Just in Atlanta

It's a classic show -- like I Love Lucy, All in the Family, Cheers, Seinfeld...Part of pop culture -- a famous line on par with "you have some splainin to do," Meathead, Nooorm!..., No soup for you.

You underestimate this board's pun prowess.

If he stole Buffalo wings, would we be better with it?

You could almost say it's reached a boiling point.

_____________ will never make it. Consider me out too.

Publix should pay this guy -- can you imagine crab sales over the next week? That's because it's a tough case to crack. Boom!

You're right. However, it really is like trading two picks, because the Browns still get a high first rounder and a second rounder and a proven wr for only trading a few spots. Seems like a horrible idea.

Don't be so crabby. He needs to find a way to get a leg up.

This story has a pun factor 10 on the pun factor scale. His team needs him. He needs to quit acting so shellfish. ...and now he's gonna spend some time in the tank. I'll need to dig my claws into this story before forming a final opinion did he call his lawyer from his shellphone? The lawyer will probably seal the results of that convo. This just proves Winston is real bottom-feeder. //stretchin' it too far So now we know he can't have his crab cake and eat it too.

Seems like a horrible idea, even if he does become an elite receiver, trading two high draft picks AND a proven WR for a ... WR. Would the Steelers or Patriots -- the two most successful teams in the AFC -- do this?

They should be paid for their work; if the allegations in the suit are correct the Jills deserve more compensation. But some of the glamour tips, etc. are part of the job. You're being paid to sell sex. Nothing more. Of course a guide is going to include stuff that on its surface sounds silly to the rest of us.

Place holder text. Somehow published.

Wow.

It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with.

2024: Don Trumps' toupee learns at a geometric rate. In 2025, it becomes self-aware.

This kind of successful frivolous lawsuit opens the doors for suing for 13 years of pain and suffering. Wait... Anyone in with me for a class action? That won't even cover two glasses of wine unless you're ordering Gallo.

If he doesn't do this -- I'm not sure one way or another -- then he's being dishonest. Thanks for the example. But someone who doesn't change his mind on something as fluid and unpredictable as sports is thick headed. He should change his mind.

This board has thinner skin that I ever imagined, and I've been here for years, AND I thought it was really thin skinned. Can't say I love every column, but most to me have been decent and forced me to revaluate my illogical optimism. The team hasn't been to the playoffs in 13 years. You'd have to be a hack to find positivity in that. That isn't bad luck; there are reasons for this and like him or not or agree with him or not, there is something deeply wrong with a franchise that can't once make the postseason in so many years. Would love examples of his alleged dishonesty, etc. Is he at times overly negative. Yep. Journalism is 75 percent negativity. Always has. To Why So Serious?, what good does a cheerleader do to a fanbase of a failing enterprise?

And for the next random key stroke player: ahgf kfjahjkhdfkdjfkp

I'm not a lawyer or in-the-know, but I play them on this board.

Always loved the Supremes.

Well, someone has to "own" the team before it's sold. It just would seem this should have been messaged before he passed. It appears like "now what do we do?" despite the guy being 95. And Mary is cheap.

I see and respect your point. But I don't think there's anything "unfortunate" about dying at 95. I would call that pretty fortunate to live that long. He's gone, and that's all there is too it. Don't understand the need to sugarcoat words with fluff just to be sensitive about a guy we all knew was going to go anytime.

They are paying the writer money to write opinion. He has an opinion on a news event on a public figure, who just passed. No one will read the column a year, or a month, from now. (That's why they call it NEWs, not olds...corny joke.) He was public, and gets the positives and negatives that go along with it, including after death. Emotion is high with a beloved figure, and that is understandable, but I have zero problem with this piece.

He just passed. It's news...now. The time to analyze is now. Not a year from now. The guy is not in the business of being respectful. He's in the business of news and opinion, regardless of whether you agree with that opinion.