Jump to content

Bleeding Bills Blue

Community Member
  • Posts

    10,913
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bleeding Bills Blue

  1. I guess... Most of the teams below us had massive amounts of turnovers. Personally though, i didn't see much difference between our offense's production and like the dolphins or bengals.
  2. Regression on O? How much worse could we get? 22nd in points and 29th in yards... 3 points in our first playoff game in like 20 years. Hopefully Daboll can come up with something better than run-run-pass-punt.
  3. I mean - we hosted one of the later mini-camps this year so that makes sense. The negotiations all take place with the agents, but the players have to actually be present to sign the contracts.
  4. I feel like if Klingons had a position it would be like MLB or SS... so good fit!
  5. My hope is that Newhouse or McDermott can replace him in the starting lineup.
  6. I agree that he's not a lock. However, who's replacing him? He was legit our best player on the field in the playoff game against Jax. I'm not sure the 1.8 mil in cap savings is worth releasing a special teams contributor, and a player who can play both SAM and DE. I could see trading lawson, as cutting him costs more than keeping him. For those drawing a ragland parallel, he did start 10 games last year FWIW. Im hopeful that we cut mills TBH.
  7. He was injured in year 1 and basically missed camp. He wasn't a world beater but neither was Yarbrough or Davis. I doubt he's cut as his cap hit will more than double if released. Traded maybe, but only if they believe that they have the depth at DE to cover his loss. As for him as a player - obviously we'd all like to see more from him. But he's on a rookie contract, he's 23 years old, and there's a ton of potential there - hopefully he's motivated to get a 5th year option or raise.
  8. I believe we brought in Gaines for that spot. He's still available if we need depth at the position. We know he's not a star - hes 28 years old. You don't find stars by just settling for the mediocre DB that you had the year before.
  9. They have McCown, Bridgewater, Darnold - they still have Hack who might have trade value - but everyone knows he gets cut. Maybe he sticks til preseason game 4 just to see if you can squeeze a pick out of someone, but i don't think anyone's offering anything for the guy.
  10. It seems like they did an investigation upon them being made aware of the rumors, and after that they spoke to him about it and it seems like he was forced to resign.
  11. Dallas could just sign julius thomas or gary barnidge and not have to give anything up. They also don't have the cap room to make this work without extending clay.
  12. I want them to work harder than the guys next to him, film study - extra reps - weight room etc. I want him to have that moxie and swagger that is just infectious... you're never out of a game with this guy. I don't want there to be any inherent weaknesses to his game. It makes you so much harder to gameplan for when you can do a little bit of everything.
  13. Colts moved from 3 to 6 and got 3 seconds... and the guy they probably wanted at 3.
  14. I mean he was basically in charge from 06 on - once they fired donahoe he got a big promotion. The team's general lack of success or direction in 10+ years has to be somewhat attributed to that.
  15. I'm personally glad he's gone because of BOTH team's general lack of success during his tenure. People get fired all the time for less, and they may have been looking for a reason to get out of his contract - hence the investigation (purely speculation)
  16. I love that you're defending him and you have no idea what he even did. He could have made unwanted advances to someone (or multiple people), or his behavior could have caused some issues at work (making a scene in the office, or just inappropriate office behavior in general), or he could have just used inappropriate language for the office. In the end they did an investigation, and when confronted - he basically told them he did nothing wrong. You just draw a parallel to a married couple who met prior to working together in like 1990 - and say that's somehow the same thing. They could have you know, been transparent and openly dating.
  17. Howso? He acted inappropriate at work, and had inappropriate work relationships (lets assume he did something wrong). When confronted about it by his boss and likely HR, this was the end result - and they mentioned deceit as a reason why.
  18. That's all well and good... but you don't really know the nature of KP & TPs relationship (IE they could have been dating before she started), or the nature of Brandon's indiscretions (he may have just had a consensual relationship with one person, or he could have done something completely different and inappropriate). So it's a tad of a stretch and generalization.
  19. Beane didn't go down for anything. That's the slander part. Brandon is the one who was let go.
  20. I mean... it seems like they met. and have been together for like 25-30 years? It's not really comparable to the president of the company sleeping with subordinates imo.
×
×
  • Create New...