BuffaloHokie13

For now, Matt Miller's board seems to give the most realistic results. I am always a big fan of fanspeak's composite board (once it's updated) as well.

When he was throwing at the combine one of the announcers actually mentioned that you can't afford to overlook a lack of adequate arm strength, a lesson he learned from evaluating Nate Peterman.

I think Braxton Berrios has a skillset that Daboll will want, and he can be had in the later rounds.

I don't mind a new team, but I'd prefer to draft for a team that I know something about when it comes to needs, acquisitions, and such.

I'm in for Baltimore. Want me to set up a tracker sheet?

That board is reallllly bad for simulations.

Ryan Mallet was selected in round 3...

I could see them going with Rudolph at 23 or 31, but none of the others imo.

So you're trying to present a stat from a 7 games last season and apply it to the past 5 years as a whole?

I'll quote your exact words for you again I suppose. I also don't think hypocrite means what you think it means. Everything I have presented to you is based squarely in reality and can be proven with recorded statistics. Care to point me to that time where we had 4 passing TDs in a season?

really? ... As for the rest of your post, your current sample size is 1 game, and has a maximum of 4 over the past 3 years (that's the total number of times we scored 7 or fewer points in the past 49 games...). My sample size is 30 games.

Over the past 3 years we are 23-7 when the opponent is held to less than 24 points. That's over 75% win rate. Then again, I'm not sure what I expected from someone who touts demonstrably false statements as 'facts'.

The Pats aren't going to draft a late day 2 or day 3 QB on day 1.

24 points is what you meant to say.

On the contrary, almost all of them resigned But really, I know Dareus got a 2nd contract. McKelvin got a 2nd Contract. Lee Evans got an extension. Clements got a 1 year tender. Maybe more? Not sure.

Right move, wrong QB.

Even in that scenario I want to make sure Edmunds or Smith isn't available at 12 before moving.

For whatever it may be worth (probably nothing) here's the positional breakdown: WR: 9 DE: 8 LB: 7 CB: 6 DT: 6 S: 5 OT: 5 RB: 4 QB: 3 G: 2 TE: 1 C: 1

A combination of poor picks, coaching/scheme turnover, and an unwillingness to pay up once the rookie contract ends.

If I told you that, barring the players we selected this past year, there are only 3 players on our roster that we used a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd round pick on since 2000 (and all of them are still on their rookie deals) would it be surprising? If you want to include Tre White, Zay Jones, and Dion Dawkins then there are 6.

QB: Josh Rosen LB: Roquon Smith RB: Derrius Guice WR: DJ Moore I know it.

As a DC who do you cover? OBJ, Gordon, or Landry out of the slot?

Going from 12 to 7 means Giants only drop 5 slots instead of 10, which may make them more amicable to making the deal. It can be done with a similar haul to what has been rumored as our offer to the Giants in the first place. Trade 12, 53, and a 2019 4th for #7 (that's a 9.6% premium on their pick, in line with past trades). Trade 7, 22, 96, and a 2019 2nd for #2 (that's a 43.9% premium on their pick, in line with past trades). Bills would pick have a pick in every round in 2018, and have a pick in every round except the 2nd in 2019.

If the Jets are choosing between Rosen and Mayfield I would guess 70% Mayfield, 30% Rosen.

You certainly can say that, but it doesn't make it correct. We shall see what ultimately happens. As it stands with McC's small sample size, he accounted for fewer yards per game, fewer TDs per game, his TD:TO was less than half of TTs, lower YPA, lower TD%, higher TO%, lower passer rating, and a lower ANY/A. Let's hope he has improved over the past couple years.