Patrick Duffy

To each their own....but very many people feel otherwise

Yeah, I can't really argue with ya about that. Reason I guessed 5-8. Probably about 8th though I'd say, but I do think he's top 10

Some would say that would be one of the smartest

Yeah, doesn't seem far off. I'd say anywhere between 5-8 for me. Speaking for myself, I'd consider that a "top tier". Others may feel differently I guess.

May as well start the count down

Lost my voice many of time screaming at t.v "throw the ***** ball" Always understood it to be top 5 or 10.

Yup, and I believe this likely could be his last chance. It's now or never basically for him this season imo. So I hope he can get it done.

Pretty much saw this coming myself. Retirement talk was to force Rams hand with him in a position that he clearly had the upper hand. Knew Rams were going to dish a whole lot of money to offer, however I didn't think it would be quite as much as that.

I'm pretty confident that won't be the case.

Wow! Can't help but to question some of those rankings lol. Just another one of those things to add to the list from PFF that I can't take serious.

Without going through the entire thread and I'm sure this player has been mentioned by somebody already, but I'd say T. McGee would be one of those players along with the few obvious names being mentioned. Good KR/PT that was considered fairly dangerous and also was a pretty solid CB. So when considering that he could make an impact in more than one position like he did, he would be one of the top players on the list for me

Would ya....

Affordable hookers near my area

Only 38. Sad to hear

That would be incredible! I think they had like 54-55 last season and went some games without punting at all. So 25 seems a bit low to me, but would be great. I'd guess less than last season but not by a lot, so I will say 45 punts for the season

I agree, hat is a hat and you're right, Troopers do wear hats also. But, for some reason it has more meaning for the Rangers. Regarding your question in bold....from what I understand the Rangers are involved in investigation and some of their statements about the investigation is being disputed and labeled lies or disinformation.

Some hide it better than others....they say ya gotta watch out for the quiet ones

More importantly is how you manage that anger and handling it in both a mature and safe manner that's safe for you and those around you. Don't let the rage win!!! 😀

Not necessarily the hats in general. It's the fact that there's a lot of pride involved(so I've been told) for Texan's wearing those hats in law enforcement, rangers, whatnot representing courage etc and all that type of stuff. So it's more those with the hats on and not just the hats, when seeing the ones wearing them are basically front of the camera almost every news report standing there trying to be viewed as men of courage, pride etc when in fact it was they many of them showed the exact opposite and are being labeled as cowards, liars etc..

Really bro, be so hot and humid here that it's like you could ring out the air like a wet cloth. And feels like it's hard to breathe lot of the time. I despise NC summers. Believe I saw it was going to be rather hot in WNY today and next couple days? ?

I feel ya. I'm opposite, I hate these hot, humid NC summers and love the snow (which is very rare here) and colder weather. I'm comfortable in shorts and tee when it's 50 degrees. Anyways.....

The 1st link I posted at the top is about all the other disinformation/false statements. Other 2 is more about the door being propped open in general. Not for nothing, but they look even more silly with those Texas hats that they think makes them look all serious after how cowardly some of them were proven to be lol

https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-police-union-says-misinformation-144412466.html https://www.inquirer.com/news/nation-world/uvalde-texas-school-shooting-robb-elementary-door-20220601.html https://news.yahoo.com/uvalde-teacher-did-not-leave-210343526.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

It was Uvalde official and just another on the list of statements from them that was disputed. I'll see if I can find the article again real quick