Buffalo_Gal

I'm saying, IF he truly is an attorney, I am hoping for real estate or patent. Something to keep him away from clients and courts.

That body ... yum! That face .... fantastic! That hair ... blech. Fabio was super fine back in the day. My goodness he was attractive. I mean really, really, really attractive. Mmmmmmm I should probably leave now...

This thread has come down to people who followed the Russian hoax unfold for years, including reading the report, watching the testimony, reading the redactions of newly released declassified documents, following the minutia of any and all court actions and released documents vs a couple of trolls who came in last week and are now "experts" in XYZ to gaslight.

I think he's trolling at this point. No one can be that willfully dumb. A set-up is not justice. No matter what some keyboard asshat wants to claim.

That is a perversion of justice. A set-up, withholding evidence, and coercion are not exactly what the Constitution purports. But ok, you do you. The rest of us would like a DOJ and FBI that does not set people up. There is no glory in a corrupt FBI and DOJ. No glory at all. Again, Flynn will NEVER be guilty.

I almost feel sorry (not really) for Muller after that display before Congress last year. In my mind, he walked into work every other Friday and said, "What's up" while that piece of ***** ***** Andrew Weissmann ran the show. My only real shock has always been that they did not manufacturer anything against Trump. Part 2 was to smear him with feelz, but that was about it.

Sweetie, Flynn will NEVER be guilty. Flynn was set-up, his former representation are looking at a massive malpractice suit IF Sullivan signs on the dotted line (or an appeals court smacks Sullivan around for not signing on the dotted line), and he's gonna walk away a free man after 3+ years of torture from corrupt FBI and DOJ peeps. Now, you may be fine and dandy with setting someone up, corrupting evidence, withholding evidence, and generally railroading a defendant, but most people find that to be no bueno.

You might want to stick around and check out the New York (again) thread. ? Brand new. ?

Wow, I never would have guessed that. Natives are getting restless, huh?

1) Exculpatory information was withheld from the Flynn team which didn't matter all that much when Covington was representing him because... 2) Covington was working on behalf of the FBI, not Flynn 3) Once Flynn changed representation, material was withheld from Powell (Flynn's new attorney)

Welp, I'm trying to decide if I should read these 4 pages to figure out why this got sent down to PPP, but I'll take a wild guess and figure #OrangeManBad?

Could be worse I guess:

I understand what he is saying (and it is right), but it is tough when one side plays by the rules, and the other side is always breaking the rules. And the rule-breakers never seem to pay, and are instead, rewarded.

New Jersey:

No one ever expected Obama or Biden to be charged. Hoped? Yes. Expected? No. I have wondered for a long time the kind of hoops that need to be gone through to exclude them from being indicted, while knowing that this went up to Obama.

A CNN reporter virtual signaling? Nawww

Makes me wonder what is dropping this week...

If vulnerable people are going to die from this virus no matter what, why is NYS still closed? Who is the closure protecting? There are now open hospital beds, there are treatments, there are unused ventilators. If he expects the vulnerable to die from COVID-19 no matter what, why incur the deaths that will come from being shut down? I hope he is wrong about the "no matter what" part, if those were his exact words.

Pretty much...

He's not wrong...

You cannot possibly have your head that far up your ass to be asking this as anything more than trolling. But, on the very slim chance you are not trolling or being disingenuous... How about the difference in reporting? The double standard? The absolute stupidity of combing through Kavanaugh's high school yearbook as "admissible" but Biden's Senate records are "off limits." The last is especially ridiculous as this allegation supposedly occurred while Joe Biden was a sitting Senator!! The history of one (never a peep of any type of improper conduct) versus the other that has a nickname of Creepy Joe to go with his long history of unwanted touching. How about #MeToo being a movement to prevent a Republican from assuming a Supreme Court seat, but "she's a slut" and "she's crazy" as the movement to dismiss allegations against a Democrat so he can run for President?

Don't mess with this song or movie ?