Nice snark.
You lose a player you are weakened as a team. The pick is compensation for that loss. What advantage would a team that lost a productive player get by trading a pick for another pick or a player or some combination of players/picks?
The draft is (in concept) set up to help poor teams get better. What about compensatory picks or trading those picks would upset the competitive balance?
[This is an automated response]The topic title is potentially misleading. Accurate titles help the community find topics relevant to their interests and avoids reader frustration. Please change the topic title to more accurately reflect content of the original post. The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.
Thank you.
TRBJ is patently UNaware.
[This is an automated response]The topic title is potentially misleading. Accurate titles help the community find topics relevant to their interests and avoids reader frustration. Please change the topic title to more accurately reflect content of the original post.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.
Thank you.
Why would anyone want a free TRBJ? That's grossly overpriced.
Consider this a shot across the bow
The next time either one of you interacts with the other directly (quoting a post) or indirectly (obviously taunting, ridiculing the other etc.[iMO]) & I see it you will be given a very long vacation.
11/17/2015 @ 7:24pm.
thank you
I can't remember if it was this thread or another but someone mentioned brady's late duck and assumed he can't throw a deep ball. That's not the case. IMO what happened there was...no immediate pressure on him, but he felt it anyway and didn't step into the throw even though I think he could have. That's what can happen if you're around him all game.