lookylookyherecomescookie

If you think McDermott is a substandard coach, there's really no point in having this conversation. I should have known better.

I've been going to Bills games since Richie Lucas, you're welcome.

Please check out the Bill's history. We are living in a golden age, you just don't screw with it.

Given Pegula's coaching hire history (Sabres-Rolston,Nolan, Bylsma,Housley, Krueger, Granato, Ruff). (Bills- Marrone, Rex 'don't let him out of the building' Ryan), to even consider the thought of McDermott (86-45, 5 straight afc east titles) being replaced is ludicrous. Begs the question: with all due respect, WGR listeners vs. WGR callers? your thoughts

I assume your 5% figure (coming from PSLs) is accurate. Just to be accurate, state and county 38% is also coming from us (the taxpayers) . Terry and the NFL portion is also coming from us (from profits). As we are the ultimate consumer, all costs are ultimately borne by us. I'm not complaining, just clarifying.

yeah, someone like Von Miller!

Any chance Woody will get all excited about jets performance today and decide he wants to keep Rodgers as starter for next year? That would be a win as big as the pats dropping from#1 to #4.

Of the top 100 receivers by total yardage as of today, Keon is #3 in avg. yard/catch. If only he was fast.

I've been fortunate to see all 3 play. 1. OJ was an incredible runner who could take over a game, even if the other team keyed on him. 2. Bruce was one of the best passer rushing DE ever, who could totally disrupt an opposing team's offense. 3. Josh is clearly the best passer the Bills have ever had. In addition, the best running QB. In addition, one of the best leaders the team has ever had. Josh can will the team to victory. As good as the other two were, they were only great at one thing. Josh is great in multiple ways. Josh hands down.

Yippee for Mr. Yippy!

I may be remembering this wrong, but I seem to remember that when Beane was first hired, he stated his goal was for the Bills to be a consistent playoff contender, emphasis on consistent, year in, year out. I think he realizes that with the super bowl being a one and done tournament, combined with the randomness of injuries (January team is never the same as Sept. team), weather, officiating, and not playing with a round ball (lucky bounces), winning a super bowl is a complete crapshoot. I think he feels that being in the tournament every year gives him his best chance of winning a super bowl (just like more draft choices give you the best chance of finding a stud-the lottery ticket model). An all-in approach doesn't seem Beane-like. The Von deal was out of character, and blew up in his face.

Try muting the sound while watching. For me, improves the viewing experience greatly. Most of the talk during a game is just to fill the space between plays. It is 98% boring, repetitive, blather. The muting experience may take you a game or two to get used to and appreciate, but it's worth a try.

If I valued the PSL at over $1.00, I would buy it. If I valued the PSL at less than $1.00, I wouldn't. You can substitute any $ amount you like into that sentence. So I guess I'm on neither team. Many factors can influence how I value something, but net worth is not one of them. Net worth certainly effects what I am able to buy, just not how I value something. I'm not trying to be difficult, just trying to describe someone else's world to you.

I live in a world where my net worth does not determine my sense of value. It's actually a very nice world to live in.

After all the pros, all the cons, all the explanations, all the reasons, at the end of the day there will be some people who end up taking out 10 year loans at 10%, to be able to then buy tickets to go to a football game. I am not disparaging these people, everyone has the right to make their own economic decisions. I am saddened that such a situation has become normalized.