lookylookyherecomescookie

It seems to me, based on the comments of people that were at the practice, that the concourse areas were really good, good access to concessions, able to see the field really well, lots of televisions everywhere, obviously good weather protection, many food options, places to eat and drink. On there other hand, the actual seating area raised a number of concerns regarding obstructed views, steepness of upper deck ,smaller than expected video screens, less protection from the weather than expected. Is it just cynical me, or is it possible that during the planning phase, the area of the stadium where they sell things was prioritized over the area where they don't? just wondering

as well as whiners that pay a lot in taxes. sometimes that's what they are whining about

I'm sorry, I don't understand how this improves the view of the game these people may have. Unless of course, they have to be conditioned to accept being mislead because people in other modern NFL stadiums may have been. Perhaps all the other bells and whistles, food, giant bisons,better urinals, maybe being protected from the rain, fewer private parking lots, etc. make up for the partial view. To be upfront, I have no skin in the game. Haven't gone to games in quite awhile,( STH for many years), now watch from the comfort of my living room. I really hope everyone likes the new stadium. We'll find out

In today's corporate America, anytime an established product or service is replaced by a new version, it's quality is worse and price more expensive. If you are monied, the more expensive won't bother you. If you are impressionable, advertising and PR will take care of the quality issue. If you are neither, you will be pissed.

oh, it can be. But I hear the food at the new place is ok, price aside

I think the obstructed views due to the glass barriers are due to a misunderstanding. People thought PSL's were personal seat licences. Silly. They are personal standing licences. Problem solved!

Replace Josh (rated 10) in these rankings with a generic average QB, (rated 5), and our team ranking goes from #5 (very good) to #16 (right in the middle of the league). The point being, at least according to this ranking, we have an average, mediocre roster with a world class QB. I've always been a Beane supporter, but at least according to this ranking, other than hitting it really big on one player, he and the Bills roster are league average. Nothing more, nothing less. But at least they are fun to watch.

I don't know if this is a good move or not, I'm just a fan. What I do know is this board this morning looks a lot like the board the night we drafted the wrong Josh.

Hardly a championship roster.

my thoughts- 1. Bills will hire an offensive side head coach 2. Kubiak can't be signed until Feb. 8, really hinders staff hires. The sooner the hire the better 3. While Beane may be in charge, Terry will make the ultimate choice 4. Have to hire a coach that Josh will be good with 5. Have to hire a coach that the fanbase can be on board with 6. Has to have head coaching experience. Look to the sabres most recent hires at coach, gm, ass't gm-experience, experience, experience. And it's working 7. Terry is a fanboy type of owner 8. Has to be someone Terry knows and is comfortable with Unless Beane absolutely doesn't want him- it's Daboll

they'd probably miss

Pretty sure it costs much more to release Samuel. otherwise-yeah

thought that was Woody Hayes, maybe not

If you think McDermott is a substandard coach, there's really no point in having this conversation. I should have known better.

I've been going to Bills games since Richie Lucas, you're welcome.