I do not believe a higher percentage of rookies starting is a valid basis for comparing the relative strengths of two teams. Often quite the opposite actually.
No. Every third post is saying the difference between Allen and Mayfield is such that the Browns supposed superior roster doesn’t make up the deficit. What’s ridiculous is saying the Browns are a better team and acting confused about pushback.
A lot of it depends on scheme and the relative quality of the supporting safety/LB coverage. It’s pretty rare when a DB can transcend average help around him like Revis or prime PP.