Buffalo_Gal

One thing I gotta say about Trump, he educates a lot of people. In an effort to "GetTrump the left/"msm" go batshit crazy over every single thing he says. And, abiding by the 24/48 hour rule, what he says usually is pretty spot on. Not always 100%, but he's certainly not "stupid" or "moronic." People dig in to prove him wrong/right, and a lot of good information is uncovered. Heck, I was wondering about that light comment he made yesterday, and found out quite a bit about UV treatments today!

"Out of respect for him"!?!??!?!? You "respect" someone who violates you against your will? Now, this is her mother saying it (1993), so maybe her mother sugarcoated it, but come on... </snip> KING: San Luis Obispo, California, hello. CALLER: Yes, hello. I’m wondering what a staffer would do besides go to the press in Washington? My daughter has just left there, after working for a prominent senator, and could not get through with her problems at all, and the only thing she could have done was go to the press, and she chose not to do it out of respect for him. KING: In other words, she had a story to tell but, out of respect for the person she worked for, she didn’t tell it? CALLER: That’s true. </snip>

Come on, how could it not be illegal before this?

Wow, and I thought we couldn't surpass the peak-stupid in the coronavirus thread today. Gary proved me wrong!

Oh, I didn't even notice that. I went to the NIH website to read the report. Link to the NIH website article.

Seriously, what is wrong with you? People are dying. That treatment has helped a lot of people NOT die. A clinical trial for this specific treatment of this specific virus could take years. (Because, it HAS gone through clinical trials for other treatments.) How about you go tell those people that are still with us they shouldn't have taken that treatment because it did not go through clinical trial treatment for THIS disease?

Sorry! I was simply pointing out that it has been used in the past. Whether it was used successfully or commonly in the '40s or '50s, I do not know. But it isn't some new idea that has been heard of before.

Ultraviolet light irradiation has been around since the '40s? I did not know that. the paper is on the Nih website, and it gets into the weeds for a layperson (that would be me), but it is interesting nevertheless.

You really are a piece of work. Thousands have benefited from the treatment (when used with zinc under a doctor's order), but for some reason, that is not good enough for you because everyone has not (sadly) survived when using it?

WTF? This is insanity!

Which you and a few others here have done in spades this morning.

It was started by a blue check-mark on twitter to control the narrative. The talking points are out. And people here have bought into it hook, line, and sinker.

OMG that Anderson Cooper reaction is GOLD!!

Disingenuous much?

YES!!!! I do. NOTHING is insane or stupid right about now. I want a treatment, I want a vaccine, I want a cure. I do not want to be held hostage in my own home... I want out. And, if looking into something you consider to be "completely ridiculous" is the key to a breakthrough? So be it. Remember, at one time people scoffed at bacteria and viruses being the cause of illnesses. It is a wonder medicine has advanced at all with attitudes like "it will not work" and "completely ridiculous" and not thinking outside the box.

Yup. But, I am insane (and stupid) for pointing that out. Oh, maybe post the UV light under the skin video again? That was a good one that seems to have been ignored.

You want Michelle Obama. You'll settle for Kamala Harris. You'll get Stacey Abrams.

Why is the government still putting Flynn through this? Accept the loss, get sued, and pay-up. The more that comes out, the worse the government looks in this... or is that now the goal?

Oh that is a good one! He did start to say that they put it under the skin, but someone interrupted him. I wasn't sure what the treatment was for as I had never heard of it being used.

Not at all!! ? I am merely pointing out that, for whatever reason {wink*wink} there is a certain segment of people on this board that do not want the truth of what was said yesterday. They do not care. They simply want a narrative, and they want to run with it. I hope you, and everyone else, continue to point to the clips, the text, and the real exchange. Maybe after 5,209,212 replays, it will finally sink in to them. But, I doubt it. TDS really is the most horrible disease.

I already pointed that out. Others pointed out other poison-cures. I also tried posting the exact text. The TDS addled are simply not having it. They want a narrative, not the truth. If President Trump asks scientists to look into a treatment, it is immediately crazy, simply because President Trump said it (even with the "it may work, it may not" caveat). Got the Jon Karl was the one that mentioned bleach, too. They really do not want the truth.

Some people have speculated that if this had stayed in Seattle, we would not have had the great shut down. Because this virus disproportionately impacted metro-NYC, and the media giants are based in NYC....

I am hoping you are not Natasha. (Although I always loved that name. My father wanted to name me Natasha. Sadly, my mother won that argument.)

I am a Trumptard? ROTFLMAO Yup, sure. You clearly have not been reading my stance on this whole shutdown. I, unlike many others here, am not so closed minded as to dismiss an idea merely because President Trump suggested scientists should look into it. ?

Sounds like some of the people who screeched the loudest in this thread are the ones that actually did need that warning. Are you included in that group? It appears likely. ? The truth does not appear to matter to a select group in this thread.