The problem is, nowhere in the rule does it say anything about the QB being hit.
What it amounts to is, the "non-pass" is ruled an incomplete pass, and not a fumble.. They are also
adding that it doesn't apparently matter that the pass was in part or whole caused by the defender
making contact, hitting or sacking the QB. They're saying almost, oops, the QB fumbled, but we won't
call it a fumble.
Just stupid IMO.