K-9

Here's a thought, too: in the absence of any answers to those questions and instead of seeking to get those answers directly from the principles involved, why do some media folks insist on just going with their conjecture as though it means anything. I know one fact: Vontae Davis acted in the most unprofessional manner that pro football team member can act. He gets no benefit of the doubt. None.

Good points, all.

That's the last thing I'd want for TT. I'm rooting for the guy. I was just wondering if the high number after two games was because he's staying in the pocket and getting sacked or if he's getting caught behind the line of scrimmage on scrambles. But man, Carr got beaten like a rented mule his rookie year.

Nope, no snark in these two posts. Interesting how you forgot to add that part of the exchange.

But not before she gets in Edelman's grill and rips him a new one for having had the temerity to drop one of Tommy's passes during the game.

Maybe you should pose the question in a poll. If you need help constructing the question, let me know. In the meantime, your persecution act looks almost as absurd as your comparison between a rookie with 1.5 games under his belt and an eight year veteran with 60.

No need for me or anyone else to make the determination when it’s entirely self evident. Maybe “legit” is too kind a word, though. But hey, if you’re comfortable with it, good for you.

Far be it from me to be anyone’s gripe nazi so have at it. But some gripes are more legit than others and comparing a rookie with a game and a half under his belt in his rookie year to a veteran of eight years and 60 games is absurd.

Brady will retire at the two minute warning of the AFC title game after getting his ass handed to him by Jax. And he’s gonna go out in a blaze of petulant two year old temper tantrum glory!

For crissakes. If Josh Allen still looks like Taylor in his 8th year in the league, you’ll have a legit reason to gripe about it.

My emphasis is on the comparison between Hue Jackson and Sean McDermott.

Hue Jackson will soon be exposed for the racist he is when he, too, sits TT in favor of a white rookie QB. Just a matter of time.

So now it’s a prerequisite for a coach to have played the position he’s coaching? Love this place.

Since you’re really good at the google to determine the first coining of words, perhaps you wouldn’t mind finding out who was the first to use the phrase “snark douche.” Thanks.

I understand that, which is why I was curious as to the nature of his sacks.. So he’s still taking off and running a lot vs. staying in the pocket then? I haven’t seen him except on highlights, etc. But if he’s still bailing out too early, I can see his OC telling Hue that he’d rather have Baker in there.

Fair enough.

I realize that, but an 80 sack pace after two weeks is a lot. Even for him. I’m just wondering if it’s because he’s not running as much because teams are making him be a QB and keeping him in the pocket.

Disagree. Calloway has been very good and their TE is one of the better ones.

Ain’t happening.

Yeah, but an 80 sack pace after two weeks? Is he staying in the pocket more? I honestly don’t know.

I’m surprised at the high number of sacks and low completion percentage. Everything else is pretty typical, actually. I wonder how long Hue keeps Baker on the bench if TT doesn’t turn it around.

Steve Freeman needs to throw us a couple favorable loyal alumnus calls on Sunday.

Has Drew Brees told them to go pound sand yet?

It doesn’t matter to me because the “actual date the term was coined” (whatever that means) goes back decades. It may seem like it was recently invented due to its modern day vast overuse by writers too unoriginal and narrow minded to discern between different levels of higher athletic talent in prospects across various sports, but I’ve seen the term used to describe several players across several sports for a long time. For instance, I was privy to a 1981 scouting report on Herschel Walker and “generational” was used to describe his potential. I’d be interested to know who, in your research, actually takes credit for first using the term. Given it’s overuse, he should file for the copyrights.