JaCrispy

Not so sure...if it were the expected cap, probably...But I don’t know that it’s a given for Tremaine...if we do, it will be difficult to sign FA’s next year...so, we shall see...

I know...my point was that fewer tests will equal fewer positive results...

Can’t fail it if they aren’t being tested...aka players could still get covid, the league just won’t care as much...👍

Ford, Wallace, or Knox...take your pick...

Only if you can get value in return...the return has to be enticing enough (ie I would be cool with two 2nd round picks, or a bottom 1st rounder if we can get it). Only foundational pieces, like Josh and Tre, are off limits...everyone else should be fair game...TE has not earned the title of foundational player to me....and if memory serves, we spent a 1st and 3rd rounder on him- so it would be wise to try and recoup some of that, if possible (if we are not planning on resigning him), so that it’s not a total waste...just my opinion.

Excellent points! 👍

I wasn’t bashing Edmunds in that particular post...I simply suggested that if they knew Edmunds was going to be out of the their price range, they should seriously consider getting value for him while they still can- which is a perfectly reasonable suggestion... And it’s no secret that Belichick has been trading away top talent for years when he wasn’t willing to pay...just the nature of the business... I understand that sometimes conditions aren’t ideal for players (ie Sam Darnold). Sometimes that’s the way the cookie crumbles...time rolls on...However, the argument about Edmunds being 22 seems like a lazy one to me...the other side of the argument is: What 22 year old player do you know that has 3 years NFL experience?

And Brady always seems to start the season off slow...

Well, that’s a racist thing to say...how dare you infringe on my right to commit crimes...soldiers died for my right to decide, whether or not, I choose to comply with the law...and anyone who disagrees with my criminal activity is straight up raaaaaasaaacist! 😉

Collins starting to let himself go?

I am 100% against sacrificing capital to trade up...9 times out of 10 the player never lives up to the cost...and the FO has not proven they can be trusted, when picking defensive talent, on a consistent enough basis to take that chance...this team will need its picks for the future...

Then they would be wise to trade him during the draft so they could get something for him...that’s what Belichick would do, if he knew he wasn’t going to resign a guy...let’s see if Beane has the same fortitude...

So tired of talking about this guy...he’s so uninspiring 😂😂😎

I could actually believe this...I remember he always seemed more moderate on CNN’s Crossfire back in the day...

As long as it’s BPA I’m good 👍

What a great parody...I could almost envision a hilarious Jeopardy sketch on SNL...😂😂

Didn’t they already do this? They got two 1st rounders from San Fran by trading back to 12...then they gave one back to Philly by trading up to 6...now they want to trade back again? They are either severely overthinking things or they are geniuses...Lol

Lol...I like this take...I agree that modern journalism has become giving opinion on news stories of the day, instead of just reporting the news... Don Lemon use to be more respectable to me...however, his awkward emotional outbursts, at times, comes off as disingenuous, imo...not to mention, I’ve literally, heard him saying things 10 years ago that contradict his woke views now...just seems phony...

He does have a lot of good takes, saying things that most people are too afraid to say...it’s refreshing...

On the surface it seems like a distraction so he doesn’t have to give his feelings on Water’s comments- which, some could argue, is indirectly conceding that her quote can’t be defended... Ultimately, it’s quite unfortunate because, regardless of political leanings, it seems like such an easy thing to denounce- unless you are for the rioting, of course...

Not sure...haven’t really been following closely...but I think he’d likely be convicted for something based on the visibility of the case...

Well, forgive me...The thread is about racism, and my response was about “systemic” racism, so I just assumed it was was self evident in my post what I was referring to...apparently not...

Well, the conversation was about racism...and there are gays and transgenders of every race...

Everyone get ready for middle class white, suburban socialists and anarchists to ride into urban cities and burn down black communities, while spray painting BLM on everything they see...

Great post...I agree... I just remember growing up, there weren’t all these adjectives in front of the word “racism” to qualify it as such...you either thought certain races were superior/inferior or you just judged people on an individual level... I think those who like to use the word “systemic” do so because it justifies them wanting to change the system...However, when you pin those people down on specific instances of “systemic” racism, they are either describing something from the 1950s (that no longer exists) or they are describing discrimination on an individual level imo (ie a person gets pulled over for having flashy rims or blasting rap music)... But nowhere do I see law or policy within the “system” that discriminates against certain groups of people, except for Affirmative Action policies, which, legally, discriminate against white and Asian people, and privileges black and brown people...