bills are as bad as they were against the Colts on Sunday. For the third time this season and the seventh time in two years, the Bills found themselves in a game in which they couldn’t compete. They were outplayed from the beginning. They were ineffective from the beginning. It was so bad, it should have been funny, but it was worse than that. Well, watching Tremaine Edmunds tackle is kind of funny. If he manages to actually get his arms around the guy, he slides off like a Looney Tunes character. Failing to score in the final two minutes of the first half while giving up 10 points was amazing, but I wasn’t laughing. That’s about it for humor this week. At least humor about the Bills. Have you seen Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle? Saw it the other night, and it’s surprisingly funny. It’s a clever premise, putting real people into a video game, and the writers took full advantage. It goes a bit overboard on the Indiana-Jones-like action sequences, but that’s okay. It’s worth a watch. Sorry, but it’s kind of painful thinking about that game. Particularly painful is that I believe coaching is more important than talent, and if I’m correct about that, the Bills’ coaches are terrible. Sean McDermott says he hates pre-snap penalties. Well, Sean, you had plenty to hate on Sunday, on both sides of the ball. When’s your team going to clean them up? I get being conservative and all, but at the end of the third quarter, down 21, you run twice and then throw incomplete on third and 12? With McCoy out of the game, Ivory gets injured, and you give the ball to Marcus Murphy four consecutive plays? Guess what, Sean? Kelvin Benjamin has come back from the dead. He can run routes, and he’s catching the ball WITH HIS HANDS! Zay Jones looks like a real receiver, too. Can we PLEASE run some pass patterns to get these guys open? Every team in the league gets guys open on third and 3, third and 5. Just watch some film and copy what the Colts did to you. Oh, and while you’re watching the film, try to figure out why it’s necessary for your entire zone defense to drop so deep that the opponents’ safety valve receiver can catch the ball over the middle with no defender within 15 yards. Once you figure that out, maybe you can work THAT into the offense, too. Want to see a good movie? Bad Times at El Royale. I know, the previews make it look like another six-people-stranded-in-a-motel-on-a-rainy-night movie. Well, yes, it is. But it’s good. Interesting characters. Weird twists. It’s funny and entertaining. The Bills, unfortunately, are not entertaining. Some days they’re good on defense, other days not so much. They’re essentially never good on offense – they’re not on the same planet with the Chiefs.. The special teams are iffy. Things I liked: Kyle Williams. He just always plays. Jerry Hughes, penalties or not, he’s learned to play like Kyle. Tre White – man, he sticks to his man. That pass interference call was bogus; the receiver initiated the contact and then had to back off to try to catch the ball. Tremaine Edmunds, despite his tackling. Kelvin Benjamin, finally doing the things we thought he’d do when he came to Buffalo. And I like Josh Allen. Despite what I might like, this team is in trouble. And I’m not laughing. My wife said “maybe they’ll do better next week.” I told her next week is the Patriots. We both got a good laugh out of that. GO BILLS!!! The Rockpile Review is written to share the passion we have for the Buffalo Bills. That passion was born in the Rockpile; its parents were everyday people of western New York who translated their dedication to a full day’s hard work and simple pleasures into love for a pro football team.

RIP, Dick. Good, good player. I love the story about his little brother, Ed. They were big Mo and little Mo. Ed started at fullback for the Browns for two or three years in the 50s, and he was really well liked by his teammates. When a rookie running back showed up in training camp in 1957, Ed's pals on the defense made sure they gave the rookie a few extra, hard shots, because they didn't want some rookie taking Ed's job. After a a couple of days, Ed's pals recognized that it really didn't matter how hard they hit Jim Brown, he wasn't going down. After that, they all were resigned to the fact that Brown would be the starter. Ed died a couple of years ago.

Yeah, that defense was truly great. If I'm recalling correctly, McDole was the guy the Bills had difficulty keeping at his playing weight. He wouldn't stay on any diet. There was a story (again, I THINK it was about McDole) that at training camp they limited his calories and even then he gained weight. Finally, the Bills actually put him under surveillance, and someone caught him sneaking out of camp at night and eating a half dozen burgers at McDonalds!

Here's what would have changed: Derek Anderson would have been the second string quarterback, he would have come into the Texans game when Allen got hurt, and he wouldn't have thrown the interceptions. The Bills likely would have won the game. People were complaining here for weeks that the Bills didn't have a mento for Allen and didn't have a backup. I thought it was just whining, but they were right. Peterman probably shouldn't be on the team at all, but in any case he shouldn't have been the backup. That's bad decision making by McBeane.

And that's the biggest reason I'm disappointed about his injury. He needs time on the field. He has a lot to learn.

Thanks. That's interesting. I know the feeling from playing basketball. You're in the process of shooting and you see something distracts you, and somehow your brain's shooting sequence gets disrupted. I think he has a ton to learn about the game, but that doesn't bother me today. He will learn it or he won't, and we will find that out in the future. Is He Peyton or is he Cutler or somewhere in between? My point is that I don't yet see much that might prevent him from being a success. He looks like he's on his way.

I appreciate that you played D 1. That means that you understand a lot of things about playing QB that I don't. Frankly, I'm not worrying too much about presnap reads. That's a skill that NFL qbs say isn't learned learned in college, at least not anything like whats necessary in the pros. That's a big part of the jump you're talking about. Allen certainly has to work on that. Every rookie does. I see him throw some inaccurate balls. The high ones to the sideline and several deepened into double coverage are, I think, throwaways, not inaccurate. The balls that are bad are the short balls that are consistently at the feet of receivers or at least too low. He absolutely needs to do those better. But that defect doesn't strike as so big that I'm worried about it. Do you see it differently?