B-Large

you're like a big kid, maybe I should have Jerry come on over and give you a good rogering....

I wonder if Planned Parenthood locations are under the umbrella of Pennsylvania's Dept of Health and Human Services regulatory power. If it is, there is no way this could happen, one State survey of that environment would have had violation all over it and the State would have had the power to suspend their license to practice. My wife shuts down places all the time in Colorado- not dead babies, but facilities who have let and elederly person sit dead on a toilette for so long they have to remove the toilet seat to get the person out of the bathroom because they fluid pooled in their backside. Urgent Care centers are not regulated by the Stae in Colorado, therefore you won't see me in one of them... its !@#$ed up what people will do when nobody is watching.... That being said, I don't care for abortion and would rather we focus on reponsible prevention of unwanted pregnancy, so we could look at abortion in the rear view of this society and lament about how awful it was. Like GG said, while this was awful to read/see, I can only imagine what abortions would be like is not done in safe medical facilities (obviously, not this example)... making them illegal doesn't end abortion, just makes it terrifiying scary and underground. Just to add, while this case is terrifying, i'd be careful making this a blanket statement to all PP accross the country that do health screenings and provide other services valuable to poor women and families. I will say that they need to hold the head of PP to account, with proper control and quality measures it should never, ever come to that.

Misunderstood? I've always understood !@#$ing little kids is wrong, morally and legally.

to be fair, social workers do thankless work in public and private charitable organizations all across this land.... and touch the lives of many of our down and outs in a positive, productive way... its wouldn't be my choice of study, but i wouldn't disparage the field either

even with a suspended sentence that is still a Felony. Your point is to scare young men to keep their dicks in their pants and out of young trim. I get that, its a noble endeavor. But that is the up to the parents of both kids to tell them to keep it zipped up, or prepare them with the knowledge of how to avoid pregnancy if they decided to whip it out and whip it in. Perhaps the question is do we want more laws, more power delgeated to the Government and legal system, or do we want citziens with children to step up and own up to the reposnisbility?

I think you will always have bottomfeeders, that just a reality of life and society. However, with public assistance I think it should be a few things: 1. TANF should be target for our fellow Americans in true need, but who intend to lift themselves up to self-sufficiency in a reasonable amout of time. 2. TANF should not be fun nor comfortable. It should help families, but not fully support families... there has to be incentive to get back to work 3. We should not create a program then incents people to to have more children- children that end up being the losers when they struggle and have to fend for themselves. 4. TANF should come with reasonable expectations of getting your child to school, parents attending training classes for skills, or having work requirement if someone is unable to work for some reason. I believe the argument against this would be undue stress on a child who is a victim of ****ty parents, but I see it as turning the screws on parents to hold their child and themselves to account.

So you fill up prisons with underaged horny teenage boys? That will be less expensive and much more productive for society... how about we teach kids about sex, birth control and not make it a sensative subject everybody is afraid to talk about. I believe you should still encourage kids to wait to have sex until they are old enough to handle such behavior, in most families that is marriage, but we need to realize that people get married in their 30's right now, most kids no matter the upbringing are not going to wait that long. We are highly sexual beings be design, that how we ensure the species... that is a good thing... but we need to be able to reach kids at a young age and let them know a condom saves them and everybody a huge headache.

IF you get more support through TANF for additional children, would it be that unresonable the expectation be those Children in benefit at least graduate high school? Now of course there are exception for Retards and Cappers, but overall , is it that radical? I have a buddy that is from Tennesee... he couldn't get out of thst State fast enough, and he is in court tryig get his kids out too.

Jerry Sandusky just read this article..... HE APPROVED

I'm paying for my community children to go to public schools..... so yes, I guess they are mine. and boy do I have **** load of crapy yard work that needs done... Thank God for Community Children

tight end.....

Oh, God, not the who does more Charity debate again...

So you always think **** when you see my posts? Were gonna disgree on many of the items in your post as we see the President and his policies differently. I do not question the current POTUS' willigness to act in full force in the event of threat, and I believe the rest of the world, even retards like Iran and NK know it as well. I am not so convinced that not being able to create a bi-partisan environment in our Government gives the signal to said Retards that America in inept, unwilling or will be deterred in protecting our interests. The experts (so called experts) from Fox to CNN to everybody has the same opinion of NK, rhetorical sabre rattling (of bed pans.... yes, bed pans). Will flying over as you suggested scare them? Sure, its plausible. Will in antagoize someone into irrational action because the new leader is wet behind the ears and inexpereinced? We don't know, it a relatively unknown commodity... Naive wishing for peace is the surest way to encourage and aggressor.. is that statement true in this case, or is NK just being, well, NK?

being calulating and strategic is all of the sudden kitty? Didn't we just spend a decade cleaning up the deserts of terrorists?

Is seems to me they are trying to determine if The Boy plays the same MO as his father, bat pans, make a hissy, only to in the end be more rhetoric and posturing that anything. They know who Dad was, not quite so sure who the kid is... does it make sense to antagonize a a threat, when all along it was going to be a threat anyway? NK has a history of this kind of ****. Now Iran on the other hand, an emerging nuclear state is much more concerning my my opinion. Were not sure how they behave, but you have to give creedence to the president saying they want to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. I don't think its weakness or kitty... heck, were dropping ordinance on targets with Drones constantly...the Presdient has a kill list... I don't think anyoe questions the American miltary might... what they may question is the Americans Publics willingness to spend another 5-10 years fighting wars on two fronts again as we march lock-step into national default.

So the US is being cautious when dealing with a regime they know little about since the Old Man died, who is nuclear, and that is weakness? What would be your course of action?

To my room, then directly the Gulag

Oh, I thought I missed something. He earned the pension through service, I have no issue with that, what crime might he has been charged with?

Whose are the hate spewing atheists here???

We're does it say anything about his pension?

Queer

I don't want to brag, but I was accepted at Canisius College and pulled down a 2.8... I am what they call "street smart"

That !@#$er drives into my hood, takes a copter to Boulder.... Bastard

Its retarded. He and Romney stayed at the Doubetree by my house for the debate, maybe a mile... it was a cluster!@#$. Last night I was sweaty from the gym, all I wanted to do was go home a shower... he signed the Stimulus Bill at City Park, 1 mile form my house.... every since COLO became a swing state, these tards are always coming town !@#$ing my **** up-

Rely on experience, essentially the same program was implemented and rolled out in Massachusetts... how did that fair, is it still in place, if ot favorable or unfavorable? I know it is a one state deal, but I am sure the Administration paid close attention to Mass from start to finish in crafting this bill, all the way to final rollout. Republicans would be best served by not baking off, rather drafting a very specific document that would offer their alternative to HMO for all which is what the ACA essentially is. and yes, more detailed that sell across state lines and tort reform... people don't likely know insurance is a State specific issue and most probably don't know what Tort Law is. The republicans need to dumb their plan down and make it atracttive to real voters, not a grand scheme of vague that people can't sink into...