Buffalo_Gal

This is extremely well done. I have no idea who made it. Maybe this person? (edit: confirmed in comments that was who made it)

Looks like that Black Lives Matter sign in his window did not save him from the vandals.

A blowout is what it sounds like... a wash + a blow dry. There are salons that will talk it up and do a double wash or whatever. Some people will have a standing appointment for every other, or every three days and never wash or style their hair at home. Oh, and there are some salons that only do blowouts. Nothing else. Some of 'em are pretty intense. I've seen women with really long hair that will have 15 round brushes stuck in their head on different levels while the hair stylist works on a section. Sometimes it will be two people working on the hair. It is basically the updated version of when your grandma used to head to the beauty parlor on Saturday to get her hair washed and set for the week.

Nope. OAN guy.

I wonder if he will be able to get back up on his own?

Hey, if she were getting a dye job I might defend her too. Roots-are-roots. But for a blow-out!? Shesh She is wealthy enough, and has enough connections to get someone over to her house.

So, on leftie-twitter they are claiming that "remove, relocate, or contextualize" does not mean removing any of the 8 listed. So, why use the word remove? And relocating would be er, removing it. Contextualize? They are gonna rewrite history, again? Page 22

Shipwreckcrew has a new article up: Andrew Weissmann Wants Kevin Clinesmith to “Stop Snitchin” “Mr. Weissmann, when did you stop violating the civil rights of members of the Trump campaign?” That might be the first question Attorney General Barr could ask Andrew Weissmann if given the chance to inquire about his role as “Mueller’s Pit Bull” in the Special Counsel’s Office. </snip> But I first want to address some wild and uninformed speculation about the status of Clinesmith vis-à-vis the ongoing investigations initiated by Attorney General Barr into various aspects of the origins of CH and all that came after. I don’t have any first-hand information, but I have 22+ years’ experience doing exactly what it is the Durham investigation has likely just done. A federal prosecutor does not file an “Information” without first having in place three things: 1) an agreement by the defendant to waive indictment; 2) an agreement as to the specific crime the defendant will plead guilty to, and 3) an agreement as to the factual basis the defendant will admit to in order to support the guilty plea. </snip> The prosecutor NEVER enters into that agreement unless he/she is certain as to the full scope of potential criminality in which the defendant was involved. That means the defendant has sat down with the case agent/prosecutor and answered every question put to him. Those questions are not limited to just the incident to which the defendant will later plead guilty. The questions go back to the beginning, and the defendant who is hoping for the best possible outcome will, in almost all instances, answer every question, especially when he has no meaningful defense to the most obvious charge and the prosecutor has the keys to the jail cell in his hand. </snip> Next for Durham – or maybe another investigation as I have surmised – is what Clinesmith learned when he remained assigned to the investigation after the Mueller appointment. A critical issue there involves Mueller’s hiring of 17 SCO prosecutors, and their first order of business after the SCO took over the CH investigation. </snip>

I do not understand why not. They cook the polls anyway, so why not tilt it 40D/35I/25R and get the desired results. ?‍♂️ Although.... if that kind of weighted poll will not get them the desired outcome, the Ds is screwed.

From earlier:

Do as I say, not as I do. We see it over and over again.

As expected. Now, the next chess move should be interesting. I'd assume Barr/Durham expected this to happen. What is their next move? Can they proceed without Flynn being released as a political prisoner? I expect more declassification (since Ratcliffe said Sunday it was coming), but want more pleas or, barring that, indictments against #teamcoup.

We shall see. I do wonder why a FOIA was necessary if this was all on the up-and-up.

Private messages?