I have heard a lot of opinions that it would "definitely have been ruled a TD". I disagree. You need the clear visual evidence, I am not saying it does not exist but I have not seen it. First is his foot all in bounds? Could someone question if blade of the the out of bounds grass/turf have touch his foot? This is really close IMO, yeah the majority of his foot is in bounds, but he side of his shoe could have been touching. But lets say you conclude his foot is in bounds, not you need clear evidence the football went over the pylon, was that shown? I did not see it if it was. Again, maybe it was but there needs to be indisputable evidence it was over the pylon. Second half timeouts are gold and the NFL errs towards keeping the play as called on the field, I think a good non challenge.
How can you clearly see the ball is over the pylon with this angle?