Jump to content

Dorkington

Community Member
  • Posts

    14,189
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dorkington

  1. He's not a big target that plays the middle of the field?
  2. I'm still wondering why Tyrod's, Shady's, Karlos's, and Mike's rushing yards don't count.
  3. And unfortunately for EJ, his first two years were being molded by a **** offensive coaching staff, lack of vet presence is first year, and no QB coach. Hopefully Whaley has learned from that, and our current coaching staff is a bit better at developing a player for the NFL.
  4. TT and Shady's rushing stats don't count? Karlos and Gillislee both averaged 5.6ypc. So three of our RBs had good success, our QB had good success. But they don't count because Boom Herron and Boobie Dixon struggled? Seriously?' Tyrod/Shady/Karlos/Mike (Don't count) 447 att, 2247yds, 5 ypc, 17 tds 88%att, 92%yds, 89% tds Boom/Boobie (Do count) 32 att, 81 yds. 2.5ypc, 1 td 6%att, 3%ypc, 5%td TBD continues to be filled with amazing minds.
  5. We were one of the top rushing teams, and TT had the longest time to throw in the league as far as I know... so yeah, on paper the team might be weak on the right side, but it's clearly not *that* bad, or easily made up for by scheme, because otherwise the referenced wouldn't be happening.
  6. Re EJ and TT, I think TT is what EJ could have been in many ways if we handled EJ properly. TT went to a team with an experienced staff, respectable offensive coordinator, and an entrenched probowl starter in front of him. EJ went to a team in flux, coaches with almost no experience, no QB coach, and a QB in front of him that ended his career in the preseason. These sorts of 'development' talents very much depend on the actual development by NFL coaches and players. Most QBs fall into this territory, there's very few QBs that come out of the draft that would be good no matter where they go. We screwed up EJ's development big time, and got lucky to pick up a QB developed by another team.
  7. I don't know anything about what kickers are out there, but hopefully we bring a couple in.
  8. Seems like they did decent on paper, we'll find out in a few years if it was any good though.
  9. A head scratcher, but then I remembered the Boom/Boobie stretch, and that Karlos might have a short career.
  10. I should say a TBD QB controversy.
  11. And here we go, another year of offseason QB controversy.
  12. Not good enough. Whaley must go. Rex sucks. Something something Ralph.
  13. Our personnel still says 4-3 to me... I'm feeling dumb 😐
  14. I was expecting something along the lines of a NT if/when we went DT, so this is interesting to me... Either way, three positions I wanted early are done, so now BPA for the rest?
  15. I'm liking the draft so far from positions selected
  16. This thread should be stickied, and the first post updated to reflect all offseason moves.... imo
  17. I don't know the first thing about college players, but I'm happy. I wanted our first two picks to be one pass rushing Mario replacement, and one starting caliber inside linebacker. Hopefully round 2 we get a stud linebacker... then I'm wanting depth at DT, OG, OT, WR.... best player available.
  18. The vast majority of voters vote for the major parties. If your answer is 'not participating' then don't click an answer on the poll.
  19. Alright. Well, respectfully, until I'm provided proof that points otherwise. I'm going to say that the GM is *at least* partially responsible for player and coaching personnel decisions. And since we haven't made the playoffs under his watch, I call that 'not good enough currently', even though I feel with some continuity in place (Owner, GM, Coaches) we should get there in time.
  20. Realistically the two major party candidates will get the vast majority of votes. The only situation I see something else happening is if Sanders runs as an independent, and/or Trump gets ousted at the convention, and runs as an independent, himself.
  21. He certainly has input, and we're not changing owners anytime soon.
  22. Well, it looks like the dust has settled, resulting in Clinton and Trump winning the most votes in their respective parties. Whether they end up being the actual candidates, that's to be determined. BUT let's assume they are. Who are you voting for, and why?
  23. Still not good enough. Yet. Like I said, I like him, and want him (and Ryan) to stick around for a while, to see what we can build. But I'm also not going to say he, or the Bills are successful at the moment.
×
×
  • Create New...