DaBillsFanSince1973

you leaving the stadium early, would be a good thing.

what's a cript? nice hat OP, dad should dig it

I'm concerned the OP is concerned about being concerned which is very concerning...because well, it's a major concern.

I laughed out loud.

one game at a time.

that I can not answer. it was just a guess on my part.

lost/deleted topics/threads?

this

that it is...was trying to get a gauge on our future opponent, the mighty fins

these last couple pages have been really entertaining. much better then the raiders/fins game.

they might, and they might not?

that I did but it's character sensitive. not for all eyes to see. !@#$ that fat feet loving team destroying mother !@#$er!!!

he's an !@#$.

you're entitled to be down on the team. those who have allowed the 17 year drought to pound them in to the dirt are never really going to have any real positive take on the future anyway. but at this point for myself, it's best to just take it one game at a time instead of projecting failure or success. it would seem that seeing failure ahead would not even give much incentive to even watch the games and with only 8 games to go and with the off seasons dragging out as they do, the best approach is ONE game at a time. 5-3

this is a good article and points out some "bumps in the road" from the past where they bounced back and that very well could be case but I can't help but to agree with the pregame guys when saying this is/was their opportunity to show the nation they're for real, and then laid an egg. for a team and coach I was admiring so far this season for their preparation, they seemed very unprepared. that game was hard to watch. I'm sure it was for every bills fan. I can not tell a lie, my very thought was, the same old bills. how can one who has been around long enough not think that? some want to use the short week for the meltdown, even the players. yet the jets were on that very same short week, so no excuses. 1-3 on the road and two of the losses against conference teams does not help your case in trying to get to the post season. 4-0 at home and going up against brees and company is not going to be any cakewalk but with the rest and 9 days to prepare they may have a chance to go 5-0 at home. the non conference wins are nice but they need the conference wins while trying to get closer to the opportunity of reaching the postseason. presently they're 3-2 in the conference and if they take down the saints and go 6-3 it may be the momentum they need when they travel out west to go up against the chargers? I wont say the jets loss completely took the wind out of any hopes going forward (reading the gameday thread reactions and threads/posts following the loss you would think the season was over) as they end up splitting with them, so not bad. but how they respond will be key? I look forward to seeing that with hopes they can handle their business and carry the momentum with them to the west coast? 5-3

does it take 3 years to retire? I say put a hurting on brady and sweep the pats* and maybe it'll speed up his thought process.

hell of a crew right there.

I wouldn't give you the satisfaction.

you looking to impress? expecting a bow here? do people look up to you? get over yourself man

you have me mixed up with somebody else. I actually left that board before it closed. you're preaching to the wrong person. I suggest stepping away from your pulpit and gathering your thoughts.

I'm taking it one game at a time.

you're a realist alright. I'm sure it was just made up click bait. ftr, no, I don't own his jersey whether that really makes a difference or not. I take your realism with a grain of salt, after all you created that idiotic orton should be on the wall thread. that's all I really need to know about how much of a realist you are.

you're a smart ass.

the reality was about what, 23 years ago? unless you can go back in to time, you can not change the reality that he was acquitted. now, 23 years later, after spending some time in prison, he is a free man that was handing out candy last night. I personally can not say he did or did not. I was not there to witness anything. I did however follow the trial and could only speculate his guilt or innocence since they were unable to convict. so, does anyone really know the reality or is it just mere speculation?