DaBillsFanSince1973

either tied for first with ne or sitting at 6-2 and 2nd in the division after the jests game. can you dig that?

I don't have you on ignore? I can dig that.

...and the poster feud continues.

so you're saying the past will become the present and the future based on the previous teams/regimes lack of success after 7 games and fans take wins for granted? I never take a win for granted and I certainly don't look at this team/regime the same as those past regimes you tend to compare them to. enjoy the game, GO BILLS!!!

I don't know why but the dean up there made me think of a tune he can add to his crap list.

exactly. all the while big stuff is grinning ear to ear saying to himself, suckers.

brown looks high as well. it's the squint in his eye that gave it away.

oh, so you're saying they'll only win two, maybe three more games? we'll see who's delusional although if a fan is looking for wins rather than losses, call me delusional then thanks nostrodomus, I'll be glad to see one of those wins come today...GO BILLS!!!

what was that, two weeks ago? how did he do last week? any clips? may as well be consistent. be sure to get some from tomorrow too, dig? on to the raaaaiders...GO BILLS!!!

forgot last season. this is not the same team, not even close. it was not a problem trading 99, it was actually a good move. it's done. I'm sure they have moved on and are focused on the job at hand, game day. it's not the pick man. it's the contract they're sending along with him, it unloads a lot financially to be able to use on the additions of the future. it's a rebuild and part of the process and it would seem pretty obvious they will be adding a nt as well as a few more positions after the season through both the draft and fa? they have plenty to work with in their first year as far as picks, more than I recall any other previous regime starting out with? if you have no patience and pretty much judge off the cuff then you will have a hard time dealing with the process. a rookie gm and hc have to start somewhere and until they fall flat and fail like some have them already doing, I will give them some time to prove themselves. so far, I like what I see. 4-2 and the raiders at home where they're presently undefeated. be great to see them go to 4-0 , been a while since they've dominated at home? I laughed out loud.

just my observation but if it wasn't worth your time, why this post? which I may add is quite petty.

trust the process/

you look at the dark side, I try to look at the bright side. some like to wallow in negativity, I try to avoid it. you want to call it realism. I'm going to call it reality wont become reality until the end result. this staff has their chance to succeed and if you and any other want to see failure before the it's said and done, go wallow in it then.

you and the OP go hand in hand. instead of looking at the bright side and thinking they may hit on some of the picks why not just go ahead and say a stupid comment like "it won't matter if we don't hit on them and/or trade most of them away to move up for a QB or player like we did with Watkins and that guy don't pan out." that's always the spirit. spirit, did I say spirit? does that coincide with savior? savior, spirit. perfect synonyms to go along with the negative poster known as savior the scout peterman. smfh

he has not been a big factor this season and why I feel they wont miss him. now, you want to go back to 2014 (10 sacks/35 tackles) form or even 2013 (7.5 sacks/46 tackles), sure then they would miss him. but 4 tackles and one sack in 2017. no, he wont be missed. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DareMa00.htm I know, it's hard to let go but in the long run this will likely be a very good decision since he wasn't a major contributor and did not fit in to their plans going forward . again, I trust the process.

you can see in to the future? how do you know they would of been better with him than without him? just speculation on your part so I will throw my speculation out there and say they wont be any worse. I trust the process.

what I like about a majority of your prediction posts so far this season, is you're wrong...

6-2. some wont like it, because well, it doesn't fit the tank agenda.

looks like something a redneck would do.

exactly my point to the savior.

another fail post by the great scout saviorpeterman. who are these "as most expect" this is just two sites who must not fit your most expect group. https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/features/writers/expert/picks http://www.espn.com/nfl/picks I'll throw in yardbarker for the hell of it. The Raiders may have saved their season with a thrilling win over Kansas City, one that cannot even be termed "last-second," because the winning play happened on an untimed down. With Denver suddenly looking vulnerable and most of the rest of the AFC unspectacular if not outright flawed, 3-4 is not a death sentence for playoff hopes. That said, if Buffalo can continue its run of successfully playing takeaway on defense, the Bills can kill two birds with one stone –strengthen their playoff hopes, while denting Oakland's wild-card chances. Tyrod Taylor has been steady, and while Buffalo's turnover margin may not be sustainable, it's getting harder to bet against a team whose confidence seems to be building steadily week after week. Pick: Bills http://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/nfl_week_8_predictions/s1__24863093

so you're saying they're going to turn it around. maybe?

that's my perspective, could go either way.