Royale with Cheese

In a case against the Government and Im one of the biggest celebrities on the planet….no an Attorney has never told me that. What was the total amount of money Trump won in Lawsuits against the media? His Attorneys definitely thought it was worth it.

The Black Wall Street Times lol. I haven’t done Black Face. How many times has Kimmel?

How many times has Donald Trump done Black Face? Kimmel is up 2-0.

LOL You are claiming this is a clear cut violation of the First Amendment. They should win this incredibly easily. “Hey, we have a good case. But fire Kimmel anyway.” Man you guys are thick.

Sentences end with punctuation. If you’re going to support a racist like Kimmel, why not Trump? Why can’t he get your love?

Man, you are fighting so hard for a racist? Why is that?

Do you honestly think that ABC didn’t consult their own Attorneys? In a case like this, they are leaning on them. If it was a clear violation of Freedom Of Speech, they would fight it. Good luck having success in life not understanding something this simple.

It doesn’t bother me because that’s not what happened.

Is anyone else seeing this?

This is absolutely crazy. The rule is in the post. Its right there. FFS. It amazes me you think you know more about the FCC than the Chairman. Especially fighting so hard for a racist. What if Megyn Kelly did Black face? Would you want her off the air? Still waiting for you to answer my question.

I think we established the definition of prohibit. If you violate something that the FCC prohibits, you are breaking the rule. This cannot be explained any easier or more simple. For you to say that its not a rule when the FCC website says it is, you are being ignorant in purpose.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/prohibit

I thought the main topic was silencing free speech? Trump was silenced. Yep.

Because they felt he was in violation of FCC policies.

@4th&long

Why do you support a racist like Jimmy Kimmel? Also. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47986#:~:text=A free speech question might, government can restrict the speech .&text=Under this test%2C the court, might trigger more stringent scrutiny The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that speech made by public employees within the scope of their official duties is not protected by the First Amendment, though speech made as a private citizen on matters of public concern can be protected by a balancing test. For private sector employees, the First Amendment generally does not apply, and speech protections depend on specific federal and state laws, as well as union contracts. @4th&long I can't believe you support racists.

He intentionally mislead and that violates the integrity issue. You are wrong. You don't even know how to look up the word prohibit and we live in the age of google. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47986#:~:text=A free speech question might,government can restrict the speech.&text=Under this test%2C the court,might trigger more stringent scrutiny. The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that speech made by public employees within the scope of their official duties is not protected by the First Amendment, though speech made as a private citizen on matters of public concern can be protected by a balancing test. For private sector employees, the First Amendment generally does not apply, and speech protections depend on specific federal and state laws, as well as union contracts.

I gave it to you multiple times. But the root cause of the problem here is you don't understand or know the definition of prohibit. You're fighting this weird battle. Yes or no. You didn't answer this question last time. If you see a sign at a lake, and it says "Swimming Prohibited". Does that mean you can or can't swim in that lake? I will give you a hint, the keyword is "prohibited."

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47986#:~:text=A free speech question might,government can restrict the speech.&text=Under this test%2C the court,might trigger more stringent scrutiny. The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that speech made by public employees within the scope of their official duties is not protected by the First Amendment, though speech made as a private citizen on matters of public concern can be protected by a balancing test. For private sector employees, the First Amendment generally does not apply, and speech protections depend on specific federal and state laws, as well as union contracts.

He was very out. I think his entire other foot hit out of bounds after regaining control after the bobble.

I am getting a Jackson Hawes jersey!

And that 49-21 loss, we were up 21-0 I believe by the end of the 1st quarter.

I changed my mind. Cook is worth it.