Thurmal34

I thought we didn't like participation trophies anymore. Or are we handing them out again? Someone tell me what to think!

I think you are on to something here. I mean, I suspect they would spend the capital to draft theyvguybthey think is a franchise changer but short of that I think what you posit has a lot of traction. This group is looking for high quality volume on which to build a legacy. Those six pix could just as easily yield a stud DE, a cornerstone LT, a contributing DT, a promising OG, and two R3 players as one QB.

What do you mean which side? There are Nazis, and there are people that fight them. In America, that's only ONE side.

Peterman is our long term backup. Our long term starter arrives in April.

Yeah I hear this, spot on. No idea what they are thinking here. Only thing I can imagine is they know Cordy's foot is cooked. Also agree worried about Wood's stoutness.

Bummer. They could certainly use him right about now.

He was not suited for RT b/c of injury and planting outside leg on that side of line but at LT right knee injury far less of a factor. He was always more effective on spot duty at LT than at longer term duty at RT. That said, it's blurry who let him walk...was it indeed the new regime?

Groy looks like he has a future, and Miller while getting beat by FC tonight is solid but what is the future looking like? Is Seantrell part of the picture? Who takes over for Richie? We need continuity and depth there badly.

Sorry, should have made my OP more clear. What is the long term plan to improve this group? Not expecting miracles in 2017

Thin at starter, thin at backup. E Wood expires when, at the end of this year? Incognito old, Cordy's health an unknown. What is the plan for improving this group?

Don't forget Justin Armour.

But the head to neck ratio...

Mike Glennon's head to neck ratio is like 1:1

He'll be in radio in 2017.

There are so many (or one) men who assured all of us since we are such simps that McCoy would be on radio by now. I hate (or love) to point out when my fellow opinionators are wrong but chances are it's best to not say anything and have ppl assume you are an idiot than to boldly proclaim something, be wrong AGAIN, and remove all doubt.

It's either take a QB every draft or it isn't. Take a freaking position one time.

Ralph's biplane is due for repairs?

Many times a power screwdriver can resolve the issue.

If this is true then Whaley /job If not then Vic is also /no accountability Whoops! Seems you are defending Whaley, since you cite 31 other FOs that made the same choice as DW inyourexample

Hammer mentioned this a while back, that his truck was almost always gone by 5:30-6:00. Not too impressive.

Jeckyll and Hyde team.

It's amazing how close the Buffalo Bills came to beating the Seahawks in their building.

Those guys = Kenneth Davis to Shady's Thurman. Solid to elite backups/change of pace guys. The very reason they have been so effective is the juxtaposition against the stars. No team has ever given Kenny Davis, Mike Gillislee, or Fat Karl 235-250 carries. Who is smarter, the GMs that could have done that or you?

Agreed. 1/4 has never been a majority, or dare I say, a ton. Guess it all depends on agenda.

With the exact same personnel? If not, then your argument is disingenuous at best and specious at worst. Or is this the Todd Bowles thread 2.0? Can we, for once, attach some perspective to our posts? Stop this madness.